Consumption Of The Sugar Substitute Stevia Leads To Cross-Reactivity Of CEDIA® Buprenorphine II Immunoassay

Author(s):  
Sabine Plattner ◽  
Marion Pavlic ◽  
Florian Pitterl ◽  
Birthe Schubert

Abstract Buprenorphine is a semi-synthetic opioid which is often used in opiate maintenance therapy. For this purpose, regular toxicological analyses of urine samples are mandatory. For fast analytical results, analyses are commonly performed by immunoassay, e.g. Thermo Scientific™ CEDIA® Buprenorphine or Buprenorphine II assay. One drawback of immunoassay-based methods are possible cross-reactions with other substances. Several structural related and unrelated drugs have already been checked for cross-reactivity to CEDIA® Buprenorphine II immunoassay. In contrast, cross-reactivities have not been checked for any food additives. In the present study, a cross-reaction of CEDIA® Buprenorphine II assay to steviol glucuronide was investigated. Steviol glucuronide is a phase II metabolite of the sugar substitute Stevia. For our study, 32 urine samples of patients in rehabilitation centers were collected. These samples tested positive with the CEDIA® Buprenorphine II immunoassay. These findings were suspicious, since it was highly unlikely that the patients in those institutions had access to buprenorphine. The absence or presence of buprenorphine in urine samples was evaluated by a validated gas chromatography mass spectrometry method. In order to determine the concentration of steviol glucuronide in urine samples, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method has been developed and fully validated according to the respective guidelines of the German Society of the Toxicological and Forensic Chemistry. Cross-reactivity of steviol glucuronide in the CEDIA® Buprenorphine II immunoassay was observed at concentrations above 15000 µg/L. These findings demonstrate that food additives should also be considered as compounds that may reduce the selectivity of immunoassays. This places emphasis on the importance of confirming implausible results by selective analytical methods.

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-574
Author(s):  
Grace M Kroner ◽  
Kamisha L Johnson-Davis ◽  
Kelly Doyle ◽  
Gwendolyn A McMillin

Abstract Background The psychoactive component of cannabis, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), is one of many cannabinoids present in the plant. Since cannabinoids have extensive structural similarity, it is important to be aware of potential cross-reactivity with immunoassays designed to detect THC metabolite. This is especially important as cannabinoid products are increasingly marketed as legal supplements. The objective of this study was to assess the cross-reactivity of 2 commercial immunoassays designed to detect THC metabolite with 4 cannabinoids: cannabidiol, cannabinol, cannabichromene, and cannabigerol. Methods Deidentified residual patient urine samples that tested negative for THC metabolite on initial testing were pooled and fortified with the above compounds to detect cross-reactivity. We next tested a range of CBN concentrations to determine what concentration of CBN was required to trigger a positive immunoassay result. Finally, we tested whether CBN has an additive effect with THC in the immunoassay by adding CBN to 21 samples weakly positive for THC by a mass spectrometry method but negative by the EMIT II Plus immunoassay. Results Both the EMIT II Plus assay and the Microgenics MultiGent assay demonstrated cross-reactivity with CBN. For the EMIT II Plus assay, about 5-fold more CBN than THC metabolite was required to produce an assay signal equivalent to the cutoff concentration, and CBN displayed an additive effect with THC metabolite. For the Microgenics assay, 20-fold more CBN than THC metabolite was required to cross the cutoff concentration. Conclusions These data may help guide the need for confirmatory testing when results of THC metabolite testing by immunoassay are inconsistent with expectations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document