scholarly journals The Association of Veterans’ PSA Screening Rates With Changes in USPSTF Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J Becker ◽  
Temitope Rude ◽  
Dawn Walter ◽  
Chan Wang ◽  
Stacy Loeb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
Psa Testing ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Preventative Services

Abstract Background In 2012, the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) formally recommended against all prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. Our goal was to characterize PSA screening trends in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) before and after the USPSTF recommendation and to determine if PSA screening was more likely to be ordered based on a veteran’s race or age. Methods Using the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, we created 10 annual groups of PSA-eligible men covering 2009-2018. We identified all PSA tests performed in the VA to determine yearly rates of PSA screening. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results The overall rate of PSA testing in the VA decreased from 63.3% in 2009 to 51.2% in 2018 (P < .001). PSA screening rates varied markedly by age group during our study period, with men aged 70-80 years having the highest initial rate and greatest decline (70.6% in 2009 to 48.4% in 2018, P < .001). Men aged 55-69 years had a smaller decline (65.2% in 2009 to 58.9% in 2018, P < .001) whereas the youngest men, aged 40-54 years, had an increase in PSA screening (26.2% in 2009 to 37.8% in 2018, P < .001). Conclusions In this analysis of PSA screening rates among veterans before and after the 2012 USPSTF recommendation against screening, we found that overall PSA screening decreased only modestly, continuing for more than one-half of the men in our study. Veterans of different races had similar screening rates, suggesting that VA care may minimize racial disparities. Veterans of varying ages experienced statistically significantly differences in PSA screening trends.

Implications of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on prostate cancer (PCa) stage migration.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5071-5071
Author(s):  
Iris Yeong- Fung Sheng ◽  
Yu-Wei Chen ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
Timothy D. Gilligan ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

5071 Background: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening has been controversial, given unrefined screening guidelines leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of “indolent” PCa. In 2008, the USPSTF recommended against PSA screening for men aged ≥75 and in 2012 broadened this recommendation to include all men. The impact of these changes is unstudied. We hypothesize that these screening changes could delay the diagnosis of advanced PCa. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER) was used to identify men (age 55-69) diagnosed with PCa between 2004-2015. PCa stage was categorized as nodal (N1M0) and metastatic (NxM1). Trend analysis was stratified based on year 2004-2008 (group 1), 2009-2012 (group 2), and 2012-2015 (group 3). Using group 2 as a reference, multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors for N1M0 and NxM1 in each group. Results: From 2004-2015, there were 603,323 eligible men diagnosed with PCa (group 1: 262,240 men, group 2: 210,045 men, group 3: 131,038 men). In group 1, 1.4% had N1M0 and 2.8% had NxM1. In group 2, 1.6% had N1M0 and 3.7% had NxM1. In group 3, 1.4% had N1M0, and 6.1% had NxM1. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of N1M0 was 0.78 (95%CI 0.74-0.82; p<0.0001) in group 1 and 1.71 (95%CI 1.63-1.80; p<0.0001) in group 3. Similar AOR trends were seen in NxM1 (group 1, 0.71; 95%CI 0.68-0.73, p< 0.0001 vs. group 3, 1.70; 95% CI 1.63-1.75, p<0.0001). (Table) Subset analysis of non-eligible patients (age >70 and <55) showed a similar stage migration. Conclusions: With each USPSTF recommendation, there have been significantly more diagnoses of advanced PCa; suggesting stage migration. The sequelae of having advanced PCa include more aggressive treatments, increased financial burden, and reduced quality of life. Future population studies are warranted to investigate whether the updated 2018 USPSTF recommendation now encapsulates the best target population.[Table: see text]

Impact of USPSTF recommendations on utilization of PSA screening in Medicare beneficiaries.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 166-166
Author(s):  
Rahul Ramesh Khairnar ◽  
Mark Mishra ◽  
Ebere Onukwugha
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The United States ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
Medicare Population ◽  
The Impact

166 Background: Previous studies assessing the impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on utilization of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening have not investigated longer-term impacts of the 2008 recommendations nor have they investigated the impact of the 2012 recommendations in the Medicare population. The study aim was to evaluate change in utilization of PSA screening, post USPSTF recommendations of 2008 and 2012, and to assess trends and determinants of receipt of PSA screening in the Medicare population. Methods: This retrospective study of male Medicare beneficiaries utilized Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) data and linked administrative claims from 2006-2013. Beneficiaries aged ≥65 years, with continuous enrollment in Parts A and B for each year they were surveyed were included in the study cohort. Beneficiaries with self-reported or claims-based diagnosis of prostate cancer were excluded. Beneficiaries with Medicare eligibility due to end stage renal disease or disability were also excluded. The primary outcome was receipt of PSA screening. Other measures include age groups (65-74 and ≥75), time periods (pre- and post-2008 and 2012 recommendations), and sociodemographic variables. Results: The study cohort consisted of 11,028 beneficiaries, who were predominantly white (87.56%), married (69.25%), and unemployed (84.4%); 52.21% beneficiaries were aged ≥75. Declining utilization trends for PSA screening were observed only in men aged ≥75 after 2008 recommendations and in both age groups after 2012 recommendations. The odds of receiving PSA screening declined by 17% percent in men aged ≥75 after the 2008 recommendations and by 29% in men aged ≥65 after the 2012 recommendations. Conclusions: The USPSTF recommendations of 2008 and 2012 against PSA screening were associated with declines in utilization of PSA screening during the study period. USPSTF recommendations play a significant role in affecting utilization patterns of health services. Future studies should evaluate if the proposed 2017 update to these recommendations advocating shared decision-making for PSA screening in men aged 55-69 increase utilization in this age-group.

scholarly journals Prostate cancer screening among family physicians in Ontario: An update on attitudes and current practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. E53-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Paul Akerman ◽  
Christopher B. Allard ◽  
Camilla Tajzler ◽  
Anil Kapoor
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Preventive Health Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Screening Practices ◽  
Psa Screening

Introduction: This study serves as an update of prostate cancer screening practices among family physicians in Ontario, Canada. Since this population was first surveyed in 2010, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) and the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released recommendations against prostate cancer screening.Methods: An online survey was developed through input from urologists and family practitioners. It was distributed via email to all members of the Ontario Medical Association’s Section on General and Family practice (11 657 family physicians). A reminder email was sent at two weeks and the survey remained active for one month.Results: A total of 1880 family physicians completed surveys (response rate 16.1%). Overall, 80.4% offered prostate cancer screening compared to 91.7% when surveyed in 2010. Physicians new to practice (two years or less) were the most likely to not offer screening (24.6%). A combination of digital rectal exam (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remained the most common form of screening (58.3%). Following the release of the CTFPHC recommendations, 45.6% of respondents said they now screen fewer patients. Participants were less familiar with national urological society guidelines compared to task force recommendations. The majority (72.6%) of respondents feel PSA screening leads to overdiagnosis and treatment. Those surveyed remained split with respect to PSA utility.Conclusions: Data suggest a decline in screening practices since 2010, with newer graduates less likely to offer screening. CFTPHC and USPSTF recommendations had the greatest impact on clinical practice. Those surveyed were divided with respect to PSA utility. Some additional considerations to PSA screening in the primary care setting, including patient-driven factors, were not captured by our concise survey.

scholarly journals Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening According to Health Professional Counseling and Age in the United States

2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ray M. Merrill ◽  
Seth A. Otto ◽  
Eliza B. Hammond
Keyword(s):  
Health Professional ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Professional Counseling ◽  
Psa Test ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Us

Background. In 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended that PSA screening for prostate cancer involve men aged 55–69, based on a personal decision following consultation with a health professional. PSA screening in men aged 70 or older should only occur if symptoms exist. This study identifies the association between having a PSA test in the past two years and whether or not there was consultation with a health professional about the benefits and/or harms of PSA screening. Methods. Analyses were based on data involving men aged 40 years or older, who responded to PSA related questions in the 2018 BRFSS survey. Results. Approximately 32.0% (14.6% for ages 40–54, 41.7% for ages 55–69, and 49.8% for ages 70 years and older) of respondents had a PSA test in the past two years. Approximately 81.7% of these men had talked with a health professional about the benefits and/or harms of PSA screening, with 42.4% having discussed the benefits and harms, 54.6% having discussed the benefits only, and 3.0% having discussed the harms only. The odds of a PSA test in the past two years in men having talked with a health professional about the benefits and harms of the test versus no talk are 10.1 (95% CI 9.3–10.8), in men who talked with a health professional about the benefits only versus no talk are 10.8 (95% CI 10.0–11.6), and in men who talked with a health professional about the harms only versus no talk are 3.9 (95% CI 2.9–5.1). Conclusion. PSA screening is most common in men aged 70 or older, which is counter to the US Preventive Task Force recommendation. Most men having a PSA test have talked with a health professional about the test, but the talks tended to focus on just the benefits of screening and not both potential benefits and harms.

Medical Malpractice Implications of PSA Testing for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary McNaughton Collins ◽  
Floyd J. Fowler ◽  
Richard G. Roberts ◽  
Joseph E. Oesterling ◽  
George J. Annas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Cancer Society ◽  
Major Health ◽  
Psa Testing ◽  
American Urological Association

Prostate cancer has become a major health concern of male Americans. It is now the most common nondermatologic cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men. The incidence of detected prostate cancer rose rapidly in recent years, partly because of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing; it is only now tapering off. Screening for prostate cancer with PSA is widespread in the United States, yet controversial: the American Urological Association recommends PSA screening and the American Cancer Society recommends offering screening; however, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and the American College of Physicians (ACP) recommend against routine screening; and the American Academy of Family Physicians believes that the decision to screen should be left to the patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document