scholarly journals AGE- AND ETHNICITY-RELATED DISPARITIES IN TECHNOLOGY USE AMONG HIGH-RISK VETERANS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S333-S334
Author(s):  
Kiranmayee Muralidhar ◽  
Willy Marcos Valencia ◽  
Kaicheng Wang ◽  
Diana Ruiz ◽  
Carlos Gomez-Orozco ◽  
...  

Abstract Using predictive analytic modelling, the Veterans Affairs has identified Veterans considered to be High Need High Risk (HNHR) requiring increased support. This pilot study sent needs assessment questionnaires to 1112 HNHR Veterans to better understand gaps regarding technology use, access, physical function, and mobility. There were 341(30.7%) respondents: 270(80.4%) Non-Hispanic, 64(18.8%) Hispanic/Latino; 210(61.6%) White, 119(34.9%) Black/African Americans; and 310(90.4%) had ≥high school education. Average Barthel(ADL) score was 81.5±22.8 and Lawton(IADL) score was 5.8±2.2. Younger Veterans (age<70) were more likely able to use Internet ((117(65%) vs 74(46%)),(p≤0.01) and email (106(58.9%) vs 67(41.6%),( p≤0.01). They were also more likely enrolled in MyHealtheVet (87(48.3%) vs 58(36%),(p=0.043). Secure messaging was used by 62(34.3%) younger and 37(23%) older Veterans,(p=0.026). More higher functioning Veterans (140(55.1%)) used email than lower functioning (33(37.9%)),(p=0.018). Among higher functioning Veterans, 148(58.3%) were willing to use videoconference for care coordination and 116(45.7%) owned a smartphone or computer with camera for this; more than lower functioning Veterans (33(37.9%) and 28(32.2%)), (p≤0.01 for both). Less dependent Veterans preferred to be contacted via cellphone (88(62.4%)) or Internet (10(7.1%)) compared to the more dependent (96(48%) and 6(3%)) respectively (p=0.01). Only 71(44.1%) of older Veterans were willing to use videoconference (p≤0.01) and 54(33.5%) owned a smartphone or computer with camera,(p≤0.01). There are significant variations in technology use by age and ethnicity. However, although there are differences by functional ability, a significant number of disabled veterans are willing and able to use technology, and this may provide a way to address access barriers in this population.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e046051
Author(s):  
Alasdair F O'Doherty ◽  
Helen Humphreys ◽  
Susan Dawkes ◽  
Aynsley Cowie ◽  
Sally Hinton ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo investigate whether exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation services continued during the COVID-19 pandemic and how technology has been used to deliver home-based cardiac rehabilitation.DesignA mixed methods survey including questions about exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation service provision, programme diversity, patient complexity, technology use, barriers to using technology, and safety.SettingInternational survey of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes.ParticipantsHealthcare professionals working in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes worldwide.Main outcome measuresThe proportion of programmes that continued providing exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation and which technologies had been used to deliver home-based cardiac rehabilitation.ResultsThree hundred and thirty eligible responses were received; 89.7% were from the UK. Approximately half (49.3%) of respondents reported that cardiac rehabilitation programmes were suspended due to COVID-19. Of programmes that continued, 25.8% used technology before the COVID-19 pandemic. Programmes typically started using technology within 19 days of COVID-19 becoming a pandemic. 48.8% did not provide cardiac rehabilitation to high-risk patients, telephone was most commonly used to deliver cardiac rehabilitation, and some centres used sophisticated technology such as teleconferencing.ConclusionsThe rapid adoption of technology into standard practice is promising and may improve access to, and participation in, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation beyond COVID-19. However, the exclusion of certain patient groups and programme suspension could worsen clinical symptoms and well-being, and increase hospital admissions. Refinement of current practices, with a focus on improving inclusivity and addressing safety concerns around exercise support to high-risk patients, may be needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-624
Author(s):  
Arvind Rajamani ◽  
Karen Fernandez ◽  
Hailey Carpen ◽  
Upul Liyanage ◽  
Jeffery Zijian Wang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 991-993.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick G. Holt ◽  
Peter D. Sly ◽  
Hugh A. Sampson ◽  
Phil Robinson ◽  
Richard Loh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document