P3517Failure to achieve adequate heart rate control in women during therapy optimization

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Kutyifa ◽  
J W Erath ◽  
A Burch ◽  
B Assmus ◽  
D Bondermann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Previous studies highlighted the importance of adequate heart rate control in heart failure patients, and suggested under-treatment with beta-blockers especially in women. However, data on women achieving effective heart rate control during beta-blocker therapy optimization are lacking. Methods The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) allows continuous monitoring of heart rate (HR) trends during WCD use. In the current study, we assessed resting HR trends (nighttime: midnight-7am) in women, both at the beginning of WCD use and at the end of WCD use to assess the adequacy of beta-blockade following a typical 3 months of therapy optimization with beta-blockers. An adequate heart rate control was defined as having a nighttime HR <70 bpm at the end of the 3 months. Results There were a total of 21,453 women with at least 30 days of WCD use (>140 hours WCD use on the first and last week). The mean age was 67 years (IQR 58–75). The mean nighttime heart rate was 72 bpm (IQR 65–81) at the beginning of WCD use, that decreased to 68 bpm (IQR 61–76) at the end of WCD use with therapy optimization. Women had an insufficient heart rate control with resting heart rate ≥70 bpm in 59% at the beginning of WCD use that decreased to 44% at the end of WCD use, but still remained surprisingly high. Interestingly, there were 21% of the women starting with HR ≥70 bpm at the beginning of use (BOU) who achieved adequate heart rate control by the end of use (EOU). Interestingly, 6% of women with adequate heart rate control at the start of therapy optimization ended up having higher heart rates >70 bpm at the end of the therapy optimization time period (Figure). Figure 1 Conclusions A significant proportion of women with heart failure and low ejection fraction do not reach an adequate heart rate control during the time of beta blocker initiation/titration. The wearble cardioverter defibrillator is a monitoring device that has been demonstrated in this study to appropriately identify patients with inadequate heart rate control at the end of the therapy optimization period. The WCD could be utilized to improve management of beta-blocker therapy in women and improve the achievement of adequate heart rate control in women.

2013 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuki Oshima ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Kimi Koide ◽  
Yuji Nagatomo ◽  
Toshiyuki Nagai ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. S76-S77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalal K. Ghali ◽  
Ileana L. Pina ◽  
Jun R. Chiong ◽  
Daniel J. Lenihan ◽  
Lynne E. Wagoner ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads E Jørgensen ◽  
Gunnar H Gislason ◽  
Christian Torp-Pedersen ◽  
Mark Hlatky ◽  
C harlotte Andersson

Objective: Beta blocker therapy in patients undergoing surgery is being revisited. Previous studies have demonstrated increased risks of perioperative adverse outcomes associated with beta blocker therapy, but whether some beta blocker subtypes may be superior to others remains unknown. Methods: Using nationwide Danish registries we included all non-cardiac surgeries in patients without heart failure or myocardial infarction in 2005-2011. Patients were grouped according to beta blocker use prior to surgery. Risks of 30-day MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events; non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or cardiovascular death) were estimated using logistic regression models adjusted for gender, age, body mass index, pharmacotherapy, comorbidities, type of surgery and surgery risk. Results: We included 607,338 patients in the study. Patients on beta blockers (n=50,480) were older with similar gender distribution (mean age 66 years [sd=12.9], 45%male) compared with patients not on beta blockers (n=556,858) (mean age 52 years [sd=17.6], 44%male). Patients on beta blockers had more comorbidities and received more pharmacotherapy (all p<0.001). Unadjusted absolute risks of MACE were increased with all beta blocker subtypes (range 1.7% for propranolol to 4.2% for sotalol) compared with untreated patients (0.8%). Odds ratios for the risk of 30-day MACE are shown in the Figure Conclusion: Patients without chronic heart failure and prior myocardial infarction were at increased risk of 30-day perioperative MACE when treated with beta blockers, with the exception of bisoprolol. Patients treated with carvedilol seemed to be at especially high risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document