scholarly journals A Global Health Engagement Success: Applying Evidence-Based Concepts to Create a Rapid Response Team in Angola to Combat Ebola and Other Public Health Emergencies of International Concern

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 113-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D Owens ◽  
Jason Rice ◽  
David Moore ◽  
Adrien L Adams
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S-8-S-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley L. Greiner ◽  
Tasha Stehling-Ariza ◽  
Dante Bugli ◽  
Adela Hoffman ◽  
Coralie Giese ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Lynn Gallagher-Ford ◽  
Ellen Fineout-Overholt ◽  
Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk ◽  
Susan B. Stillwell

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Bruckel

The implementation of Rapid Response Teams is becoming commonplace in U.S. hospitals, following the model developed in Australia. The Rapid Response Team is a method of bringing ICU-level patient care to the bedside of critically ill patients using a multidisciplinary team. Acute care unit staff are trained to recognize clinical deterioration using a set of vital sign calling criteria (systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg, pulse below 60 or above 100, etc.). Many hospitals have been facing problems gaining needed support to make the organizational changes needed for the team to function properly. Some faculty physicians have expressed apprehension about losing control over their patients, and they have also highlighted the lack of rigorous experimental evidence that the teams work. Since there are so many confounding factors at work when trying to design an experimental study of this type of change, the study may not accurately portray the situation. Other evaluation methods should therefore be considered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205435812093856
Author(s):  
Rita S. Suri ◽  
John E. Antonsen ◽  
Cheryl A. Banks ◽  
David A. Clark ◽  
Sara N. Davison ◽  
...  

Purpose: To collate best practice recommendations on the management of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on published reports and current public health advice, while considering ethical principles and the unique circumstances of Canadian hemodialysis units across the country. Sources of information: The workgroup members used Internet search engines to retrieve documents from provincial and local hemodialysis programs; provincial public health agencies; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; webinars and slides from other kidney agencies; and nonreviewed preprints. PubMed was used to search for peer-reviewed published articles. Informal input was sought from knowledge users during a webinar. Methods: Challenges in the care of hemodialysis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were highlighted within the Canadian Senior Renal Leaders Forum discussion group. The Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) developed the COVID-19 rapid response team (RRT) to address these challenges. They identified a pan-Canadian team of clinicians and administrators with expertise in hemodialysis to form the workgroup. One lead was chosen who drafted the initial document. Members of the workgroup reviewed and discussed all recommendations in detail during 2 virtual meetings on April 7 and April 9. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The document was reviewed by the CSN COVID-19 RRT, an ethicist, an infection control expert, a community nephrologist, and a patient partner. Content was presented during an interactive webinar on April 11, 2020 attended by 269 kidney health professionals, and the webinar and first draft of the document were posted online. Final revisions were made based on feedback received until April 13, 2020. CJKHD editors reviewed the parallel process peer review and edited the manuscript for clarity. Key findings: Recommendations were made under the following themes: (1) Identification of patients with COVID-19 in the dialysis unit, (2) hemodialysis of patients with confirmed COVID-19, (3) hemodialysis of patients not yet known to have COVID-19, (4) visitors; (5) testing for COVID-19 in the dialysis unit; (6) resuscitation, (6) routine hemodialysis care, (7) hemodialysis care under fixed dialysis resources. Limitations: Because of limitations of time and resources, and the large number of questions, formal systematic review was not undertaken. The recommendations are based on expert opinion and subject to bias. The parallel review process that was created may not be as robust as the standard peer review process. Implications: We hope that these recommendations provide guidance for dialysis unit directors, clinicians, and administrators on how to limit risk from infection and adverse outcomes, while providing necessary dialysis care in a setting of finite resources. We also identify a number of resource allocation priorities, which we hope will inform decisions at provincial funding agencies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasha Stehling-Ariza ◽  
Adrienne Lefevre ◽  
Dinorah Calles ◽  
Kpandja Djawe ◽  
Richard Garfield ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Boris Jung ◽  
Gerald Chanques ◽  
Samir Jaber ◽  
Kada Klouche

La mise en place d’une Rapid Response Team a pour objectif la mise en place d’une structure de réponse hospitalièrepour la prise en charge des urgences vitales et surtout une réponse précoce à la dégradation clinique des patientshospitalisés avant que l’urgence vitale ne survienne. Nous discutons dans ce manuscrit le rationnel et le niveau depreuve motivant la mise en place d’une Rapid Response Team ainsi que les freins qui doivent être surmontés pour lesuccès de cette mise en place.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document