scholarly journals P6474Contemporary management of coronary artery disease in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Guidelines meet clinical practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Pyka ◽  
M. Hawranek ◽  
M. Tajstra ◽  
J. Gorol ◽  
A. Kurek ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Rusinaru ◽  
David Houpe ◽  
Catherine Szymanski ◽  
Franck Lévy ◽  
Sylvestre Maréchaux ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haozhang Huang ◽  
Jin Liu ◽  
Min Lei ◽  
Zhou Yang ◽  
Kunming Bao ◽  
...  

Aims: The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics and outcomes of the universal new definition of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) and to identify predictors for HFimpEF among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods: CAD subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (EF ≤ 40%) at baseline were enrolled from the real-world registry of the Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt study from January 2007 to December 2018. The new definition of HFimpEF was defined as left ventricular EF (LVEF) of≤40% at baseline and with improvement of up to 40% and at least a ≥ 10% increase during 1 month to 1 year after discharge.Results: Of the 747 CAD patients with HFrEF (86.7% males, mean age: 61.4 ± 11 years), 267 (35.7%) patients conformed to the new HFimpEF definition. Patients with HFimpEF were younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98 [0.97–0.99]) and had a higher rate of hypertension (aOR:1.43 [1.04–1.98]), lower rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment at the time of detection of HFrEF (aOR: 0.48 [0.34–0.69]), history of PCI (aOR: 0.51 [0.28–0.88]), history of acute myocardial infarction (aOR: 0.40 [0.21–0.70]), and lower left ventricular end diastolic diameter (aOR: 0.92 [0.90–0.95]). During 3.3-year follow-up, patients with HFimpEF demonstrated lower rates of long-term all-cause mortality (13.1% vs. 20.8%, aHR: 0.61[0.41–0.90]).Conclusion: In our study, CAD patients with HFimpEF achieved a better prognosis compared to those with persistent HFrEF. Patients with CAD meeting the criteria for the universal definition of HFimpEF tended to be younger, presented fewer clinical comorbidities, and had lower left ventricular end diastolic diameter.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
YOUHOK Lim

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The most common etiologies of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Cambodia included heart failure (HF) (52.9%), angina pectoris (11.6%), and acute myocardial infarction (4.11%). Purpose The goal of this study is to describe characteristics, clinical features, evaluation and treatment of patients with HF admitted to one public hospital in Cambodia. Methods This retrospective study included all patients age ≥18 years who were admitted with the diagnosis of HF to the Intensive Care Unit of one public hospital from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018. Out of 140 cases, 20 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Characteristics, evaluation, and treatment of the 120 remaining patients were analyzed. Results HF with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) was present in 15%, with mid-range EF (HFmrEF) in 13.3%, and preserved EF (HFpEF) in 71.7% of patients. Hypertension was more prevalent in HFpEF (89.5%, P <0.001) (table 1). Diabetes was more common in HFpEF and HFmrEF (52.3% and 43.7%, P = 0.316) (table 1). Coronary artery disease was more prevalent in HFrEF (72.2%, P = 0.015) (table 1). Global wall hypokinesia was more common in HFrEF group (72.2%, P <0.001) (figure 1). Patients with HFrEF who were given ACEi/ARB (44.4%, P = 0.324) was lower than those with HFpEF (55.8%, P = 0.324). Oral beta-blockers were commonly used in HFrEF (44.4%, P <0.175). Spironolactone was prescribed more in HFmrEF (56.2%, P <0.001) patients than in those with HFrEF (44.4%, P <0.001). Conclusions HFpEF was the most common types of HF in this population, and was associated with hypertension and diabetes. HFrEF was least common and was associated with CAD. Prevention and treatment of hypertension and diabetes is essential to reduce the incidence of HFpEF while greater use of guideline recommended drugs is needed in HFrEF. TABLE 1: Characteristics of HF Patients Clinical characteristics Total (n = 120) HFrEF (n = 18) HFmrEF (n = 16) HFpEF (n = 86) p value Age (years) 58.8 ± 15.2 57.2 ± 16.3 57.3 ± 16.3 61.8 ± 12.9 0.274 Women, n (%) 57 (47.5) 10 (55.5) 4 (25.0) 43 (50.0) 0.14 Men, n (%) 63 (52.5) 8 (44.4) 12 (75.0) 43 (50.0) 0.14 Hypertension, n (%) 95 (79.2) 7 (38.9) 11 (68.7) 77 (89.5) <0.001 Diabetes, n (%) 58 (48.3) 6 (33.3) 7 (43.7) 45 (52.3) 0.316 CAD, n (%) 55 (45.8) 13 (72.2) 9 (56.2) 32 (37.2) 0.015 Values are shown as n (%) or mean ± SD. HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; CAD, coronary artery disease. Abstract FIGURE 1: Proportion of HF and LVWM


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Shaneez Najmy ◽  
Rajan Paudel ◽  
Ajay Adhikari ◽  
Reeju Manandhar ◽  
Chandra Mani Adhikari ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Even though heart failure (HF) is a major global health problem, studies on the prevalence and etiology of HF in Nepal are scant. Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been reported to be the etiology in 18% of HF presentations to the emergency department of a tertiary cardiac center in Nepal1. Present study evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of CAD in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with coronary angiography (CAG). Methods: In a prospective, observational study, conducted from June 2018 to May 2019, 95 patients with HFrEF undergoing CAG, at Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 62.7±10.1 years, with 67% males. Obstructive CAD was present in 31(33%) with 48%, 39% and 13% having triple (TVD), single (SVD) and double vessel disease (DVD) respectively. Age ≥ 65 years, smokers, dyslipidemia, obesity, angina, indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume (iEDV), indexed LV systolic diameter (iLVIDs) and regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) on echocardiography were predictors of CAD, among only which, smoking was the independent predictor of CAD. Conclusion: Our results suggest a lower prevalence of CAD in HFrEF than previously reported from developed countries, which may be due to a systematic angiography approach and exclusion of previous coronary events. We encourage clinicians to aggressively identify this co-morbidity as it has important treatment and prognostic implementations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document