scholarly journals Three-dimensional imaging in the context of minimally invasive and transcatheter cardiovascular interventions using multi-detector computed tomography: from pre-operative planning to intra-operative guidance

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (22) ◽  
pp. 2727-2740 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Schoenhagen ◽  
U. Numburi ◽  
S. S. Halliburton ◽  
P. Aulbach ◽  
M. von Roden ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Valeria Vendries ◽  
Tamas Ungi ◽  
Jordan Harry ◽  
Manuela Kunz ◽  
Jana Podlipská ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Osteophytes are common radiographic markers of osteoarthritis. However, they are not accurately depicted using conventional imaging, thus hampering surgical interventions that rely on pre-operative images. Studies have shown that ultrasound (US) is promising at detecting osteophytes and monitoring the progression of osteoarthritis. Furthermore, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound reconstructions may offer a means to quantify osteophytes. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of osteophyte depiction in the knee joint between 3D US and conventional computed tomography (CT). Methods Eleven human cadaveric knees were pre-screened for the presence of osteophytes. Three osteoarthritic knees were selected, and then, 3D US and CT images were obtained, segmented, and digitally reconstructed in 3D. After dissection, high-resolution structured light scanner (SLS) images of the joint surfaces were obtained. Surface matching and root mean square (RMS) error analyses of surface distances were performed to assess the accuracy of each modality in capturing osteophytes. The RMS errors were compared between 3D US, CT and SLS models. Results Average RMS error comparisons for 3D US versus SLS and CT versus SLS models were 0.87 mm ± 0.33 mm (average ± standard deviation) and 0.95 mm ± 0.32 mm, respectively. No statistical difference was found between 3D US and CT. Comparative observations of imaging modalities suggested that 3D US better depicted osteophytes with cartilage and fibrocartilage tissue characteristics compared to CT. Conclusion Using 3D US can improve the depiction of osteophytes with a cartilaginous portion compared to CT. It can also provide useful information about the presence and extent of osteophytes. Whilst algorithm improvements for automatic segmentation and registration of US are needed to provide a more robust investigation of osteophyte depiction accuracy, this investigation puts forward the potential application for 3D US in routine diagnostic evaluations and pre-operative planning of osteoarthritis.


1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fukai Toyofuku ◽  
Takemasa Tanaka ◽  
Sigenobu Kanda

Orthopedics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1269-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven T Woolson ◽  
Linda L Fellingham ◽  
Parvati Dev ◽  
Arthur Vassiliadis

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
SManoj Kumar ◽  
Hazza Al Hobeira ◽  
MohammadD Aljanakh ◽  
Sameer Shaikh ◽  
Kurian Ponnuse ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (24) ◽  
pp. 3665-3669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayoshi Akimoto ◽  
Akihiko Morita ◽  
Keiji Shiobara ◽  
Makoto Hara ◽  
Masayuki Minami ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaid Baqain ◽  
Abeer Al Hadidi

Dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the three-dimensional imaging of choice in modern dentistry. In the developed world, guidelines have been published on the use of CBCT in dentistry, largely in response to the risks associated with ionising radiation exposure. However, the availability of different models on the market at affordable prices has made this machine an integral part of the contemporary dentists’ apparatus, even in the developing world. Here, we underline the importance of awareness on radiation protection, image acquisition, familiarity with the software and image interpretation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document