Virtual element methods for the obstacle problem

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 708-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Wang ◽  
Huayi Wei

Abstract We study virtual element methods (VEMs) for solving the obstacle problem, which is a representative elliptic variational inequality of the first kind. VEMs can be regarded as a generalization of standard finite element methods with the addition of some suitable nonpolynomial functions, and the degrees of freedom are carefully chosen so that the stiffness matrix can be computed without actually computing the nonpolynomial functions. With this special design, VEMS can easily deal with complicated element geometries. In this paper we establish a priori error estimates of VEMs for the obstacle problem. We prove that the lowest-order ($k=1$) VEM achieves the optimal convergence order, and suboptimal order is obtained for the VEM with $k=2$. Two numerical examples are reported to show that VEM can work on very general polygonal elements, and the convergence orders in the $H^1$ norm agree well with the theoretical prediction.

Author(s):  
Fei Wang ◽  
Jikun Zhao

Abstract We establish a general framework to study the conforming and nonconforming virtual element methods (VEMs) for solving a Kirchhoff plate contact problem with friction, which is a fourth-order elliptic variational inequality (VI) of the second kind. This VI contains a non-differentiable term due to the frictional contact. This theoretical framework applies to the existing virtual elements such as the conforming element, the $C^0$-continuous nonconforming element and the fully nonconforming Morley-type element. In the unified framework we derive a priori error estimates for these virtual elements and show that they achieve optimal convergence order for the lowest-order case. For demonstrating the performance of the VEMs we present some numerical results that confirm the theoretical prediction of the convergence order.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharat Gaddam ◽  
Thirupathi Gudi

AbstractAn optimally convergent (with respect to the regularity) quadratic finite element method for the two-dimensional obstacle problem on simplicial meshes is studied in [14]. There was no analogue of a quadratic finite element method on tetrahedron meshes for the three-dimensional obstacle problem. In this article, a quadratic finite element enriched with element-wise bubble functions is proposed for the three-dimensional elliptic obstacle problem. A priori error estimates are derived to show the optimal convergence of the method with respect to the regularity. Further, a posteriori error estimates are derived to design an adaptive mesh refinement algorithm. A numerical experiment illustrating the theoretical result on a priori error estimates is presented.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 2557-2594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourenço Beirão da Veiga ◽  
Carlo Lovadina ◽  
Alessandro Russo

We analyze the virtual element methods (VEM) on a simple elliptic model problem, allowing for more general meshes than the one typically considered in the VEM literature. For instance, meshes with arbitrarily small edges (with respect to the parent element diameter) can be dealt with. Our general approach applies to different choices of the stability form, including, for example, the “classical” one introduced in Ref. 4, and a recent one presented in Ref. 34. Finally, we show that the stabilization term can be simplified by dropping the contribution of the internal-to-the-element degrees of freedom. The resulting stabilization form, involving only the boundary degrees of freedom, can be used in the VEM scheme without affecting the stability and convergence properties. The numerical tests are in accordance with the theoretical predictions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102
Author(s):  
Carsten Strzalka ◽  
◽  
Manfred Zehn ◽  

For the analysis of structural components, the finite element method (FEM) has become the most widely applied tool for numerical stress- and subsequent durability analyses. In industrial application advanced FE-models result in high numbers of degrees of freedom, making dynamic analyses time-consuming and expensive. As detailed finite element models are necessary for accurate stress results, the resulting data and connected numerical effort from dynamic stress analysis can be high. For the reduction of that effort, sophisticated methods have been developed to limit numerical calculations and processing of data to only small fractions of the global model. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the position of a component’s highly stressed areas is of great advantage for any present or subsequent analysis steps. In this paper an efficient method for the a priori detection of highly stressed areas of force-excited components is presented, based on modal stress superposition. As the component’s dynamic response and corresponding stress is always a function of its excitation, special attention is paid to the influence of the loading position. Based on the frequency domain solution of the modally decoupled equations of motion, a coefficient for a priori weighted superposition of modal von Mises stress fields is developed and validated on a simply supported cantilever beam structure with variable loading positions. The proposed approach is then applied to a simplified industrial model of a twist beam rear axle.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 251524592095492
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice ◽  
Steven W. Gangestad

Decisions made by researchers while analyzing data (e.g., how to measure variables, how to handle outliers) are sometimes arbitrary, without an objective justification for choosing one alternative over another. Multiverse-style methods (e.g., specification curve, vibration of effects) estimate an effect across an entire set of possible specifications to expose the impact of hidden degrees of freedom and/or obtain robust, less biased estimates of the effect of interest. However, if specifications are not truly arbitrary, multiverse-style analyses can produce misleading results, potentially hiding meaningful effects within a mass of poorly justified alternatives. So far, a key question has received scant attention: How does one decide whether alternatives are arbitrary? We offer a framework and conceptual tools for doing so. We discuss three kinds of a priori nonequivalence among alternatives—measurement nonequivalence, effect nonequivalence, and power/precision nonequivalence. The criteria we review lead to three decision scenarios: Type E decisions (principled equivalence), Type N decisions (principled nonequivalence), and Type U decisions (uncertainty). In uncertain scenarios, multiverse-style analysis should be conducted in a deliberately exploratory fashion. The framework is discussed with reference to published examples and illustrated with the help of a simulated data set. Our framework will help researchers reap the benefits of multiverse-style methods while avoiding their pitfalls.


Author(s):  
Andreas Dedner ◽  
Alice Hodson

Abstract We present a class of nonconforming virtual element methods for general fourth-order partial differential equations in two dimensions. We develop a generic approach for constructing the necessary projection operators and virtual element spaces. Optimal error estimates in the energy norm are provided for general linear fourth-order problems with varying coefficients. We also discuss fourth-order perturbation problems and present a novel nonconforming scheme which is uniformly convergent with respect to the perturbation parameter without requiring an enlargement of the space. Numerical tests are carried out to verify the theoretical results. We conclude with a brief discussion on how our approach can easily be applied to nonlinear fourth-order problems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne C. Brenner ◽  
Qingguang Guan ◽  
Li-Yeng Sung

AbstractWe present novel techniques for obtaining the basic estimates of virtual element methods in terms of the shape regularity of polygonal/polyhedral meshes. We also derive new error estimates for the Poisson problem in two and three dimensions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document