Discrimination by Male Dogwood Borer, Synanthedon scitula (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae), Among Traps Baited with Commercially Available Pheromone Lures

2004 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Christopher Bergh ◽  
Tracy C. Leskey ◽  
Aijun Zhang
1985 ◽  
Vol 117 (12) ◽  
pp. 1471-1478 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Warner ◽  
S. Hay

AbstractObservations on Malus domestica (Borkh) in central Ontario between 1981 and 1984 revealed that dogwood borer (Synanthedon scitula Harris) larval feeding was primarily associated with burr knots on the above-ground portion of apple rootstocks. Trunk injuries also served as sites of entry. Monitoring with pheromones indicated moth emergence occurred from late June until early August with peak activity occurring near the middle of July. Control of the dogwood borer on apple was obtained with 2 trunk drench sprays of dimethoate, fenvalerate, permethrin plus oil, endosulfan, parathion, chlorpyrifos, or lindane when applied during the period of adult flight activity.


2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 2463-2479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aijun Zhang ◽  
Tracy C. Leskey ◽  
J. Christopher Bergh ◽  
James F. Walgenbach

EDIS ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamba Gyeltshen ◽  
Amanda Hodges

EENY-374, a 4-page illustrated fact sheet by Jamba Gyeltshen and Amanda Hodges, describes this destructive pest of flowering dogwood and other cultivated trees. Part of the Featured Creatures series, this publication covers the distribution, description, biology, host plants, damage, management, and selected references. Part of the Featured Creatures Collection. Published by the UF Department of Entomology and Nematology, May 2006. EENY-374/IN671: Dogwood Borer, Synanthedon scitula(Harris) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) (ufl.edu)


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 169-174
Author(s):  
A.K. Hagan ◽  
J.R. Akridge ◽  
J. Ducar ◽  
K.L. Bowen

Abstract Stellar® dogwood (Cornus florida × kousa) cultivars Aurora®, Constellation®, Celestial™, Ruth Ellen®, and Stellar Pink® were compared with selected flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) cultivars Cherokee Brave®, ‘Cherokee Princess’, ‘Cloud 9’, and ‘Rubra’ in a simulated landscape planting at sites in southwest (USDA Hardiness Zone 8a) and northeast Alabama (USDA Hardiness Zone 7a) for their reaction to the diseases spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot. Tree longevity as influenced by the occurrence of the dogwood borer (Synanthedon scitula) and an ambrosia beetle (Xylosandrus sp.) was also assessed at both sites. All Stellar® dogwood cultivars generally proved resistant to the bract and leaf spot phases of spot anthracnose as well as powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot. While Cherokee Brave® was the only flowering dogwood with partial resistance to powdery mildew at both sites; this and the other flowering dogwood cultivars were equally susceptible to spot anthracnose and Cercospora leaf spot. Insect damage levels were higher at the southwest site than the northeast Alabama site. Within 3 years of establishment at the southwest Alabama site, incidence of tunneling damage attributed to dogwood borer and an ambrosia beetle was higher on the Stellar® dogwood than flowering dogwood cultivars, which also had higher values for tree longevity. In contrast, tree longevity was equally high and insect damage equally low at the northeast Alabama site for both the Stellar® and flowering dogwood cultivars. Superb resistance to the diseases spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot translated into superior aesthetics and fall color for the Stellar® compared with the flowering dogwood cultivars at the northeast Alabama site. Hardiness of Stellar® dogwood cultivars in Alabama and possibly other southern states below USDA Hardiness Zone 7a is questionable due to tree vulnerability to the dogwood borer and ambrosia beetle.


1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Rogers ◽  
Jerome F. Grant

Infestation levels of dogwood borer [Synanthedon scitula (Harris)] on flowering dogwood (Cornus florida L.) in commercial nursery, urban, and forest habitats in eastern and middle Tennessee were measured during 1987 and 1988. The highest average infestation level (ca. 60%) was found in the urban habitat, where mechanical injury, e.g., damage caused by lawn mowers or string trimmers, may have provided oviposition or larval entry sites. Dogwood borer larvae were found in all nursery blocks examined, with ca. 7% of the trees infested/block. Infested trees are not marketable; thus, economic losses averaged ca. $l,800/block (x̄ = 1,770 trees/block) of dogwoods. Infestation levels were lowest (ca. 1%) in the forest habitat, where dogwoods grow as a natural component of the forest understory.


1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Pfeiffer ◽  
Joella C. Killian

‘Gala’ apple trees had a high incidence of burr knots (adventitious root primordia) produced on the trunk. Dogwood borer, Synanthedon scitula (Harris), infested many of these growths. Mating disruption using a sex attractant for dogwood borer, (Z,Z)-3,13-ODDA, did not control dogwood borer injury. In addition to other variables inherent to mating disruption (dispenser release and application rate, pest density, environmental factors), one potential reason for the failure was an inadequate conception of the dogwood borer sex pheromone composition. Therefore, the composition of dogwood borer pheromone should be reexamined. Traps baited with lilac borer, Podosesia syringae (Harris), lures were more sensitive for capturing dogwood borer males than traps baited with lures for dogwood borer. This is difficult to explain because the lures purportedly are identical. This difference in trap response further supports the need for reexamination of the pheromone blend compositions for each species. A complex of seven sesiids was attracted to both dogwood borer and lilac borer traps; captures of all were almost entirely eliminated by permeation with (Z,Z)-3,13-ODDA. There was a bimodal pattern of adult activity, with an early peak trap capture in May–June, and a later peak in July–August. The hypothesis of apple producing a later period of dogwood borer emergence than from dogwood was supported. This will complicate control in ‘Gala’ using current borer insecticides (e.g., chlorpyrifos, endosulfan) because of the proximity of harvest in this early-maturing variety with the ovipositional period of dogwood borer.


1985 ◽  
Vol 117 (11) ◽  
pp. 1367-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Riedl ◽  
R.W. Weires ◽  
A. Seaman ◽  
S.A. Hoying

AbstractThe dogwood borer, Synanthedon scitula (Harris), is a relatively new pest problem on apples. Larvae feed principally in burr knots on the above-ground portion of clonal rootstocks. According to a survey of 33 orchards on dwarf or semidwarf apple root-stocks, about 70% of the trees had burr knots. The tendency to develop burr knots was similar among the rootstocks examined in this survey. The proportion of trees infested with dogwood borer in an orchard ranged from 0 to 100% and averaged 30%. The dogwood borer overwinters in the larval stage (2nd to 6th instar) and pupates in the feeding tunnel. Emergence and pheromone-trap records indicate 1 generation a year. In western New York, adults begin to emerge in mid-June, peak in mid-July, and continue to emerge through September. In several tests conducted over a 3-year period, chlorpyrifos at 180 g/100 L provided the most consistent control. At this rate a single spray timed to first or peak egg hatch was as effective as 2 sprays. Latex paint applied by brush to the trunk at the beginning of the oviposition period also reduced the infestation. In established plantings, dogwood borer can also be controlled by berming with soil up to the graft union to prevent access to burr knots. Destroying burr knots chemically with naphthalene acetic acid will not eliminate an infestation and may invite other borer problems.


2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy C. Leskey ◽  
J. Christopher Bergh ◽  
James F. Walgenbach ◽  
Aijun Zhang
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document