scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A Lichtenberg ◽  
Jeanne A Teresi ◽  
Katja Ocepek-Welikson ◽  
Joseph P Eimicke
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Financial Decision ◽  
Screening Scale

Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Lichtenberg ◽  
Lisa Ficker ◽  
Analise Rahman-Filipiak ◽  
Ron Tatro ◽  
Cynthia Farrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Decision ◽  
Screening Scale

Reliability and validity of the polish version of the vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale (VASS)

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Karolina Filipska ◽  
Monika Biercewicz ◽  
Adam Wiśniewski ◽  
Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska ◽  
Robert Ślusarz
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Polish Version ◽  
Screening Scale

The Student Risk Screening Scale: A Reliability and Validity Generalization Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Kilgus ◽  
Katie Eklund ◽  
Daniel M. Maggin ◽  
Crystal N. Taylor ◽  
Amanda N. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Externalizing Behavior ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Validity Generalization ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Student Risk ◽  
Screening Scale

The purpose of this study was to conduct reliability and validity generalization meta-analyses of evidence regarding the Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS), a universal screener for externalizing behavior problems. A systematic review of the literature resulted in the identification of 17 studies inclusive of evidence regarding SRSS score (a) internal consistency reliability (i.e., alpha coefficients), and/or (b) criterion-related validity (e.g., correlations between the SRSS and various outcomes). Multilevel meta-analyses indicated that across studies, SRSS scores were associated with adequate internal consistency (α = .83). Analyses further suggested the SRSS was a valid indicator of both social and behavioral outcomes ( r = .52) and academic outcomes ( r = .42). Follow-up analyses suggested that in accordance with theory-driven expectations, the SRSS was a stronger indicator of externalizing problems and broad behavior outcomes relative to alternative outcomes (e.g., internalizing problems). Limitations and directions for future research are discussed, including recommendations for the collection of additional SRSS diagnostic accuracy evidence.

scholarly journals The reliability and validity of a screening scale for online gaming disorder among Chinese adolescents and young adults

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuechan Lyu ◽  
Tianzhen Chen ◽  
Zhe Wang ◽  
Jing Lu ◽  
Chenyi Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Online Gaming ◽  
Chinese Adolescents ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Gaming Disorder ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Screening Scale

Abstract Background In recent years, there have been frequent reports of gaming disorder in China, with more focus on young people. We developed and psychometrically tested a Gaming Disorder screening scale (i.e., Gaming Disorder Screening Scale - GDSS) for Chinese adolescents and young adults, based on the existing scales and diagnostic criteria, but also considering the development status of China. Methods For testing content and criterion validity, 1747 participants competed the GDSS and the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). After 15 days, 400 participants were retested with the scales for to assess test-retest reliability. Besides, 200 game players were interviewed for a diagnosis of gaming disorder. Results The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient on the GDSS was 0.93. The test-retest coefficient of 0.79. Principal components analysis identified three factors accounting for 62.4% of the variance; behavior, functioning, cognition and emotion. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit to the data (χ2 /df = 5.581; RMSEA =0.074; TLI = 0.916, CFI = 0.928). The overall model fit was significantly good in the measurement invariance tested across genders and different age groups. Based on the clinical interview, the screening cut-off point was determined to be ≥47 (sensitivity 41.4%, specificity 82.3%). Conclusions The GDSS demonstrated good reliability and validity aspects for screening online gaming disorder among Chinese adolescents and young adults.

Additional Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale at the High School Level

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Lynne Lane ◽  
Wendy P. Oakes ◽  
Robin Parks Ennis ◽  
Meredith Lucille Cox ◽  
Christopher Schatschneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
School Level ◽  
High School Level ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Student Risk ◽  
Screening Scale

scholarly journals The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale (LFDSS): A new tool for assessing financial decision making and preventing financial exploitation

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Lichtenberg ◽  
Lisa Ficker ◽  
Analise Rahman-Filipiak ◽  
Ron Tatro ◽  
Cynthia Farrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Financial Decision Making ◽  
Financial Exploitation ◽  
Financial Decision ◽  
Screening Scale

Psychometric Update of the Social Anxiety Screening Scale (SASS/EDAS) in a Spanish Adolescent Population

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 977-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Antonio Piqueras ◽  
José Olivares ◽  
María Dolores Hidalgo ◽  
Pablo Vera-Villarroel ◽  
Juan Carlos Marzo
Keyword(s):  
Social Anxiety ◽  
Temporal Stability ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Fit Indices ◽  
The Social ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Anxiety Screening ◽  
Future Work ◽  
Screening Scale

The aim of this work was to update the validation of the Social Anxiety Screening Scale (SASS/EDAS) in a sample of Spanish adolescents. To achieve this, one study with a sample of 1489 students in secondary education, of ages 14 to 17 years, were carried out. The psychometric properties of EDAS were examined through confirmatory factor analysis, reliability (Cronbach's alpha), temporal stability (test-retest), and concurrent criterion validity. The results supported the three-independent-factor structure (avoidance, distress and interference), that showed best fit indices compared to alternative models. They also showed that the scores of participants on EDAS scales were reliable in terms of internal consistency (α > .80) and moderately reliable concerning temporal stability (r= .48-.60) over a five-week period. The correlations between the EDAS factors and other social anxiety measures were positive and significant. Data provide empirical evidence of the estimation of reliability and validity of this scale. Future work should extend the validation of the EDAS in clinical samples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document