scholarly journals Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) from a Public Health Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Erklavec ◽  
C Birt ◽  
N Pushkarev

Abstract European Common agricultural policy (CAP) can impact several health outcomes like increased antibiotic resistant infections, poor health of farm workers and unhealthy diets which lead to several non-communicable diseases. Rapid literature review of public health recommendations for a new CAP covers several topics from environment, pesticides, livestock and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to diet, food systems and others. Recommendations on pesticides are to periodically upgrade minimum standards of pesticides, reduce or abandon the use of pesticides and sustainable management of water quality in agriculture. In relation to livestock and antimicrobial resistance, EU should dedicate financial resources for programmes aimed at decreasing animal numbers, stop support for industrial livestock production through CAP subsidies and adopt low-antibiotics farming methods. To ensure better diet and food systems we need sustainable dietary guidelines, food labelling schemes, public procurement of healthy, local and seasonal foodstuffs, food education and campaigns, promoting food systems thinking at all levels, increase productivity of fruit and vegetable cultivation and social innovation in food supply chains. Other recommendations state that CAP should end support for wine sector and that CAP should include training, payment of adequate wages and health and safety standards, and lastly implementation of Health impact assessment of CAP. Agricultural policy is a very complex field with many stakeholders and consequently also implications on many levels. To make health a more visible and important objective, we need more public health experts to take part in advocacy for healthier CAP.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Tonkin ◽  
Trevor Webb ◽  
Julie Henderson ◽  
Paul R. Ward ◽  
John Coveney ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Consumer trust in food systems is essential for consumers, food industry, policy makers and regulators. Yet no comprehensive tool for measuring consumer trust in food systems exists. Similarly, the impact that trust in the food system has on health-related food behaviours is yet to be empirically examined. The aim of this research was to develop a comprehensive instrument to measure trust in the food system (the Dimensions of Trust in Food Systems Scale (DOTIFS scale) and use it to explore whether trust in the food system impacts consumers’ health-related behaviours. Methods The DOTIFS scale was developed using sociological theories of trust and pre-existing instruments measuring aspects of trust. It was pilot tested and content validity was assessed with 85 participants. A mixed-methods exploration of the health-related behaviours of 18 conveniently sampled Australian consumers with differing trust scores determined by the DOTIFS scale was then conducted. During March–July 2019 shopping- and home-observations were used to assess participants’ food safety practices and exposure to public health fortification programs, while the CSIRO Healthy Diet Score determined their adherence to national dietary guidelines. Results The DOTIFS scale was found to have high comprehension, ease of use and content validity. Statistical analysis showed scale scores significantly trended as predicted by participants’ stated level of trust. Differences were found in the way individuals with more or less trust in the food system comply with national dietary guidelines, are exposed to public health fortification programs, and adhere to recommended food safety practices. Conclusions The DOTIFS scale is a comprehensive, sociologically- and empirically- informed assessment of consumer trust in food systems that can be self-administered online to large populations and used to measure changes in consumer trust over time. The differences in health-related behaviours between individuals with varying levels of trust warrant further investigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Minotti ◽  
Lukáš Zagata

AbstractThis paper dives into the world of policy discourses to assess the extent to which the European agencies’ discourse of the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy incorporates the innovative impulses presented in the Common Food Policy proposal of the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (IPES food). The discourse analysis performed on European Commission and IPES food documents, showed fundamentally different foci and goals, proposed actions and understanding of the concept of sustainability. However, although the differences between the two discourses are still very large, the analysis points out that some features of the IPES food discourse are starting to become part of that of the European Commission.


2018 ◽  

As a public good, antimicrobial medicines require rational use if their effectiveness is to be preserved. However, up to 50% of antibiotic use is inappropriate, adding considerable costs to patient care, and increasing morbidity and mortality. In addition, there is compelling evidence that antimicrobial resistance is driven by the volume of antimicrobial agents used. High rates of antimicrobial resistance to common treatments are currently reported all over the world, both in health care settings and in the community. For over two decades, the Region of the Americas has been a pioneer in confronting antimicrobial resistance from a public health perspective. However, those efforts need to be stepped up if we are to have an impact on antimicrobial resistance and want to quantify said impact.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document