scholarly journals Recent Trends in Advance Directives at Nursing Home Admission and One Year After Admission

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. McAuley ◽  
R. J. Buchanan ◽  
S. S. Travis ◽  
S. Wang ◽  
M. Kim
2013 ◽  
Vol 257 (3) ◽  
pp. 555-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Billmeier ◽  
John Z. Ayanian ◽  
Yulei He ◽  
Michael T. Jaklitsch ◽  
Selwyn O. Rogers

Author(s):  
Liv Wergeland Sørbye ◽  
Liv Wergeland Sørbye ◽  
Hamran ◽  
Henriksen ◽  
Norberg

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 405-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary H. Palmer ◽  
Pearl S. German ◽  
Joseph G. Ouslander

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Yonis ◽  
K Bundgaard ◽  
R Noermark Mortensen ◽  
M Wissenberg ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest are at risk of anoxic brain damage that can lead to admission to nursing home or need of in-home care. However, studies on long-term outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest are scarce with previous research focusing on short term measures such as survival-to-discharge. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the composite endpoint of nursing home admission or anoxic brain damage among 30-day survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest within the first-year post-arrest. As a sub analysis, we also investigated the additional need of in-home care. Methods All in-hospital cardiac arrests in 13 Danish hospitals during 2013–2015 were identified from the DANARREST register. Inclusion criteria were indication for a resuscitation attempt and survival to day 30. Patients who, prior to arrest, already lived in a nursing home, and/or had anoxic brain damage were excluded. In the sub analysis patients who received in-home care prior to arrest were also excluded. The DANARREST data was linked to nationwide registries including the National Patient Register and administrative nursing home and home care registries using the Danish Civil Registration Number, a unique personal identification number that is given to every citizen in Denmark. Results The primary study population comprised of 454 (26.3%) 30 day-survivors out of 1723 eligible patients. Median age was 67 (Q1-Q3 57–75); 301 (66.9%) were men. In this group, the 1-year risk of anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission was 4.6% (95% CI 2.7%- 6.6%) with a competing risk of death of 15.6% (95% CI 12.3%-19.0%), leaving 79.8% alive without anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission at one-year follow-up (see Figure 1A). The sub study population comprised of 343 30-day survivors with a 1-year risk of anoxic brain damage, nursing home admission or need of in-home care of 23.6% (95% CI 19.1%-28.1%). The competing risk of death was 7.6% (95% CI 4.8%-10.4%), leaving 68.8% alive without anoxic brain damage, nursing home admission or need of in-home care at one-year follow-up (see Figure 1B). Figure 1 Conclusion The majority of 30-day survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest were alive at one-year follow-up without being diagnosed with anoxic brain damage, admitted to nursing home or without need of in-home care.


2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Robert J. Buchanan ◽  
Bonnie Chakravorty ◽  
Jane Bolin ◽  
Suojin Wang ◽  
Myungsuk Kim

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (S4) ◽  
pp. 222-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Schönstein ◽  
H.-W. Wahl ◽  
H. A. Katus ◽  
A. Bahrmann

Abstract Background Risk stratification of older patients in the emergency department (ED) is seen as a promising and efficient solution for handling the increase in demand for geriatric emergency medicine. Previously, the predictive validity of commonly used tools for risk stratification, such as the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR), have found only limited evidence in German geriatric patient samples. Given that the adverse outcomes in question, such as rehospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality, are substantially associated with cognitive impairment, the potential of the short portable mental status questionnaire (SPMSQ) as a tool for risk stratification of older ED patients was investigated. Objective To estimate the predictive validity of the SPMSQ for a composite endpoint of adverse events (e.g. rehospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality). Method This was a prospective cohort study with 260 patients aged 70 years and above, recruited in a cardiology ED. Patients with a likely life-expectancy below 24 h were excluded. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1, 3, 6 and 12 month(s) after recruitment. Results The SPMSQ was found to be a significant predictor of adverse outcomes not at 1 month (area under the curve, AUC 0.55, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.46–0.63) but at 3 months (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.54–0.68), 6 months (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.56–0.70) and 12 months (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.56–0.70) after initial contact. Conclusion For longer periods of observation the SPMSQ can be a predictor of a composite endpoint of adverse outcomes even when controlled for a range of confounders. Its characteristics, specifically the low sensitivity, make it unsuitable as an accurate risk stratification tool on its own.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document