scholarly journals Health workers’ knowledge of safer conception and attitudes toward reproductive rights of HIV-infected couples in Kano, Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Zubairu Iliyasu ◽  
Hadiza S Galadanci ◽  
Ahmad A Zubairu ◽  
Taiwo G Amole ◽  
Nadia A Sam-Agudu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Transmission ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Reproductive Rights ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Safer Conception ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Safer Conception Methods

Abstract Background The restriction of reproductive rights of HIV-positive couples in low-resource settings could be related to the attitudes and skills of health workers. We assessed health workers’ knowledge of safer conception and their attitudes toward the reproductive rights of HIV-positive couples in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Methods A cross-section of health workers (n=294) was interviewed using structured questionnaires. Knowledge and attitude scores were analyzed. Logistic regression was employed to generate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for predictors of attitude. Results Safer conception methods mentioned by respondents included timed unprotected intercourse with (27.9%) and without antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (37.4%), in vitro fertilization plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (26.5%), and sperm washing and intrauterine insemination (24.8%). The majority (94.2%) of health workers acknowledged the reproductive rights of HIV-infected persons, although (64.6%) strongly felt that HIV-infected couples should have fewer children. Health workers reported always/nearly always counseling their patients on HIV transmission risks (64.1%) and safer conception (59.2% and 48.3% for females and males, respectively) (p<0.05). Among health workers, being older (30–39 vs <30 y) (AOR=1.33, 95% CI=1.13–2.47), married (AOR=2.15, 95% CI=1.17–5.58) and having a larger HIV-positive daily caseload (20–49 vs <20) (AOR=1.98, 95% CI=1.07–3.64) predicted positive attitude towards reproductive rights of HIV-affected couples. Conclusions Health workers had limited knowledge of safer conception methods, but were supportive of the reproductive rights of HIV-positive couples. Health workers in Nigeria require training to effectively counsel couples on their reproductive rights, risks and options.

Correlates of HIV-Positive Fathers’ Involvement in Prevention of Motherto- child Transmission Programs in Northern Nigeria

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-457
Author(s):  
Zubairu Iliyasu ◽  
Hadiza S. Galadanci ◽  
Bashir Muhammad ◽  
Fatima Z. Yadudu ◽  
Aminatu A. Kwaku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Condom Use ◽  
Hiv Transmission ◽  
Male Partner ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Consistent Condom ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Northern Nigeria ◽  
Male Partners ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Paternal Education

Background: The involvement of men in the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programs could accelerate the elimination of vertical transmission. Yet, little research has focused on HIV-positive male partners. This study determined predictors of male partners’ PMTCT knowledge and involvement in a tertiary hospital in northern Nigeria. Methods: A clinic-based sample of 401 HIV-positive male partners of women who delivered within 12 months prior were interviewed using structured questionnaires. PMTCT knowledge and involvement scores were computed. Adjusted odd ratios (AOR) for predictors were derived from multivariate logistic regression models. Results: The proportion of respondents with adequate PMTCT knowledge was 40.9%. Less than half (43.6%) of the respondents participated in PMTCT, with median involvement score of 2.00 (interquartile range, IQR = 0, 5.0). One quarter of respondents (25.7%, n =103) reported >1 sex partners, 10.5% consistently used condoms, and 20.7% had disclosed to all partners. Father’s involvement in PMTCT was predicted by paternal education (AOR = 0.30; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.12-0.77, no formal vs. post-secondary), HIV-positive child (AOR = 3.85; 95%CI: 1.41-10.54, yes vs. no), treatment duration (AOR = 4.17; 95%CI: 1.67-10.41, ≤1 vs. ≥10 years), disclosure to partner(s) (AOR = 1.21; 95%CI: 1.15-3.52, ‘disclosed to all’ vs. ‘not disclosed’), condom use (AOR = 5.81; 95%CI: 3.07-11.0, always vs. never), and PMTCT knowledge (AOR = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.31-0.92, inadequate versus adequate). Conclusion: The involvement of fathers in HIV PMTCT programs was low and predicted by paternal education, HIVpositive child, duration of antiretroviral treatment, disclosure to partner, consistent condom use, and level of PMTCT knowledge. Our findings will inform the development of policies to increase male partner involvement in PMTCT in Nigeria.

Pregnancy Outcomes Using Assisted Reproductive Technology After Fertility-Preserving Therapy in Patients With Endometrial Adenocarcinoma or Atypical Complex Hyperplasia

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aera R. Han ◽  
Yong-Soon Kwon ◽  
D. Y. Kim ◽  
J. H. Kim ◽  
Y. M. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Assisted Reproductive Technology ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Endometrial Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation ◽  
Reproductive Technology ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Asan Medical

Objectives:To evaluate the outcomes of pregnancy in young women (<40 years old) with early endometrial cancer or atypical complex hyperplasia who were treated by conservative management followed by assisted reproductive technology (ART).Materials and Methods:Medical charts of 11 patients treated from January 1997 to October 2007 at Asan Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. These patients had all been treated with progestin and serial dilatation and curettage as primary fertility-preserving therapies.Results:After pathological remission of disease, 10 patients tried to become pregnant by ART, 4 by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, and 6 by controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, with or without intrauterine insemination. Eight women had intrauterine pregnancies, and 6 patients had live births. Patients have been followed up for 9 to 51 months (mean, 21 months) after delivery, with no evidence of tumor recurrence.Conclusions:Fertility-preserving therapy followed by ART can be a good option in well-selected patients with early endometrial cancer who want to become pregnant.

scholarly journals Preterm and premature rupture of membranes in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dunja Tabs ◽  
Tihomir Vejnovic ◽  
Nebojsa Radunovic
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Premature Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Fertilization Program ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Preterm Premature Rupture ◽  
Natural Conception ◽  
Singleton Pregnancies

Women conceiving by assisted reproduction are at higher risk for preterm and premature rupture of membranes. The aim of our study was to estimate and compare incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in singleton pregnancies of women who conceived by intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization, from 1999 to 2003. We investigated 87 women from the intrauterine insemination, and 102 from the in vitro fertilization program. There were no statistically significant differences in regard to preterm and premature rupture of membranes: p>0.75 in two groups. The incidence of premature rupture of membranes was 2.30% (after intrauterine insemination) and 2.94% (after in vitro fertilization). There was no statistically significant differences in regard to preterm and premature rupture of membranes in women who conceived by insemination and in vitro fertilization. Estimated incidence of preterm and premature rupture of membranes was similar to the literature data and also similar to incidence after natural conception.

Male Infertility: Surgical Treatment (Varicocele, Microsurgical Reconstruction, TUR Ejaculatory Ducts)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa L. Dudley ◽  
Marc Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Ejaculatory Duct ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Nonobstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Donor Sperm ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

Male factor infertility contributes to at least half of all cases of infertility in couples. The most common causes of male factor infertility are impaired sperm production due to varicoceles, obstruction of the ductal system, and genetic defects causing nonobstructive azoospermia. A majority of these underlying conditions are treatable. Even when in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) is necessary, treatment of men has been shown to improve the outcomes of IVF-ICSI and potentially increase the chances of finding sperm with microdissection sperm extraction in some cases of nonobstructive azoospermia. Important advances in the field include abundant evidence now supporting microsurgical repair of varicocele in varicocele-associated nonobstructive azoospermia prior to IVF-ICSI or attempted surgical sperm retrieval. Advances in techniques for reconstruction of obstruction is dependent on the surgeon’s skill in creating a tension-free and leak-proof mucosa-to-mucosa accurate approximation with a good blood supply and healthy mucosa and muscularis and can result in higher patency rates. Treating the men often allows upgrading men from being solely candidates for donor sperm or adoption to candidates for ICF-ICSI with surgically retrieved testicular sperm to allowing IVF-ICSI with ejaculated sperm and from IVF-ICSI with ejaculated sperm to allowing the simpler intrauterine insemination and, finally, the possibility of a naturally conceived pregnancy. This review contains 27 figures, 1 table, and 69 references. Key Words: microsurgery, obstructive azoospermia, transurethral resection of the ejaculatory duct, varicocele, vasectomy reversal, vasoepididymostomy, vasography, vasovasostomy

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Optimal Treatment for Unexplained Infertility

2021 ◽  
pp. 246-250
Author(s):  
Stephanie Rothenberg ◽  
Joseph Sanfilippo
Keyword(s):  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Unexplained Infertility ◽  
Additional Benefit ◽  
Multiple Gestation ◽  
Time To Pregnancy ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

The treatment of unexplained infertility has traditionally been comprised of a stepwise treatment approach, first with ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination (IUI) and then with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Ovulation induction is first attempted with clomiphene citrate, and, if unsuccessful, injectable gonadotropins are used. The value of ovulation induction with injectable gonadotropins in couples with unexplained infertility has been questioned, however, given the high risk of multiple gestation and the increasing efficacy of IVF. To address this, the FASTT trial randomized couples with unexplained infertility to a treatment arm that either included or omitted gonadotropin/IUI. They found that an accelerated treatment approach that involved 3 cycles of clomiphene citrate/IUI and then progressed immediately to IVF resulted in a decreased time to pregnancy compared to the group who underwent gonadotropin/IUI for 3 cycles, as well as decreased cost per live birth. Therefore, it was concluded that treatment of couples with unexplained infertility with gonadotropin/IUI was of no additional benefit.

The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: a Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samettin Çelik ◽  
Canan Çalışkan
Keyword(s):  
Intrahepatic Cholestasis ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Intrahepatic Cholestasis Of Pregnancy ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Twin Pregnancies ◽  
Cholestasis Of Pregnancy ◽  
Ivf Et

Abstract Introduction Our study aims to evaluate the perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies diagnosed with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) and to compare these with normal healthy twin pregnancies for perinatal outcomes. The second outcome of the study was to determine whether in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) affects the perinatal outcome in ICP patients. Materials and Methods In this study, 59 ICP and 641 healthy twin pregnancies were compared for perinatal outcomes retrospectively. According to the mode of conception, the twin pregnancies with ICP were divided into 2 groups. The twin pregnancies with ICP who were conceived with IVF were referred to as the IVF-ET group. The twin pregnancies with ICP who were conceived spontaneously or by ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination (IUI) were referred to as the non-IVF-ET group. Results Twin pregnancies with ICP give birth significantly earlier than normal twin pregnancies (p ˂ 0.001). The diagnosis of ICP occurred significantly earlier in the IVF-ET pregnancy with ICP than in the non-IVF-ET group. In twin pregnancies with IVF-ET, patients delivered significantly earlier than in the non-IVF-ET group (p=0.002). Twin pregnancies with ICP were found to have significantly higher rates of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, postnatal intubation, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) than healthy twin pregnancies. Conclusions ICP is a risk factor for preterm delivery in twin pregnancies. In addition, ICP develops earlier and more frequently in twin pregnancies from IVF-ET than in those from non-IVF twin pregnancies, and the disease may be more serious.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document