Adjuvant therapy for head and neck cancers

2021 ◽  
pp. 977-982
Author(s):  
Charles Kelly

The non-surgical management of head and neck cancer has changed over the last two decades with more emphasis given now to organ preservation and post-treatment organ function. These two concepts do not necessarily go hand in hand but preserving an organ without preserving its function is pointless. In this period, for some head and neck cancers subsites, for example, oropharynx, the treatment model has moved away from primary surgery followed by planned, adjuvant radiotherapy, to one of primary chemoradiotherapy with the objective of greater organ and function preservation. This change in management strategy may be coming under further review now, with the introduction of transoral robotic surgery (TORS), where the treatment model may revert back to primary surgery with the question raised, whether highly selective TORS followed by highly selective adjuvant radiotherapy using the newer radiation technologies and techniques with intensity-modulated radiotherapy or tomotherapy, with or without chemotherapy might optimize tumour control with minimal long-term morbidity.

Author(s):  
Vinod Pandey ◽  
K. C. Pandey ◽  
N. K. Pant ◽  
L. P. Verma

Abstract Introduction External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for head and neck (H&N) cancers continues to be delivered using varied technologies, ranging from the old two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2DRT) techniques to the modern three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in different centers in India. Due to limitations of spinal cord tolerance, electron and photon beams are combined in 2DRT and 3DCRT techniques for treating nodal volume of the H&N cases. However, many centers having modern technology practice IMRT/VMAT in place of electron beams. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of combined electron and photon beams in radiotherapy of H&N cancers and its relevance in the modern era of IMRT/VMAT. Materials and Methods Data were collected through a survey conducted on cancer centers in India where radiotherapy is being given by 2DRT, 3DCRT, and IMR/VMAT for the treatment of head and neck cancers. Results The mean percentage of H&N (H&N) cases among all cases were 39.2% (standard deviation [SD]: 14.22), out of which 16.63% (SD: 20.83) were treated with a combination of photon and electron beams and 49.73% (SD: 37.41) were treated with IMRT/VMAT. The average percentage of H&N cases of government institutes was 38.39% (SD: 14.11) and that of private institutes was 40.14% (SD: 14.11). Patients treated with photon and electron combination and IMRT/VMAT were 22.19% (SD: 11.24) and 24.05% (SD: 23.99), respectively, in government institutes, and 10.29% (SD: 11.24) and 79.09% (SD: 26.75) in private institutes. Conclusion As per this study, we conclude that despite the availability of IMRT/VMAT, a combination of electron and photon beams is still relevant in India. Since a large proportion of the patients are still treated with the electron and photon combination, it is imperative that further studies on field–junction dosimetry should be conducted to ensure accurate dose delivery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bednarek ◽  
T.V.F. Nguyen ◽  
M. Puyraveau ◽  
É. Bonnet ◽  
N. Lescut ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-303
Author(s):  
Farbood Kalantari ◽  
Shahin Rajaeih ◽  
Ali Daneshvar ◽  
Zahra Karbasi ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Salem

Head and neck cancers are the most common cancers in the body. Treatments are determined on the basis of the location and stage of the primary tumor. The goal of treatment is to eliminate the tumor, prevent recurrence or metastasis, and maintain the quality of life. There are several treatments available for the management of head and neck cancers, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, new molecular agents, and a combination of them. Transoral robotic technique is a short-time operation using a type of robotic machine in which the patient undergoes anesthesia for a shorter time and the side effects of this operation and the time of hospitalization are less than open surgery. Due to the importance of speed and accuracy in head and neck cancer surgery and the importance of application of robotics in surgery, the present study was designed and implemented to review the application of robotics in the management of head and neck cancers. In this review study, the keywords: application, robotic, surgical, head cancer, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and neck cancer, were searched in ISI, PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar databases. Related articles written domestically or abroad that have covered areas such as the background of transoral robotic surgery, maintaining organ function and approaches, the advantages and disadvantages of TORS, the affordability of TORS, the combination of TORS with other therapeutic approaches published from 2003 to 2019 were reviewed. The use of robotic surgery for precise operations such as head and neck cancers seems to be essential. More advanced robotic devices are expected to expand the surgery treatment for head and neck cancers as well as the results of using TORS for oncologic optimization and acceptability of results while maintaining organ function and patient's quality of life.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Süß ◽  
Anna Ratzisberger ◽  
Matthias Hipp ◽  
Tobias Ettl ◽  
Julian Kuenzel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background:Radiotherapy and chemoradiation are well-established therapies for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In aging societies, also the incidence of SCCHN in elderly patients is rising. Because of the underrepresentation of elderly patients in scientific trials, we evaluated the feasibility of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiation in patients with SCCHN aged >70 years. Methods:All patients had been >70 years at the time of diagnosis and received adjuvant radiotherapy or, if feasible, chemoradiation at the University Medical Centre Regensburg between 2004 and 2018.71 patients -most with SCCHN UICC stage IVa- with a median age of 75 years were included; 9 patients received concomitant chemoradiation. Median follow-up was 27 months (IQR 18 – 62 months).Results:Radiotherapy and chemoradiation was well tolerated. 62 patients (87.3%) underwent treatment without interruption, and 65 patients (91.5%) completed radiotherapy with 95% of the initially prescribed dose. Median dose for all patients was 64 Gy (IQR: 60 – 66 Gy). 6/9 patients received at least 75 % of the planned chemotherapy dose. 37 patients (52.1%) developed acute toxicity CTC grade III or IV.Overall survival was 87 % after 12 months, 67 % after 24 months and 41 % after 60 months. Median overall survival was 51 months (IQR: 19 - 99 months). Local tumour control was 99 % after 12 months, 88 % after 24 months and 76 % after 5 years.Conclusion:Feasibility of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiation in our collective of elderly patients with SCCHN was good. Particularly local tumour control was satisfactory. Overall survival does not seem to differ between elderly and younger patients or patients unselected for age. De-intensification of treatment because of age does not seem justified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document