scholarly journals Reasons for antihypertensive medication nonadherence influence physician preferences for hypertension management

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R E Schmieder ◽  
D E Kandzari ◽  
T.-D Wang ◽  
Y.-H Lee ◽  
C Haro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction Patient nonadherence to prescribed antihypertensive medications is a major contributor to low global hypertension control rates. Attitudes toward renal denervation vary between physicians and patients, with recent data showing that side effects from medications is a key factor influencing both patient nonadherence to prescribed medications and preferences for interventional treatment. The influence of patient nonadherence on physician recommendations for renal denervation is not well understood. Purpose To examine whether specific reasons for patient nonadherence influence physician preferences for renal denervation as a treatment option for hypertension. Methods Online surveys were fielded to general and interventional cardiologists in Europe and the United States. Physicians were asked to position their willingness to recommend renal denervation in the hypertension management pathway based on three factors of nonadherence: patients' preference not to take antihypertensive medications, medication side effects, and nonspecific nonadherence to medication. The surveys followed the highest industry standards ISO 20252. Results were compared using two-tailed Z tests. Results Over two-thirds of 501 physicians surveyed stated that they would recommend renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension irrespective of the reason for nonadherence. This recommendation was significantly more common in the scenario of patient reported medication side effects as compared with desire not to take medications or other nonspecific reasons for nonadherence (p<0.001 for both; Figure) Conclusions Surveyed physicians were more likely to recommend renal denervation to patients reporting side effects with their antihypertensive medications than for other reasons of nonadherence. These findings underscore the influence of patient-specific reasons for medication nonadherence on provider recommendations as part of a shared decision-making process when evaluating different options for hypertension management. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Medtronic

BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (sep15 2) ◽  
pp. c4999-c4999

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Claire J. Wiggins ◽  
Susan Y. Chon

As aberrant Notch signaling has been linked to cancerous growth, Notch inhibitors represent a novel category of targeted oncological therapy. Notch pathways in tumor cells may contribute to proliferation or limit apoptosis and differentiation. Healthy skin differentiation and homeostasis are reliant on normal Notch expression, and disruption of this signaling has been implicated in dermatological conditions such as hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and lichen planus. Here, we describe two cases of patients with cutaneous side effects from Notch inhibitor treatment for adenoid cyst carcinoma (ACC) and review the role of Notch signaling in skin disease. By illuminating connections between medication side effects and disease pathogenesis, our goal is to increase awareness of the cutaneous side effects of Notch inhibitor treatment.


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Fawzi ◽  
Mohamed Yousry Abdel Mohsen ◽  
Abdel Hamid Hashem ◽  
Suaad Moussa ◽  
Elizabeth Coker ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground: Adherence to treatment is a complex and poorly understood phenomenon. This study investigates the relationship between older depressed patients’ adherence to antidepressants and their beliefs about and knowledge of the medication.Methods: Assessment was undertaken of 108 outpatients over the age of 55 years diagnosed with depressive disorder and treated for at least four weeks with antidepressants. Adherence was assessed using two self-report measures: the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) and a Global Adherence Measure (GAM). Potential predictors of adherence investigated included sociodemographic, medication and illness variables. In addition, 33 carers were interviewed regarding general medication beliefs.Results: 56% of patients reported 80% or higher adherence on the GAM. Sociodemographic variables were not associated with adherence on the MARS. Specific beliefs about medicines, such as “my health depends on antidepressants” (necessity) and being less worried about becoming dependant on antidepressants (concern) were highly correlated with adherence. General beliefs about medicines causing harm or being overprescribed, experiencing medication side-effects and severity of depression also correlated with poor adherence. Linear regression with the MARS as the dependent variable explained 44.3% of the variance and showed adherence to be higher in subjects with healthy specific beliefs who received more information about antidepressants and worse with depression severity and autonomic side-effects.Conclusions: Our findings strongly support a role for specific beliefs about medicines in adherence. Challenging patients’ beliefs, providing information about treatment and discussing side-effects could improve adherence. Poor response to treatment and medication side-effects can indicate poor adherence and should be considered before switching medications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document