scholarly journals 681 Ventricular fibrosis affects diastolic function and atrial remodelling long-term after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Tadiello ◽  
Laura Trento ◽  
Martina Setti ◽  
Giorgia De Conti ◽  
Francesco Onorati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Myocardial Fibrosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Atrial Function ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Ventricular Performance

Abstract Aims Aortic stenosis (AS) is characterized both by progressive valve narrowing and left ventricular remodelling response. Myocardial fibrosis has significant functional consequences and is the key pathological process driving left ventricular decompensation. Furthermore, studies suggest that myocardial fibrosis is irreversible, despite surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The study aims to define the association between myocardial fibrosis and long-term diastolic and atrial function after SAVR, which are both markers of poor clinical outcomes. Methods We evaluated patients with isolated AS and no-coronary artery disease referred for SAVR in 2015. All of them received a biological valve and a left ventricular biopsy was performed at the time of surgery. Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation was performed before surgery and after about 6 years, including fully automated 2D speckle tracking analysis software (TomTec). Atrial function was evaluated with PALS, PACS, and LAVi/septal a’ TDI. Results Nineteen patients completed the follow-up and formed the study cohort, age 72 ± 6 years, 42% female, ejection fraction 63 ± 6.4%, mean fibrosis 26.4 ± 12.7%. Significant myocardial fibrosis (> 33%) was found in 13/19 patients (68%). Although similar at baseline, after 5.6±0.5 years, PACS was significantly higher in patients with low myocardial fibrosis (13.7±4.2 vs. 8.0±3.8, P=0.01), the same trends were observed for PALS (24.1±7.9 vs. 17.0±6.6, P=0.07) and LAVi/septal a’TDI (5.4±1.3 vs. 7.4±2.8, P=0.06). The diastolic profile at long term follow-up was also significantly worsened in patients with LV fibrosis: E/A 0.9±0.3 vs. 1.3±0.4 P= 0.03 and E/e’ 10.6±3.3 vs. 16.6±4.5 P=0.01). Conclusions Myocardial fibrosis at the time of SAVR strongly influences long-term diastolic Doppler profile and atrial function with potentially harmful consequences on clinical status and ventricular performance.

scholarly journals Changes in dynamic left ventricular function, assessed by the strain-volume loop, relate to reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-422
Author(s):  
Hugo G. Hulshof ◽  
Frederieke van Oorschot ◽  
Arie P. van Dijk ◽  
Maria T. E. Hopman ◽  
Keith P. George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
Insight Into

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) leads to remodeling of the left ventricle (LV). Adopting a novel technique to examine dynamic LV function, our study explored whether post-AVR changes in dynamic LV function and/or changes in aortic valve characteristics are associated with LV mass regression during follow-up. We retrospectively analyzed 30 participants with severe aortic stenosis who underwent standard transthoracic echocardiographic assessment before AVR [88 (IQR or interquartile range: 22–143) days], post-AVR [13 (6–22) days], and during follow-up [455 (226–907) days]. We assessed standard measures of LV structure, function, and aortic valve characteristics. Novel insight into dynamic LV function was provided through a four-chamber image by examination of the temporal relation between LV longitudinal strain (ε) and volume (ε-volume loops), representing the contribution of LV mechanics to volume change. AVR resulted in immediate changes in structural valve characteristics, alongside a reduced LV longitudinal peak ε and improved coherence between the diastolic and systolic part of the ε-volume loop (all P < 0.05). Follow-up revealed a decrease in LV mass ( P < 0.05) and improvements in LV ejection fraction and LV longitudinal peak ε ( P < 0.05). A significant relationship was present between decline in LV mass during follow-up and post-AVR improvement in coherence of the ε-volume loops ( r = 0.439, P = 0.03), but not with post-AVR changes in aortic valve characteristics or LV function (all P > 0.05). We found that post-AVR improvements in dynamic LV function are related to long-term remodeling of the LV. This highlights the potential importance of assessing dynamic LV function for cardiac adaptations in vivo. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Combining temporal measures of left ventricular longitudinal strain and volume (strain-volume loop) provides novel insights in dynamic cardiac function. In patients with aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement, postsurgical changes in the strain-volume loop are associated with regression of left ventricular mass during follow-up. This provides novel insight into the relation between postsurgery changes in cardiac hemodynamics and long-term structural remodeling, but also supports the potential utility of the assessment of dynamic cardiac function.

scholarly journals A national study of the outcome after treatment of critical aortic stenosis in the neonate

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1321-1327
Author(s):  
Cecilia Kjellberg Olofsson ◽  
Katarina Hanseus ◽  
Jens Johansson Ramgren ◽  
Mats Johansson Synnergren ◽  
Jan Sunnegårdh
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
National Study ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Critical Aortic Stenosis

AbstractObjective:This study describes short-term and long-term outcome after treatment of critical valvular aortic stenosis in neonates in a national cohort, with surgical valvotomy as first choice intervention.Methods:All neonates in Sweden treated for critical aortic stenosis between 1994 and 2016 were included. Patient files were analysed and cross-checked against the Swedish National Population Registry as of December 2017, giving complete survival data. Diagnosis was confirmed by reviewing echo studies. Critical aortic stenosis was defined as valvular stenosis with duct-dependent systemic circulation or depressed left ventricular function. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were reintervention and aortic valve replacement.Results:Sixty-one patients were identified (50 boys, 11 girls). Primary treatment was surgical valvotomy in 52 neonates and balloon valvotomy in 6. Median age at initial treatment was 5 days (0–26), and median follow-up time was 10.8 years (0.14–22.6). There was no 30-day mortality but four late deaths. Freedom from reintervention was 66%, 61%, 54%, 49%, and 46% at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Median time to reintervention was 3.4 months (4 days to 17.3 years). Valve replacement was performed in 23 patients (38%).Conclusions:Surgical valvotomy is a safe and reliable treatment in these critically ill neonates, with no 30-day mortality and long-term survival of 93% in this national study. At 10 years of age, reintervention was performed in 54% and at end of follow-up 38% had had an aortic valve replacement.

Abstract 2865: Enhanced Left Ventricular Mass Regression Following Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival: A 15-year Study

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayyaz Ali ◽  
Amit Patel ◽  
Yasir Abu-Omar ◽  
Anila Mehta ◽  
Ziad Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Background Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is followed by regression of LVH. More complete resolution of LVH is suggested to be associated with superior clinical outcomes, however its impact on long-term survival following AVR has not been investigated. Methods Demographic and clinical data were obtained retrospectively through casenote review. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to measure LVM pre-operatively and at annual follow-up visits. Patients were grouped according to their reduction in LVM at late follow-up: Group A < 25 grams, Group B 25–150 grams and Group C > 150 grams. Results 211 patients underwent AVR between 1 st January 1991 and 1 st January 2001. Pre-operative LVM was 295 ± 118 g in A (n=63), 346 ± 97 g in B (n=75) and 539 ± 175 g in C (n=73), P <0.001. Mean time to last echocardiogram was 6.4 ± 3.3 years. LVM at late follow-up was 351 ± 160 g in A, 265 ± 95 g in B and 270 ± 90 g in C, P <0.001. Transvalvular gradients at follow-up were not significantly differerent between groups (A: 21 ± 21 mm Hg, B: 20 ± 15 mm Hg, C: 14 ± 11 mm Hg), P = 0.10. There was no difference in the prevalence of other factors influencing LVM regression such as IHD or hypertension. Ten year actuarial survival was significantly greater in patients with enhanced LVM regression when compared with the log-rank test (A: 49% ± 7, B: 67%± 6, C: 75% ± 6), P =0.03 (Figure 1 ). LVM reduction > 150 grams was an independent predictor of long-term survival on multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). Conclusion Enhanced LVM regression at late follow-up in patients undergoing AVR is associated with improved long-term survival. Strategies to optimize post-operative LVM regression should be considered in view of potential prognostic benefit.

scholarly journals Cause of Death After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: SWEDEHEART Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Glaser ◽  
Michael Persson ◽  
Anders Franco‐Cereceda ◽  
Ulrik Sartipy
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
General Population ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratios

Background Prior studies showed that life expectancy in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) was lower than in the general population. Explanations for this shorter life expectancy are unknown. The aim of this nationwide, observational cohort study was to investigate the cause‐specific death following surgical AVR. Methods and Results We included 33 018 patients who underwent primary surgical AVR in Sweden between 1997 and 2018, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting. The SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web‐System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence‐Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) register and other national health‐data registers were used to obtain and characterize the study cohort and to identify causes of death, categorized as cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, or other causes of death. The relative risks for cause‐specific mortality in patients who underwent AVR compared with the general population are presented as standardized mortality ratios. During a mean follow‐up period of 7.3 years (maximum 22.0 years), 14 237 (43%) patients died. The cumulative incidence of death from cardiovascular, cancer‐related, or other causes was 23.5%, 8.3%, and 11.6%, respectively, at 10 years, and 42.8%, 12.8%, and 23.8%, respectively, at 20 years. Standardized mortality ratios for cardiovascular, cancer‐related, and other causes of death were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.75–1.83), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97–1.04), and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05–1.12), respectively. Conclusions We found that life expectancy following AVR was lower than in the general population. Lower survival after AVR was explained by an increased relative risk of cardiovascular death. Future studies should focus on the role of earlier surgery in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis and on optimizing treatment and follow‐up after AVR. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02276950.

Abstract 9947: Predictors of Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Egbe ◽  
Joeseph Poterucha ◽  
Carole Warnes
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Aortic Valve Disease ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: Predictors of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) have not been studied. Objective was to determine prevalence and predictors of early and late LVD at 1 and 5 years post-AVR. Methods: Retrospective review of 247 patients (Age 63±8 years, males 81%) with moderate/severe MAVD who underwent AVR at the Mayo Clinic from 1994-2013. Only patients with follow-up data at 1 year post AVR were included (n=239). Cohort divided into 3 groups based on data collected prior to AVR, 1 and 5 years post AVR. LVD was defined as ejection fraction <50%. Results: LVD was present in 11/239 at baseline. At 1-year post AVR, 181 had normal EF (group 1) while 58/239 (24%) had early LVD (group 2). Predictors of LVD were atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83 confidence interval [CI] 1.59-1.98, p=0.001), age >70 years (HR: 3.12, CI: 2.33-4.18, p= <0.0001), CABG (HR: 2.17, CI: 2.24-5.93, p= <0.0001), and severe MAVD pre-operatively (HR: 2.87, CI: 2.33-3.17, p= 0.01), and hypertension (HR: 1.83, CI: 1.35-2.46, p= <0.0001). Prevalence of late LVD was 24% (47/197-group 3) and LVMI at 1 year post AVR was predictive of late LVD (HR 1.65, CI 1.11-3.8 per 10 g/ m 2 increment, p= 0.04)). Group 2 had less reverse LV remodeling compared to group 1 at 1 year post AVR (142±39 vs 129±42 g/ m 2 , p=0.02). Conclusions: Risk of LVD was significant even in subset of patients with moderate MAVD. Risk stratification of MAVD should be based on both clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Our data suggest earlier surgical intervention may be required in the MAVD population to prevent postoperative LVD but further studies are needed. Figure legend: FU: follow up

Abstract 15741: Long Term Survival Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Single US High Volume Center

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo O Escarcega ◽  
Rebecca Torguson ◽  
Marco A Magalhaes ◽  
Nevin C Baker ◽  
Sa’ar Minha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Introduction: Mortality following Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported up to 5 years. However, mortality after 5 years remains unclear. Hypothesis: We aim to determine the mortality in patients undergoing TAVR >5 years follow up. Methods: From our institution’s prospectively collected TAVR database we analyzed all patients undergoing TAVR to a maximum follow up of 8 years. We divided our population into transapical TAVR (TA-TAVR) and transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 511 patients who underwent TAVR were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TA-TAVR had higher rates of peripheral vascular disease compared with TF-TAVR (56% vs 29%, p<0.001) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (10.9 ± 4 vs 9.2 ± 4, p<0.001). TA-TAVR was associated with higher mortality at 1 year (32% vs 21%, p=0.01). However, there was no significant difference in very-long term mortality of patients undergoing TA-TAVR vs TF-TAVR (Figure). Conclusions: Long-term mortality following TAVR surpasses 50%. While in the first 2 years TA-TAVR is associated with higher mortality rates after three years the survival rates are similar in both approaches.

scholarly journals Indications and predictors for pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement with bioprostheses: the CAREAVR study

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-404
Author(s):  
Samuli J Salmi ◽  
Tuomo Nieminen ◽  
Juha Hartikainen ◽  
Fausto Biancari ◽  
Joonas Lehto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Atrioventricular Block ◽  
Sick Sinus Syndrome ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract OBJECTIVES We sought to study the indications, long-term occurrence, and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement with bioprostheses. METHODS The CAREAVR study included 704 patients (385 females, 54.7%) without a preoperative PPI (mean ± standard deviation age 75 ± 7 years) undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement at 4 Finnish hospitals between 2002 and 2014. Data were extracted from electronic patient records. RESULTS The follow-up was median 4.7 years (range 1 day to 12.3 years). Altogether 56 patients received PPI postoperatively, with the median 507 days from the operation (range 6 days to 10.0 years). The PPI indications were atrioventricular block (31 patients, 55%) and sick sinus syndrome (21 patients, 37.5%). For 4 patients, the PPI indication remained unknown. A competing risks regression analysis (Fine–Gray method), adjusted with age, sex, diabetes, coronary artery disease, preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, AF at discharge and urgency of operation, was used to assess risk factors for PPI. Only AF at discharge (subdistribution hazard ratio 4.34, 95% confidence interval 2.34–8.03) was a predictor for a PPI. CONCLUSIONS Though atrioventricular block is the major indication for PPI after surgical aortic valve replacement, &gt;30% of PPIs are implanted due to sick sinus syndrome during both short-term follow-up and long-term follow-up. Postoperative AF versus sinus rhythm conveys &gt;4-fold risk of PPI. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02626871

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document