Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation via superior vena cava approach in a patient with interruption of the inferior vena cava

EP Europace ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 746-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kato ◽  
S. Kubota ◽  
Y. Yamada ◽  
T. Kumamoto ◽  
Y. Takasawa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Narikawa ◽  
Masayoshi Kiyokuni ◽  
Junya Hosoda ◽  
Toshiyuki Ishikawa

Abstract Background Transseptal puncture and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are generally performed via the inferior vena cava (IVC). However, in cases where the IVC is inaccessible, a specific strategy may be needed. Case summary An 86-year-old woman with paroxysmal AF and an IVC filter in situ was referred to our hospital for ablation therapy. An IVC filter for pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis had been implanted 15 years prior, therefore we selected a transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE)-guided transseptal puncture using a superior vena cava (SVC) approach. After the single transseptal puncture, we performed fast anatomical mapping, voltage mapping by multipolar mapping catheter, and then PVI by contact force-guided radiofrequency catheter using a steerable sheath. Following the ablation, bidirectional conduction block between the four pulmonary veins and the left atrium was confirmed by both radiofrequency and mapping catheter. No complications occurred and no recurrence of AF was documented in the 12 months after the procedure. Discussion When performing a transseptal puncture during AF ablation, an SVC approach, via access through the right internal jugular vein, enables the sheath to directly approach the left atrium without angulation and improves operability of the ablation catheter. Combining the use of general anaesthesia, TOE, a steerable sheath, and contact force-guided ablation may contribute to achieving minimally invasive PVI with a single transseptal puncture via an SVC approach.


1996 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 566-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Cem Alhan ◽  
lyas Kayacioğlu ◽  
Gülşah Tayyareci ◽  
Cantürk Çakalağaoğlu ◽  
Mustafa diz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-416
Author(s):  
G. M. Galstyan ◽  
M. V. Spirin ◽  
M. Yu. Drokov ◽  
I. E. Kostina ◽  
Ya. K. Mangasarova

Background. In the superior vena cava syndrome, vein catheterisation provides an alternative for vascular access. Few reports describe the usage of femoral ports.Aim. Description of pros and contras for femoral port installation in patients with haematological malignancies and the superior vena cava syndrome.Materials and methods. This prospective non-randomised, single-centre study included 163 haematological patients implanted 72 ports in superior vena cava, 35 — in inferior vena cava and inserted with 156 non-tunnelled femoral catheters. Catheterisation properties, complications, duration of use and reasons for port and catheter removal were registered.Results. No significant differences were observed between ports in superior and inferior vena cava as per the frequency of urokinase use in catheter dysfunction, catheter dislocation, catheter-associated bloodstream and pocket infections. Differences were revealed in the catheter-associated thrombosis rate, which was higher with femoral access (17.0 % or 0.9/1000 catheter days vs. 8.3 % or 0.2/1000 catheter days, p = 0.017). Ports in inferior vena cava had a lesser duration of use than in superior vena cava (p = 0.0001). Unlike femoral ports, non-tunnelled femoral catheters had higher rates of catheter-associated thrombosis (9/1000 vs. 0.9/1000 catheter days, p = 0.002) and infection (4.9/1000 vs. 0.3/1000 catheter days, p = 0.002). One lymphoma therapy course required one femoral port or 1 to 14 (median 3) non-tunnelled femoral catheters.Conclusion. Femoral port implantation is a necessary measure in patients with the superior vena cava syndrome. It has advantages in terms of catheterisation frequency, lower infectious and thrombotic complication rates compared to non-tunnelled femoral catheters.


2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 1650-1657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimie Ohkubo ◽  
Ichiro Watanabe ◽  
Takeshi Yamada ◽  
Yasuo Okumura ◽  
Kenichi Hashimoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document