scholarly journals Determination of Sulfamethazine in Swine and Cattle Feed by Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography with Post-Column Derivatization: Collaborative Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-268
Author(s):  
Robert L Smallidge ◽  
Kendrick Albert ◽  
Nancy L Britton ◽  
Harold M Campbell ◽  
Cheon-Seck Jeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Internal Standard ◽  
The United States ◽  
Reversed Phase ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Cattle Feed ◽  
Sample Extract ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract A liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the analysis of sulfamethazine (SMT) in complete swine and cattle feed was collaboratively studied. The method uses post-column derivatization with dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and detection at 450 nm. To 5 g finely ground feed, extractant (0.2N HCl + 1.5% diethylamine in 25% methanol), and internal standard solutions are added, and the SMT is extracted by shaking for 1 h. Clarified extract (high-level sample extract diluted to a target concentration of ca 5.5 μg/mL) is chromatographed on a C18 reversed-phase LC column with acetonitrile–2% acetic acid (17 + 83) mobile phase. Sulfamerazine is used as an internal, or surrogate standard to correct for variable recovery of sulfamethazine from a variety of feed matrixes. Six Youden matched-pair samples were sent to 10 collaborators in Korea, Canada, and the United States. Label claims on the commercial feeds ranged from 0.0077 to 0.22% SMT. The SMT mean recovery as determined from the 5 samples with known analyte content was 99.8%. The within-laboratory relative standard deviation (repeatability) ranged from 0.28 to 4.72%. Among-laboratory (including within-laboratory) relative standard deviation (reproducibility) ranged from 1.26 to 4.87%. The authors recommend the method for AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official First Action status.

scholarly journals Crude Fat, Hexanes Extraction, in Feed, Cereal Grain, and Forage (Randall/Soxtec/Submersion Method): Collaborative Study

2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 899-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J Thiex ◽  
Shirley Anderson ◽  
Bryan Gildemeister ◽  
W Adcock ◽  
J Boedigheimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Animal Feed ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Meat Products ◽  
The United States ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Cereal Grain ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Time Required

Abstract A method for determining crude fat in animal feed, cereal grain, and forage (plant tissue) was collaboratively studied. Crude fat was extracted from the animal feed, cereal grain, or forage material with hexanes by the Randall method, also called the Soxtec method or the submersion method. The use of hexanes provides for an alternative to diethyl ether for fat extractions. The proposed submersion method considerably decreases the extraction time required to complete a batch of samples compared to Soxhlet. The increase in throughput is very desirable in the quest for faster turnaround times and the greater efficiency in the use of labor. In addition, this method provides for reclamation of the solvent as a step of the method. The submersion method for fat extraction was previously studied for meat and meat products and was accepted as AOAC Official Method 991.36. Fourteen blind samples were sent to 14 collaborators in the United States, Sweden, Canada, and Germany. The within-laboratory relative standard deviation (repeatability) ranged from 1.23 to 5.80% for crude fat. Among-laboratory (including within) relative standard deviation (reproducibility) ranged from 1.88 to 14.1%. The method is recommended for Official First Action.

scholarly journals Crude Fat, Diethyl Ether Extraction, in Feed, Cereal Grain, and Forage (Randall/Soxtec/Submersion Method): Collaborative Study

2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 888-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J Thiex ◽  
Shirley Anderson ◽  
Bryan Gildemeister ◽  
W Adcock ◽  
J Boedigheimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Diethyl Ether ◽  
Animal Feed ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Meat Products ◽  
The United States ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Cereal Grain ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract A method for determining crude fat in animal feed, cereal grain, and forage (plant tissue) was collaboratively studied. Crude fat was extracted from the animal feed, cereal grain, or forage material with diethyl ether by the Randall method, also called the Soxtec method or the submersion method. The proposed submersion method considerably decreases the extraction time required to complete a batch of samples. The increase in throughput is very desirable in the quest for faster turnaround times and the greater efficiency in the use of labor. In addition, this method provides for reclamation of the solvent as a step of the method. The submersion method for fat extraction was previously studied for meat and meat products and was accepted as AOAC Official Method 991.36. Fourteen blind samples were sent to 12 collaborators in the United States, Sweden, Canada, and Germany. The within-laboratory relative standard deviation (repeatability) ranged from 1.09 to 9.26% for crude fat. Among-laboratory (including within) relative standard deviation (reproducibility) ranged from 1.0 to 21.0%. The method is recommended for Official First Action.

scholarly journals Method for the Rapid Determination of Protein in Meats Using the CEM Sprint™ Protein Analyzer: Collaborative Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1555-1561
Author(s):  
Cindy Moser ◽  
Kathy Herman ◽  
K Barnhardt ◽  
M Ceizyk ◽  
T Chriscoe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Rapid Determination ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Meat Products ◽  
The United States ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Binding Agent ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Dye Binding

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted to determine the protein content of raw and processed meat products by a protein-tagging and colorimetric technique. Meat products were prepared following AOAC Official MethodSM 983.18 and analyzed using CEM Corporation's Sprint Rapid Protein Analyzer. Sprint provides protein results by combining an accurately weighed test portion with a known amount of dye-binding agent. The dye-binding agent binds with the lysine, histidine, and arginine, as well as the n-terminus of the proteins commonly found in raw meat and processed meat products. Results are displayed and reported by the Sprint as a percentage (g/100 g) of protein. Ten blind duplicate study samples were sent to 10 collaborating laboratories in the United States. The within-laboratory (repeatability) relative standard deviation (RSDr) ranged from 0.91 to 3.04%, and between-laboratories (reproducibility) relative standard deviation (RSDR) ranged from 1.50 to 3.41% for protein. The method is recommended for Official First Action.

scholarly journals Determination of Clopidol Residues in Chicken Tissues by Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study

2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo-Fang Pang ◽  
Yan-Zhong Cao ◽  
Chun-Lin Fan ◽  
Jin-Jie Zhang ◽  
Xue-Min Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reversed Phase ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Chicken Muscle ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract Eighteen laboratories participated in a collaborative study on the determination of clopidol residues in chicken muscle tissues by liquid chromatography. Of these, results from 16 laboratories which rigorously followed the method were subjected to statistical analysis. The method performance was assessed by all participants using 14 samples of chicken muscle fortified at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 mg/kg. In addition, 9 participants each reported results for 6 clopidol-incurred samples in chicken muscle. Test portions were extracted with acetonitrile, and the extracts were purified with alumina and anion exchange resin solid-phase extraction cartridges in sequence. Clopidol was separated by reversed-phase liquid chromatography and quantified at 270 nm. Average recoveries ranged from 81.8 to 85.4%, reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) ranged from 11.9 to 22.6%, and repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) ranged from 9.9 to 15.1%. For clopidol-incurred samples at concentrations of 0.100–0.687 mg/kg, the mean determination value range was 0.099–0.659 mg/kg; RSDR was 12.6–19.8%, RSDr was 3.1–8.5%; and HORRAT values were 0.7–1.1. The accuracy and precision of the method are in conformity with the requirements specified by AOAC INTERNATIONAL. The method was adopted Official First Action in April 2003.

Multifunctional Column Coupled with Liquid Chromatography for Determination of Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in Corn, Almonds, Brazil Nuts, Peanuts, and Pistachio Nuts: Collaborative Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 1512-1521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary W Trucksess ◽  
Michael E Stack ◽  
Stanley Nesheim ◽  
Richard H Albert ◽  
Thomas R Romer
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Brazil Nuts ◽  
Pistachio Nuts ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract An AOAC/IUPAC collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifunctional column for the determination of aflatoxins. The test portion is extracted with acetonitrile–water (9 + 1), the extract is filtered, and the filtrate is passed through the column. The aflatoxins in the eluate are determined by reversed-phase liquid chromatography after derivatization with trifluoroacetic acid. Naturally contaminated corn, almonds, Brazil nuts, peanuts, and pistachio nuts spiked with total aflatoxins at 5,10,20, and 30 ng/g were sent to 12 collaborators in the United States, Denmark, France, Japan, and Switzerland. Eleven collaborators completed the study. Average recoveries of total aflatoxins for each spike level for the various commodities (excluding Brazil nuts at 5 ng/g) were 93,97,95, and 95%, respectively; the repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) ranged from 6.0 to 23.2% and the reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) ranged from 12.0 to 69.4%. The multifunctional column coupled with a liquid chromatographic method for determination of aflatoxins in corn, almonds, Brazil nuts, peanuts, and pistachio nuts has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

scholarly journals Immunoaffinity Column Cleanup with Liquid Chromatography Using Post-Column Bromination for Determination of Aflatoxin B1 in Cattle Feed: Collaborative Study

2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1179-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joerg Stroka ◽  
Christoph von Holst ◽  
Elke Anklam ◽  
Matthias Reutter ◽  
A Barmark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Aflatoxin B1 ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Immunoaffinity Column ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Cattle Feed ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an immunoaffinity column cleanup liquid chromatography (LC) method for determination of aflatoxin B1 in cattle feed at a possible future European regulatory limit (1 ng/g). The test portion was extracted with acetone–water (85 + 15), filtered, diluted with water, and applied to an immunoaffinity column. The column was washed with water to remove interfering compounds, and the purified aflatoxin B1 was eluted with methanol. Aflatoxin B1 was separated and determined by reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP–LC) and detected by fluorescence after post column derivatization (PCD) involving bromination. PCD was achieved with either pyridinium hydrobromide perbromide (PBPB), used by 14 laboratories, or an electrochemical cell and addition of bromide to the mobile phase, used by 7 laboratories. Both derivatization techniques were not significantly different when compared by the t-test; the method was statistically evaluated for all laboratories together (bromination and PBPB). The cattle feed samples, both spiked and naturally contaminatedwithaflatoxinB1, were sent to 21 laboratories in 14 different countries (United States, Japan, and Europe). Test portions were spiked at levels of 1.2 and 3.6 ng/g for aflatoxin B1. Recoveries ranged from 74 to 157%. Based on results for spiked samples (blind pairs at 2 levels) as well as naturally con-taminated samples (blind pairs at 3 levels), the relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) ranged from 5.9 to 8.7%. The relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) ranged from 17.5 to 19.6%. The method showed acceptable within-and between-laboratory precision for this matrix, as evidenced by HORRAT values, at the target levels of determination for aflatoxin B1. No major differences in RSD were observed, showing that the composition of the feeds was not a factor for the samples tested and that the method was applicable for all materials used.

Determination of pH of Soils by Different Methods: Collaborative Study

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yash P Kalra
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Organic Soils ◽  
Sodic Soils ◽  
Ph Measurements ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Mineral Soils

Abstract Fifty-three laboratories (including author’s) from Canada, India, Israel, and the United States participated in a collaborative study for the measurement of pH of different types of soils. A method with 2 alternative procedures was used for pH measurements of mineral soils (alternative I for soils containing less than 17⋊ organic carbon and alternative II for soils with variable salt content), a second method was used for saline-sodic soils, and a third method was used for organic soils (soils containing at least 17⋊ organic carbon). The pH was measured potentiometricaIly. The methods were selected by the Soil Science Society of America, S889 Committee on Coordination of Official Methods of Soil Analysis. Each laboratory used all 4 procedures to analyze 10 blind duplicate samples per procedure. The repeatability relative standard deviation values (RSDr) were 1.45–7.80% for mineral soils tested by the alternative 1,0.95–6.91% for mineral soils tested by the alternative II, 0.74–7.09% for saline-sodic soils, and 0.73–4.66% for organic soils. The corresponding reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values were 2.67–10.75%, 2.03–7.54%, 2.45–9.93%, and 2.15–6.32%. Repeatability and reproducibility data indicated that the results are within acceptable levels. The 3 methods for pH measurements of mineral, saline-sodic, and organic soils were adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

scholarly journals Determination of Water (Moisture) and Dry Matter in Animal Feed, Grain, and Forage (Plant Tissue) by Karl Fischer Titration: Collaborative Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J Thiex ◽  
Terri van Erem ◽  
D Amundson ◽  
J Boucher ◽  
A Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Animal Feed ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Extraction Procedure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Karl Fischer Titration ◽  
Karl Fischer ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract A Karl Fischer method for determining water (dry matter) in animal feed and forages was collaboratively studied. Water was extracted from animal feed or forage material into methanol–formamide (1 + 1) directly in the Karl Fischer titration vessel by high-speed homogenization. The water was titrated at 50°C with one-component Karl Fischer reagent based on imidazole. Ten blind samples were sent to 9 collaborators in the United States, Canada, and Germany. The within-laboratory relative standard deviation (repeatability) ranged from 1.14 to 6.99% for water or from 0.09 to 0.56% for dry matter. Among-laboratory (including within-) relative standard deviation (reproducibility) ranged from 5.35 to 10.73%, or from 0.44 to 0.77% for dry matter. The authors recommend that the method be adopted as Official First Action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL. A comparable alternative extraction procedure using boiling methanol is also recommended for Official First Action.

Immunoaffinity Column Coupled with Solution Fluorometry or Liquid Chromatography Postcolumn Derivatization for Determination of Aflatoxins in Corn, Peanuts, and Peanut Butter: Collaborative Study

1991 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary W Trucksess ◽  
Michael E stack ◽  
Stanley Nesheim ◽  
Samuel W Page ◽  
Richard H Albert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Relative Standard Deviation ◽  
Peanut Butter ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Affinity Column ◽  
Immunoaffinity Column ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract An AOAC/IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an immunoaffinity column for the determination of af latoxin. The test portion Is extracted with methanol- water (7 + 3), filtered, diluted to ⦟30% methanol with water, and applied to the affinity column. The column Is washed with water and the concentrated aflatoxins are eluted with methanol. Total aflatoxins are determined by solution fluorometry with bromine (SFB), and Individual toxins are determined by reverse-phase liquid chromatography with postcolumn derlvatizatlon with Iodine (PCD). Corn naturally contaminated with aflatoxins, and peanuts, peanut butter, and corn containing added aflatoxins ( B1:B2:G1G2 = 7:1:3:1) were sent to 24 collaborators In the United States, France, Canada, and the Republic of South Africa. Twelve collaborators used the SFB method, 9 used the PCD method, and 3 used both SFB and PCD methods. Twenty collaborators completed the study (10 used the SFB method, 7 used the PCD method, and 3 used both SFB and PCD methods). Test portions were spiked at 10, 20, and 30 ng/g. For SFB analyses, recoveries of total aflatoxins were 123,105, and 107%, respectively; the relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) ranged from 11.75 to 16.57%, and the relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) ranged from 10.97 to 33.09%. For PCD analyses, recoveries were 81, 81, and 83%, respectively; the RSDr ranged from 5.20 to 17.22%, and the RSDR ranged from 4.68 to 50.77%. The RSDr for aflatoxins B1, and G1 for spiked test portions ranged from 5.45 to 23.55%, and the RSDR ranged from 4.21 to 57.28%. The RSDr and RSDR for aflatoxins B2 and G2 were higher because of the small amounts added. Analyses by both SFB and PCD methods showed acceptable within-laboratory and betweenlaboratories precision. The method has been adopted official first action by AOAC as an AOAC-IUPAC method.

Quantitation of Cyfluthrin in Liquid and Solid Formulations by Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1335-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald N Harbin
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Internal Standard ◽  
Reversed Phase ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Pesticide Formulations ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Phase Liquid ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic

Abstract A liquid chromatographic (LC) method has been developed for quantitation of cyfluthrin (Baythroid®, Tempo®) in liquid and solid formulations. Cyfluthrin is a synthetic pyrethroid insecticide. Samples are dissolved in acetonitrile and analyzed by reversedphase LC with decanophenone as an internal standard. Seventeen laboratories from 7 countries participated in a collaborative study of the method. Each collaborator was provided with reference standard, internal standard, and matched pair samples of Tempo 20 wettable powder, Tempo 2 emulsifiable concentrate, and Tempo 2 flowable liquid formulations. Collaborators were instructed to use peak area measurements for quantitation. Relative standard deviations for reproducibility (RSDR) were 0.78,0.98, and 2.32, respectively. The LC method for determination of cyfluthrin in pesticide formulations has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document