Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL) can be performed with fluoroscopy (Fluo) or 3-dimensional (3D) electroanatomic mapping and contact force (CF) catheters. Local impedance (LI) is an alternative but no comparisons have yet been made. METHODS. An observational study comparing Fluo, CF- and LI-guided RFA for CTI-AFL. In the LI group, if CTI block was not obtained after initial ablation, ultra-high density mapping (UHDm) was used to identify breakthrough sites. Contact was determined using patient specific LI; RF delivered until 20 ohm LI drop seen, or LI drop plateaued >2 secs. In the CF group 10-40g force was used. Power was limited to 40-50W in all groups. Total RFA time, time from RFA start to CTI block, no. of lesions required to achieve block, acute success, complications and re-ablation during follow-up were analysed using ANOVA. RESULTS. Data presented for 24 patients (7 Fluo, 7 CF, 10 LI). Mean RFA time: 6.6, 5.9, 3.2 min respectively (p = 0.0478). Statistically significant differences also seen with LI vs Fluo (p = 0.0451) and LI vs CF (p = 0.0313). Time from first RFA to block: 25.5, 19.8, 14.2 min (p = 0.5688); number of lesions to achieve block: 8.5, 10.3, 8 (p = 0.3909). 100% success and no complications in all groups. 0% need for re-ablation (16.3 ± 7, 12.6 ± 8, 6.5 ± 4.4 months follow-up). DISCUSSION. This data illustrates that UHDm and LI-guidance significantly reduces the amount of CTI RFA, by 52% and 47% vs Fluo and CF respectively (p = sig, fig. 1). A reduction from first RFA to block is also seen (43% and 37%; p = ns, fig. 2). Given no difference in the no. of lesions, LI-guided RFA during lesion formation shortens the duration of each lesion. Many patients require further RFA (+/- mapping) if they do not achieve block following the initial ablation line, resulting in longer procedures. Several patients without block in the LI group underwent repeat UHDm, which quickly identified CTI or epicardial-endocardial breakthrough (fig. 3 & 4), allowing rapid targeting for re-ablation. In the fluo group, these procedures would often be significantly prolonged, meaning extensive RFA and radiation exposure. Fig. 1 shows smaller error bars with LI compared to the others, resulting in more predictable total ablation times; this could potentially benefit procedure scheduling (more procedures per unit time). We could not directly compare overall procedure time as many in the CF group had CTI RFA combined with left atrial RFA. Multiple LI cases were performed fluo-free with only magnetic tracking. This may allow case scheduling without a radiographer, with potential cost savings. CONCLUSION. LI-guided CTI-AFL RFA is safe and effective and has shown favourable ablation metrics compared to Fluo or CF-RFA. LI-RFA with UHDm more quickly and accurately identifies breakthrough and with fluoro-free technique could possibly reduce procedure time and cost. A larger study is planned to provide more insight.
Abstract Figures
216-13: Does higher contact force impair lesion formation at the cavotricuspid isthmus? Insights from MR-guided ablation of atrial flutter
