Access-Site Complications of the Transfemoral Approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
Stephanie H. Chen ◽  
Pascal M. Jabbour ◽  
Eric C. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Access Route ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Hematoma Formation ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Femoral Approach ◽  
Life Threatening

The radial access route has significantly lower complications compared to the femoral access route. Often users have become used to the femoral approach and its attendant complications but it is worth reviewing that despite its minimally invasive nature as opposed to open craniotomy, endovascular transfemoral access is certainly not without risk. These risks include life threatening retroperiotenal hematoma formation and local hematoma formation as well as limb threatening occlusion of the femoral artery, which is an end artery thus must be urgently revascularlized in the event of compromise. The complications of femoral access are reviewed as well as strategies for management.

scholarly journals Access-Site Complications in Transfemoral Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Systematic Review of Incidence Rates and Management Strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazen Oneissi ◽  
Ahmad Sweid ◽  
Stavropoula Tjoumakaris ◽  
David Hasan ◽  
M Reid Gooch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Neurointerventional Procedures

Abstract BACKGROUND The femoral artery is the most common access route for cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures. Complications of the transfemoral approach include groin hemorrhages and hematomas, retroperitoneal hematomas, pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, peripheral artery occlusions, femoral nerve injuries, and access-site infections. Incidence rates vary among different randomized and nonrandomized trials, and the literature lacks a comprehensive review of this subject. OBJECTIVE To gather data from 16 randomized clinical trials (RCT) and 17 nonrandomized cohort studies regarding femoral access-site complications for a review paper. We also briefly discuss management strategies for these complications based on the most recent literature. METHODS A PubMed indexed search for all neuroendovascular clinical trials, retrospective studies, and prospective studies that reported femoral artery access-site complications in neurointerventional procedures. RESULTS The overall access-site complication rate in RCTs is 5.13%, while in in non-RCTs, the rate is 2.78%. The most common complication in both groups is groin hematoma followed by access-site hemorrhage and femoral pseudoaneurysm. On the other hand, wound infection was the least common complication. CONCLUSION The transfemoral approach in neuroendovascular procedures holds risk for several complications. This review will allow further studies to compare access-site complications between the transfemoral approach and other alternative access sites, mainly the transradial approach, which is gaining a lot of interest nowadays.

scholarly journals Cardiogenic shock and radial access in patients with an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Zahn ◽  
M Hochadel ◽  
B Schumacher ◽  
M Pauschinger ◽  
C Stellbrink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Strong Variation ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) in patients (pts) with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the strongest predictor of hospital mortality. Radial in contrast to femoral access in STEMI pts might be associated with a lower mortality. However, little is known on radial access in CS pts. Methods We retrospectively analysed all STEMI pts between 2009 and 2015 who sufferend from CS and who were included into the ALKK PCI registry. Pts treated via a radial access were compared to those treated via a femoral access. Results Between 2009 and 2015 23796 STEMI pts were included in the registry. 1763 (7.4%) of pts were in CS. The proportion of radial access was 6.6%: in 2009 4.0% and in 2015 19.6%, p for trend <0.0001 with a strong variation between the participating centres (0% to 37%). Conclusions Radial access was only used in 6.6% of STEMI pts presenting in CS. However, a significant increase in the use of radial access was observed over time (2009: 4%, 2015 19.6%, p<0.001), with a great variance in its use between the participating hospitals. Despite similar pt characteristics the difference in hospital mortality according to access site has to be interpretated with caution. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

TRIACCESS Study: Randomized Comparison Between Radial, Femoral, and Pedal Access for Percutaneous Femoro-popliteal Artery Angioplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110385
Author(s):  
Zoltán Ruzsa ◽  
Ádám Csavajda ◽  
István Hizoh ◽  
Mónika Deák ◽  
Péter Sótonyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Access Site Complication

Background The aim of this randomized study was to compare the success and complication rates of different access sites for the treatment of superficial artery stenosis. Methods and Results A total of 180 consecutive patients were randomized in a prospective study to treat symptomatic superficial femoral artery stenosis via radial (RA), femoral (FA), or pedal artery (PA) access. Technical success was achieved in 96.7%, 100%, and 100% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.33). Secondary access sites were used in 30%, 3.3%, and 30% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA access groups, respectively (p=0.0002). Recanalization for chronic total occlusion was performed in 34/36 (94.4%), 30/30 (100%), and 46/46 (100%) patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.17). The X-ray dose was significantly lower in the PA group than that in the RA and FA access groups (63.1 vs 162 vs 153 Dyn, p=0.0004). The cumulative rates of access site complications in the RA, FA, and PA groups were 3.3% (0% major and 3.3% minor), 16.7% (3.3% major and 13.3% minor), and 3.3% (3.3% major and 0% minor) (p=0.0085), respectively. The cumulative incidence of MACEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 5%, 6.7%, and 1.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of MALEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 20%, 16.7%, and 9.2%, respectively (p=0.54). Conclusion Femoral artery intervention can be safely and effectively performed using radial, femoral, and pedal access, but radial and pedal access is associated with a lower access site complication rate and hospitalization. Pedal access is associated with a lower X-ray dose than that with radial and femoral access.

Outcome off Primary Coronary Angioplasty by Radial Route: Study on 100 Cases

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Dilip Ratnani ◽  
Dr. Rekha Ratnani
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Artery Cannulation ◽  
Catheterization Laboratory ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Coronary Procedures

Recently radial artery is being used as a vascular access route for coronary procedures. Primary angioplasty with transfemoral procedure is associated with high access site bleeding complications due to use of potent antiplatelets and anticoagulants therefore radial access should be preferred if the operators are experienced and familiar with the technique. Methods: Total 100 pa‡…tients were included in the study in which procedure was performed by the trans radial route. All routine laboratory investigations were performed. Support of a temporary pacemaker was kept ready. All patients were prepared according to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards. Radial artery cannulation was performed. Results: 100 patients were included in the study selected for radial route. Mean age of the patients who underwent primary CAI was 59±8.4. The most affected artery in the as shown angiography was Left anterior descending (58%) followed by Right coronary artery (41%). Least affected artery was left main (6%) and Ramus intermedius (6%). Mean of diseased vessels was 1.34 ± 1.25. Crossover from radial to femoral route was done on 5 patients of which 2 patients were having radial artery anomaly and in 3 patients arterial puncture was not successful. Mean hospital stay of the patients after procedure was 6.8 ± 2.1. Conclusion: transradial approach for coronary procedures is a safe technique and gives similar clinical results to transfemoral access. Complications at the radial access site are negligible. Length of hospital stay, time to mobilisation and cost all are reduced in the transfemoral approach.

Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Approach in Patients with St Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_D) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Torkey ◽  
Mohamed Sanhoury ◽  
Mohammad Sadaka ◽  
Amr Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Procedural Time

Abstract Aim of the work To compare transradial and transfemoral approaches in 1ry and rescue PCI for STEMI. Methods This prospective observational study was done at Alexandria University Hospital and International Cardiac Center from January 2020 to August 2020 by recruiting every patient had met our inclusion criteria (the third universal definition of MI) admitted to the coronary care unit after doing primary or rescue PCI 200 patients were involved. Exclusion criteria were (Thrombophilia and thrombocytopenia, known hematological abnormalities, and patients with known sever peripheral vascular disease. Randomization made by a computer-generated program into two equal parallel groups that were randomly assigned to either Radial access approach or femoral access approach for primary or rescue PCI. Chest pain to time of first medical contact (FMC), and the procedural time were computed. Coronary angiography and PCI procedure were described including materials used and the intra-procedure complications. MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) or other hemodynamic complications were documented. All the patients were contacted for follow up to 6 months after the procedure by interviewing with the patients via telephone or the responsible physician to determine the outcomes procedure. Results The distribution of demographic variables and risk factors were similar among 200 patients in the radial and femoral groups. There had been significant differences between the groups concerning the primary end point MACE after 6 months in favor of radial group patients with p value (0.004), there was significant deference between the two studied groups concerning the total bleeding complication with higher risk in femoral group 11% compared to radial group 3% with P value (0.02). Despite the nearly equal mean time from pain to FMC (9.01 hours in radial group and 9.2 hours in femoral group), the total procedural time was significantly longer in radial group compared to femoral group with (p value 0.037). However the rate of non-culprit vessel revascularsation was significantly higher in radial group 17% compared to 6% in femoral group with p value of (0.015). In-hospital stay was significantly shorter in the radial group patients P value (0.02). Conclusion Transradial approach is safe, and effective with a high procedural success rate as the transfemoral approach but with lower risk for bleeding vascular complications and other access site complications as hematoma especially for patients where aggressive antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy is needed, or patients who are expected to suffer from access site complications as those who need rescue PCI. Transradial approach has major additional advantages of decreasing the incidence of MACE compared to transfemoral approach. Transradial approach has another advantages of decreasing the in hospital stay.

TRIACCESS study: randomized comparison between radial, femoral and transpedal access for for percutanous supertfitial femoral artery angioplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Ruzsa ◽  
A Csavajda ◽  
M Deak ◽  
P Sotonyi ◽  
O.F Bertrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Access Site Complication

Abstract Background Traditional access for the treatment of femoral artery lesions is the femoral artery (FA) approach, but radial (RA) and pedal access (PA) is an alternative access site. The aim of the study was to compare the success rate, complication rate of different access sites for the treatment of superfitial artery stenosis in a randomized study Methods 180 consecutive patients were randomized in a prospective study to treat symptomatic superficial femoral stenosis, via RA, FA and PA. Primary endpoint: technical success, rate of major and minor access site complications. Secondary endpoints: major adverse events (MAE), procedural factors, cross-over rate, and duration of hospitalization. Results Technical success was achieved in 96.6%, 100% and 100% patients in RA, FA and PA group (p=ns). Secondary access site was used in 30%, 3.3% and 30% in the RA, FA and PA access group (p<0.01). Stent implantation was done in the femoral artery in 26.6%, 58.3% and 71.6% cases in RA, FA and PA group (p<0.01). CTO recanalization was performed in 34/36 (100%), 30/30 (100%) and 45/45 (100%) cases successfully in RA, FA and PA group (p=ns). Contrast consumption, fluoroscopy and procedure time was not statistically different, but the X Ray dose was significantly lower in PA than in the RA and FA access group (63.1 vs 162 vs 153 Dyn). The cumulative rate of access site complications in the RA, FA and PA group was 3.3% (0% major and 3.3% minor), 15% (3.3% major and 11.6% minor) and 3.3% (0% major and 3.3% minor) (p<0.01), respectively. The cumulative incidence of MAE's at 6 months in the RA, FA and PA group was 8.3% vs 13.3% and 18.3%. (p<0.05) Conclusion Femoral artery intervention can be safely and effectively performed using radial, femoral and pedal access, but radial and pedal access is associated with less access site complication rate. Pedal access is associated with less X Ray dose than radial and femoral access. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Procedural success with radial access for carotid artery stenting: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanaporn Jaroenngarmsamer ◽  
Kartik Dev Bhatia ◽  
Hans Kortman ◽  
Emanuele Orru ◽  
Timo Krings
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Procedural Success

BackgroundFemoral access is the traditional approach for endovascular carotid artery stenting. Radial access is increasingly used as an alternative approach due to its known anatomical advantages in patients with unfavorable aortic arch morphology via the femoral approach and its excellent access site safety profile. Our objective was to analyze procedural success using radial access for carotid artery stenting as reported in the literature.MethodsThree online databases were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines for studies (n ≥20) using radial artery access for carotid artery stenting (1999–2018). Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the procedural success (successful stent placement with no requirement for crossover to femoral access), mortality, and complication rates associated with radial access.ResultsSeven eligible studies reported procedural success outcomes with a pooled meta-analysis rate of 90.8% (657/723; 95% CI 86.7% to 94.2%; I2=53.1%). Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion occurred in 5.9% (95% CI 4.1% to 8.0%; I2=0%) and forearm hematoma in 1.4% (95% CI 0.4% to 2.9%; I2=0%). Risk of minor stroke/transient ischemic attack was 1.9% (95% CI 0.6% to 3.8%; I2=42.3%) and major stroke was 1.0% (95% CI 0.4% to 1.8%; I2=0%). There were three deaths across the seven studies (0.6%; 95% CI 0.2% to 1.3%; I2=0%). The meta-analysis was limited by statistically significant heterogeneity for the primary outcome of procedural success.ConclusionRadial access for carotid artery stenting has a high procedural success rate with low rates of mortality, access site complications, and cerebrovascular complications. The potential benefits of this approach in patients with unfavorable aortic arch access should be explored in a prospective randomized trial.

scholarly journals Radial Access for Neurovascular Procedures

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (02) ◽  
pp. 182-191
Author(s):  
Sudhakar R. Satti ◽  
Ansar Z. Vance
Keyword(s):  
Access Route ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Physician Bias ◽  
Cardiovascular Interventions

AbstractRadial access is increasingly being considered in neurovascular procedures after becoming the standard access route in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. Current barriers include a lack of dedicated equipment for radial to neurovascular target vessels, lack of training for physicians and fellows, and physician bias toward femoral access secondary to greater experience and familiarity. Radial access has been proven to be safer and the preferred access route by most patients. These two factors make radial access inevitability when the aforementioned barriers are overcome. The purpose of this brief article is to highlight some important considerations of radial access specific to the neurovasculature.

scholarly journals Endovascular treatment for acute basilar thrombosis via a transradial approach: Initial experience and future considerations

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Oselkin ◽  
SR Satti ◽  
SH Sundararajan ◽  
D Kung ◽  
RW Hurst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Basilar Thrombosis

Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) secondary to emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) has an extremely poor natural history, with a reported mortality rate up to 95%. Mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of ELVO is generally performed via a transfemoral approach. However, radial access is increasingly being utilized as an alternative. We report our initial multi-institutional experience using primary radial access in the treatment of acute BAO in nine consecutive cases. Technical success defined as a TICI score of 2B or 3 was achieved in 89% of cases. Average puncture to revascularization time was 35.8 minutes. There were no complications related to radial artery catheterization. We contend radial access should potentially be considered as the first-line approach given inherent advantages over femoral access for mechanical thrombectomy for BAO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document