scholarly journals Nursing Home Satisfaction Surveys: Differences by Race, Age, and Gender

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Nicholas Castle ◽  
John Harris ◽  
David Wolf

Abstract Nursing home satisfaction information has gained substantial traction as a quality indicator representing the consumers perspective. However, very little research has examined differences in satisfaction related to race, age and gender. As a quality metric, satisfaction measures are variously used for quality improvement, benchmarking, public reporting, and for adjustment to payments. As such, valid comparisons among facilities are important. To our knowledge, no adjustment to satisfaction scores are currently used for nursing homes. However, in many other settings this is a common practice. In this research, nursing home resident, family, and discharge satisfaction scores were examined from >4,000 participants. The data were collected in 2020 and come from 420 facilities. Satisfaction information came from the CoreQ surveys, which include 23 individual questions four of which can be combined to produce an overall satisfaction score. These CoreQ nursing home surveys are endorsed by NQF. Generally lower overall satisfaction scores were found for family members compared to current residents or discharged residents. Minorities (Black, Asian, Hispanic) had lower overall satisfaction scores compared to whites; however, the differences were not significant at conventional levels. Participants of the lowest age (<65 years) were significantly (p=<.05) less satisfied than older participants (>75 years) and males were significantly (p=<.05) less satisfied than females. The findings indicate that some case-mix adjustment may be applicable for nursing home satisfaction scores.

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (4p1) ◽  
pp. 1337-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanlian Feng ◽  
David C. Grabowski ◽  
Orna Intrator ◽  
Vincent Mor

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. A29
Author(s):  
S. Dharmarajan ◽  
B.F. Banahan ◽  
J.P. Bentley ◽  
D. West-Strum

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Ottiger ◽  
Dirk Lehnick ◽  
Tobias Pflugshaupt ◽  
Tim Vanbellingen ◽  
Thomas Nyffeler

Background: Discharge planning of stroke patients during inpatient neurorehabilitation is often difficult since it depends both on the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) and the social context. The aim of this study was to define ADL cut-off scores using the Lucerne ICF-based multidisciplinary observation scale (LIMOS) that allow the clinicians to decide whether stroke patients who “live alone” and “live with a family” can be discharged home or must enter a nursing home. Additionally, we investigated whether age and gender factors influence these cut-off scores.Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to establish cut-off discharge scores for the LIMOS. Receiver-operating-characteristics curves were calculated for both patient groups “living alone” and “living with family” to illustrate the prognostic potential of the LIMOS total score with respect to their discharge goals (home alone or nursing home; home with family or nursing home). A logistic regression model was used to determine the (age- and gender-adjusted) odds ratios of being released home if the LIMOS total score was above the cut-off. A single-center prospective cohort study was then conducted to verify the adequacy of the cut-off values for the LIMOS total score.Results: A total of 687 stroke inpatients were included in both studies. For the group “living alone” a LIMOS total score above 158 indicated good diagnostic accuracy in predicting discharge home (sensitivity 93.6%; specificity 95.4%). A LIMOS total cut-off score above 130 points was found for the group “living with family” (sensitivity 92.0%; specificity 88.6%). The LIMOS total score odds ratios, adjusted for age and gender, were 292.5 [95% CI: (52.0–1645.5)] for the group “living alone” and were 89.4 [95% CI: (32.3–247.7)] for the group “living with family.”Conclusion: Stroke survivors living alone needed a higher ADL level to return home than those living with a family. A LIMOS total score above 158 points allows a clinician to discharge a patient that lives alone, whereas a lower LIMOS score above 130 points can be sufficient in a patient that lives with a family. Neither age nor gender played a significant role.


2006 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 060720074824042-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanlian Feng ◽  
David C. Grabowski ◽  
Orna Intrator ◽  
Vincent Mor

2020 ◽  
pp. 089801012094296
Author(s):  
Jorunn Drageset ◽  
Siw Eriksen Taasen ◽  
Birgitte Espehaug ◽  
Britt Moene Kuven ◽  
Wenche Mjanger Eide ◽  
...  

Aim: To investigate the association between nurse–patient interaction and sense of coherence among cognitively intact nursing home residents. Method: In a cross-sectional design, data were collected in 2017 and 2018 using the Nurse–Patient Interaction Scale (NPIS) and the 13-item Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-13). Of the 204 cognitively intact nursing home residents who met the inclusion criteria, 188 (92%) participated, representing 27 nursing homes. Multiple regression in a general linear model estimated the possible effects of the 14 NPIS items on SOC-13 sum score, the possible effects of the NPIS (sum score) on SOC-13 (sum score) as well as on the subdimensions of SOC-13, comprehensibility, meaningfulness, and manageability (both without and with adjusting for sex and age). Results: Four of the 14 NPIS items revealed highly significant correlations with SOC-13 (sum score; unadjusted and adjusted for age and gender). Furthermore, the analysis adjusted for age and gender showed significant associations for NPIS (sum score) with SOC-13 (sum score), manageability, and comprehensibility. The correlation between NPIS and meaningfulness was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Nurse–patient interaction is significantly associated with SOC-13 and its subdimensions of comprehensibility and manageability but not meaningfulness. Nurse–patient interaction might be an important resource in relation to residents’ sense of coherence and its subdimensions.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Felix ◽  
Anjali T. Naik-Polan ◽  
Christine Sloss ◽  
Lashaunda Poindexter ◽  
Karen S. Budd

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirby Gilliland ◽  
Robert E. Schlegel ◽  
Thomas E. Nesthus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document