Session 24: Looking Ahead

2016 ◽  
pp. 145-154
Author(s):  
Evan M. Forman ◽  
Meghan L. Butryn

This chapter presents Session 24, which focuses on the upcoming end of treatment and clients’ anticipated challenges after treatment ends, as well as long-term goals to continue with weight control behaviors. Key behavioral (e.g., self-monitoring, limiting calorie intake) and psychological (e.g., defusion, willingness) strategies are presented to promote long-term weight control.

2016 ◽  
pp. 205-216
Author(s):  
Evan M. Forman ◽  
Meghan L. Butryn

This chapter presents Session 24, which focuses on the upcoming end of treatment and clients’ anticipated challenges after treatment ends, as well as long-term goals to continue with weight control behaviors. Key behavioral (e.g., self-monitoring, limiting calorie intake) and psychological (e.g., defusion, willingness) strategies are presented to promote long-term weight control.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1006-1014
Author(s):  
Michael P Berry ◽  
Elisabeth M Seburg ◽  
Meghan L Butryn ◽  
Robert W Jeffery ◽  
Melissa M Crane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Individuals receiving behavioral weight loss treatment frequently fail to adhere to prescribed dietary and self-monitoring instructions, resulting in weight loss clinicians often needing to assess and intervene in these important weight control behaviors. A significant obstacle to improving adherence is that clinicians and clients sometimes disagree on the degree to which clients are actually adherent. However, prior research has not examined how clinicians and clients differ in their perceptions of client adherence to weight control behaviors, nor the implications for treatment outcomes. Purpose In the context of a 6-month weight-loss treatment, we examined differences between participants and clinicians when rating adherence to weight control behaviors (dietary self-monitoring; limiting calorie intake) and evaluated the hypothesis that rating one’s own adherence more highly than one’s clinician would predict less weight loss during treatment. Methods Using clinician and participant-reported measures of self-monitoring and calorie intake adherence, each assessed using a single item with a 7- or 8-point scale, we characterized discrepancies between participant and clinician adherence and examined associations with percent weight change over 6 months using linear mixed-effects models. Results Results indicated that ratings of adherence were higher when reported by participants and supported the hypothesis that participants who provided higher adherence ratings relative to their clinicians lost less weight during treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions These findings suggest that participants in weight loss treatment frequently appraise their own adherence more highly than their clinicians and that participants who do so to a greater degree tend to lose less weight.


2016 ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
Evan M. Forman ◽  
Meghan L. Butryn

This chapter (Session 23) discusses how to maintain long-term motivation for weight control by focusing on the importance of values to motivate behavior, even if short-term reward of weight control behaviors is decreasing (e.g., weight loss is slowing, self-monitoring is becoming tiresome). Clients are encouraged to view the hard work of weight control as working toward their values and to use the skill of willingness to continue to engage in healthy behaviors, even when it is difficult uncomfortable to do so.


2016 ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Evan M. Forman ◽  
Meghan L. Butryn

This chapter (Session 23) discusses how to maintain long-term motivation for weight control by focusing on the importance of values to motivate behavior, even if short-term reward of weight control behaviors is decreasing (e.g., weight loss is slowing, self-monitoring is becoming tiresome). Clients are encouraged to view the hard work of weight control as working toward their values and to use the skill of willingness to continue to engage in healthy behaviors, even when it is difficult uncomfortable to do so.


2007 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-241
Author(s):  
Simone Munsch ◽  
Andrea H. Meyer ◽  
Jürgen Margraf

In this study, we aimed to describe the effectiveness of a short-term telephone-counseling program in combination with orlistat in overweight and obese outpatients and to test the influence of pre-treatment characteristics on weight-loss goals and achieved weight change. A total of 655 patients were contacted every 6 weeks, receiving an average of 5.2 telephone calls. Patients lost on average 7.7% of their initial weight during treatment. Reported weight-loss goals amounted to 17.8% of initial weight. Desired weight loss was positively related to weight at program start and age. Achieved weight loss was positively related to weight at program start, but not to sex and age. Low-intensity telephone treatment in combination with orlistat induced weight loss in an outpatient sample. At the end of treatment, patients judged lower-than-desired weight loss as satisfactory. Setting high weight-loss goals was a positive predictor of weight loss. However, long-term maintenance remains unclear.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Phelan ◽  
Sapna Peruvemba ◽  
David Levinson ◽  
Noah Stulberg ◽  
Aidan Lacy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Behavioral weight loss interventions promote clinically significant weight loss over 12 months, but weight regain remains problematic and a substantial proportion of participants do not achieve long-term weight loss maintenance. Novel methods are needed that instill habit strength for sustaining weight control behaviors long term. Virtual reality (VR) has the potential to provide opportunities within behavioral treatment for patients to practice desired weight control behaviors in the frequency and magnitude necessary to build durable habits. A pilot randomized trial was done to test the feasibility integrating virtual reality (VR) into standard behavioral weight loss treatment. Methods Participants were 15 adults (43 years; 46.7% Hispanic), with overweight or obesity who were randomly assigned to a 4-week Standard Behavioral Weight Loss plus Non-Weight-Related VR app (i.e., Control Group) or Standard Behavioral Weight Loss plus Weight-Related VR app (i.e., Intervention Group). The Intervention’s VR tool was designed to enable practice of behavioral skills taught in weekly group meetings, including managing social and home environmental cues for eating and activity. Results Participants were recruited over 3 months, and retention at the final assessment visit was high (86.6%). The VR footage and resulting app were rated as highly realistic (6.7 on a 10-point scale), and the VR program overall was rated as highly satisfactory (3.6 on a 4-point scale). Adverse effects of eye strain and motion sickness were minimal (~ 2 on a 7-point scale). As expected, the intervention and control groups both lost weight and unadjusted means (SD) averaged 3.4% (2.7) and 2.3% (3.6), respectively, over the 4 weeks. Overall, participants reported preferring a VR approach above traditional weight loss programs (rating of 5 on a 7-point scale). Conclusions Future research is needed to develop and test the feasibility of using VR for other weight control skills with a larger sample size and longer evaluation period to determine if VR can improve standard behavioral weight loss outcomes by intensifying practice opportunities and building habit strength for weight loss maintenance. Trial registration NCT04534088; date of registration: 09/01/2020, retrospectively registered.


2016 ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
Evan M. Forman ◽  
Meghan L. Butryn

This chapter (Session 17) provides strategies on how to maintain weight losses over the long term, including continuing to eat a low-calorie, low-fat diet, eating regular meals, and engaging in regular physical activity. Clients are encouraged to consider how the psychological strategies they have learned thus far can assist them in maintaining weight control behaviors in the long term.


2016 ◽  
pp. 143-152
Author(s):  
Evan M. Forman ◽  
Meghan L. Butryn

This chapter (Session 17) provides strategies on how to maintain weight losses over the long term, including continuing to eat a low-calorie, low-fat diet, eating regular meals, and engaging in regular physical activity. Clients are encouraged to consider how the psychological strategies they have learned thus far can assist them in maintaining weight control behaviors in the long term.


2020 ◽  
pp. 187-216
Author(s):  
Eugene H. Cordes

Obesity is a major and growing threat to good health to most parts of the world. In the United States, Xenical, marketed over the counter as Alli, is the only drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for long-term use for weight control. There are several others—Qsymia, Contrave, Belviq, Saxenda—that are approved for short-term use. A number of others, approved earlier, have been withdrawn from the market for patient safety reasons, including the popular combination known as phen-fen. The pharmaceutical industry has found the discovery of effective and safe weight control drugs to be a formidable challenge. Xenical (tetrahydrolipstatin) is an inhibitor of an enzyme in the gut that promotes the digestion of fats. As a result, an increased fraction of ingested fat is excreted in the feces rather than being absorbed in the body, a reduction in effective calorie intake. This is a novel weight control mechanism of action. Other agents act to suppress appetite or as stimulants to calorie burning. Dietary measures to control weight take several forms, but the effective measure is calorie intake, not diet composition. The field of weight control is rife with false and unsubstantiated claims of efficacy. Research to find better drugs for weight control continues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document