Comparison of Larval Stored Product Beetle Mandibles by Light Microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope

1981 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-224
Author(s):  
John E Kvenberg
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscopy ◽  
Light Microscope ◽  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
Scanning Electron ◽  
Conventional Light Microscopy

Abstract Larval stored product beetle mandibles were studied by comparing images made by scanning electron microscopy with those made by conventional light microscopy. Discussion of morphological characteristics is based on illustrations of 25 species

scholarly journals Scanning Electron Microscopy Observations of Loa loa (Nematoda)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 486-492
Author(s):  
Jens Anibal Juul ◽  
Vegard Asgeir Forsaa ◽  
Tor Paaske Utheim ◽  
Endre Willassen
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscope ◽  
Loa Loa ◽  
Scanning Electron

We present a case report of periocular Loa loa. The key feature of L. loa distinguishing it from other human filarial parasites are cuticular bosses, which are presented in images from a light microscope and a scanning electron microscope. The cuticular bosses could be divided into three subtypes not previously described.

Mucilaginous film production by plant cells immobilised in a polyurethane or nylon matrix

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 2357-2363 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. C. Rhodes ◽  
R. J. Robins ◽  
R. J. Turner ◽  
J. I. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Thin Film ◽  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscope ◽  
Plant Cells ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Nylon Fibre ◽  
Scanning Electron

The surface features of plant cells immobilised in a matrix of either reticulated polyurethane foam or nylon fibre have been examined with the scanning electron microscope. It has been found that both cells and matrix are enveloped in a thin film, the appearance of which is very dependent on the method by which material is prepared for scanning electron microscopy. The structure is severely damaged by fixation and dehydration. Only in specimens examined in the frozen hydrated state is a structure seen compatible with that observed with the light microscope. From the way the appearance of the film is affected by different methods of preparation for the scanning electron microscope, it is suggested that the film is a hydrated mucilage. The importance of this film for the retention of cells within the matrix is discussed.

Scanning electron microscopy of sporangia of Coelomomyces

1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1325-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Bland ◽  
J. N. Couch
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscopy ◽  
Undescribed Species ◽  
Scanning Electron

The scanning electron microscope is used in an examination of the sporangia of 18 described and 3 undescribed species of Coelomomyces. As a possible aid to taxonomy, those species considered in this study are grouped into eight morphologically recognizable groups. The complementary use of light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy in studies of this type is emphasized.

Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Denticles and Eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 392-393
Author(s):  
John E. Ubelaker ◽  
Venita F. Allison
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscopy ◽  
Ascaris Suum ◽  
Slaughter House ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
Morphological Differences ◽  
Scanning Electron

Morphological differences between Ascaris of human and porcine origins have been difficult to detect. Sprent has distinguished the two species by the characteristics of the denticles observed by light microscopy. The present study is concerned with the differences in morphology of the denticles and with the examination of the ova of the two species as revealed by scanning electron microscopy.Hospital and slaughter house specimens were acquired locally, fixed in phosphate buffered paraformaldehyde and stored in 70% ethanol overnight. Preparative procedures for scanning electron microscopy were as previously reported. Specimens were examined in a JEOL JSMU-3 scanning electron microscope.The denticles of Ascaris suum are regular in distribution and conoid in shape (Fig. 1, A and B). Each denticle is cuspid; no multiple cusps were observed. The “molar teeth” forms previously described probably result from observations of cusps from which adhering debris was not removed in preparation.

THE ULTRA STRUCTURE OF INSECT SURFACES BY SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

1968 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. H. Salkeld ◽  
A. Wilkes
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscope ◽  
Solid Surfaces ◽  
Regular Pattern ◽  
Sensitive Detector ◽  
Scanning Electron ◽  
Television Tube

A recent development in microscopy certain to be of great interest to entomologists is the Scanning Electron Microscope. This machine overcomes the difficulties of studying solid surfaces with a standard light microscope and the problems of the extremely small limits of penetration of the electron microscope. This new microscope focuses a stream of electrons into a beam as small as 1 μ in diameter which moves over the surface of the specimen in a regular pattern, causing secondary radiations to emerge from the surface of the specimen. These are collected by a very sensitive detector and converted to an image similar to that produced by a television tube.

Preparing plant chromosomes for scanning electron microscopy

Genome ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Dillé ◽  
Douglas C. Bittel ◽  
Kathleen Ross ◽  
J. Perry Gustafson
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscopy ◽  
Plant Chromosomes ◽  
Cellular Debris ◽  
Scanning Electron

The scanning electron microscope may be useful in the analysis of plant chromosomes treated with in situ hybridization, especially when the probes and (or) chromosomes are near or beyond the resolution of the light microscope. Usual methods of plant chromosome preparation are unsuitable for scanning electron microscope observation as a result of cellular debris, which also interferes with probe hybridization. A method is described whereby protoplasts are obtained from fixed root tips by enzymatic digestion and applied to slides in a manner that produces little or no cellular debris overlying the chromosomes. The slides were examined by scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy after C-banding and in situ hybridization with a rye nucleolus organizer region spacer probe. This technique, which allows for scanning electron microscope visualization of bands and probes not easily identified with light microscopy, should prove useful in the physical mapping of low copy number or unique DNA sequences.Key words: protoplasts, rice, wheat, rye, physical maps, in situ hybridization.

scholarly journals Light and scanning electron microscopy of the same human metaphase chromosomes

1985 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-153
Author(s):  
C.J. Harrison ◽  
E.M. Jack ◽  
T.D. Allen ◽  
R. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Banding Pattern ◽  
Light Microscope ◽  
Chromosome Banding ◽  
Metaphase Chromosomes ◽  
Scanning Electron

A technique has been developed to examine the same G-banded human metaphase chromosomes, first in the light microscope and then in the scanning electron microscope (SEM). A structural involvement in chromosome banding was confirmed by a positional correlation between the G-positive bands observed in the light microscope and the circumferential grooves between the quaternary coils of the metaphase chromosomes, observed in the SEM. In further support of this the regions between the grooves showed a positional relationship with the G-negative or reverse (R) bands. The examination of slightly extended metaphase chromosomes in the light microscope demonstrated that the G-banding pattern corresponded to that described by the Paris nomenclature for metaphase chromosomes. The arrangement of the circumferential grooves of the same chromosomes, observed in the SEM, was shown to relate to that described by the Paris nomenclature for prometaphase chromosomes. Therefore, using the SEM it is possible to demonstrate the details of prometaphase banding in metaphase chromosomes.

Introductory Study of Scanning Electron Microscopy of Elytral Fragments of Stored Product Beetles

1974 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1235-1247
Author(s):  
Paris M Brickey ◽  
John S Gecan
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Light Microscope ◽  
Surface Features ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Scanning Electron

Abstract Eleven stored product beetles were examined for surface features of the beetle elytron, using a scanning electron microscope. The 3 characteristics, sculpturing pattern, setae, and setal pits, were well defined and could be used to distinguish the species examined. The scanning electron microscope can give 3-dimensional images at magnifications up to 20,000 ×, in contrast with the light microscope which has a maximum magnification of 1000 ×.

High Resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 478-479
Author(s):  
David Joy ◽  
James Pawley
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Electron Probe ◽  
Impact Point ◽  
Interaction Volume ◽  
Scanning Electron

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) builds up an image by sampling contiguous sub-volumes near the surface of the specimen. A fine electron beam selectively excites each sub-volume and then the intensity of some resulting signal is measured. The spatial resolution of images made using such a process is limited by at least three factors. Two of these determine the size of the interaction volume: the size of the electron probe and the extent to which detectable signal is excited from locations remote from the beam impact point. A third limitation emerges from the fact that the probing beam is composed of a finite number of discrete particles and therefore that the accuracy with which any detectable signal can be measured is limited by Poisson statistics applied to this number (or to the number of events actually detected if this is smaller).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document