scholarly journals Marizomib alone or in combination with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: phase I/II clinical trial data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela A Bota ◽  
Warren Mason ◽  
Santosh Kesari ◽  
Rajiv Magge ◽  
Benjamin Winograd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Blood Brain Barrier ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Brain Barrier ◽  
Part C ◽  
Blood Brain

Abstract Background This phase I/II trial in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of marizomib, an irreversible pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood–brain barrier. Patients and Methods Part A assessed the safety and efficacy of marizomib monotherapy. In Part B, escalating doses of marizomib (0.5–0.8 mg/m2) in combination with bevacizumab were evaluated. Part C explored intra-patient dose escalation of marizomib (0.8–1.0 mg/m2) for the combination. Results In Part A, 30 patients received marizomib monotherapy. The most common AEs were fatigue (66.7%), headache (46.7%), hallucination (43.3%), and insomnia (43.3%). One patient (3.3%) achieved a partial response. In Part B, the recommended phase II dose of marizomib was 0.8 mg/m2 when combined with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. In Part C, dose escalation to 1.0 mg/m2 was not tolerated. Pooled analysis of 67 patients treated with marizomib ≤0.8 mg/m2 and bevacizumab showed a non-overlapping safety profile consistent with the known safety profile of each agent: the most common grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (16.4%), confusion (13.4%), headache (10.4%), and fatigue (10.4%). The overall response rate was 34.3%, including 2 patients with complete response. Six-month progression-free survival was 29.8%; median overall survival was 9.1 months. Conclusions The safety profile of marizomib as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab was consistent with previous observations that marizomib crosses the blood–brain barrier. Preliminary efficacy did not demonstrate a meaningful benefit of the addition of marizomib to bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent GBM.

A phase I/IIa study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening with the SonoCloud-9 implantable ultrasound device in recurrent glioblastoma patients receiving IV carboplatin.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2049-2049
Author(s):  
Ahmed Idbaih ◽  
Francois Ducray ◽  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Nathalie Baize ◽  
Olivier L. Chinot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Blood Brain Barrier ◽  
Tissue Concentration ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Brain Barrier ◽  
Pulsed Ultrasound ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Blood Brain

2049 Background: Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPU) in conjunction with intravenous microbubbles can transiently and reversibly disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB), allowing for an increase in the tissue concentration of chemotherapy agents in the brain. Mass spectrometry data from preclinical models (mouse, swine) showed a > 5x enhancement in carboplatin brain concentrations, which correlated well with the spatial distribution of a Gadolinium (Gd) contrast agent used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: The primary objective of this phase I/IIa study (NCT03744026) was to demonstrate the safety of BBB disruption using LIPU in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. This study was a 3+3 design using escalating numbers (3, 6, 9) of activated 1 MHz ultrasound emitters. Nine patients were treated in the escalation phase and another 12 patients were treated with 9 emitters in the expansion phase. Eligibility included recurrent GBM (any recurrence) with a maximum tumor size of < 70 mm. The SonoCloud-9 device (CarThera, Paris, France) was implanted during tumor debulking/resection surgery and replaced the bone flap, with the device targeting the tumor and surrounding peritumoral brain. The device was activated every four weeks for a duration of 270 seconds, concomitantly with IV DEFINITY microbubbles (10 ml/kg), to disrupt the BBB prior to administration of carboplatin (AUC 4-6). MRI was performed to verify safety and evaluate efficacy of BBB disruption with Gd enhancement. Results: No DLTs were observed. The overall tolerance of the SonoCloud-9 implant was good, with two transient, manageable grade 3 wound infections and one grade 1 acquired meningocele event considered as probably related to the overall procedure. The most frequent neurologic adverse events were grade 1 blurred vision (5%) and dizziness (5%). Conclusions: Significant Gd enhancement was observed after more than 90% of sonication sessions, suggesting effective BBB disruption and carboplatin enhancement. Clinical trial information: NCT03744026.

scholarly journals P05.05 Safety and feasibility of temporary blood-brain barrier disruption with the SonoCloud-1/3 implantable ultrasound device in recurrent glioblastoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii34-iii35 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Idbaih ◽  
M Canney ◽  
G Bouchoux ◽  
C Desseaux ◽  
A Vignot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Brain Barrier ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Brain Barrier ◽  
Gadolinium Contrast ◽  
Ultrasound Device ◽  
Blood Brain ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Limited Effectiveness

Abstract BACKGROUND The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits penetration of drug therapies to the brain and may account for the limited effectiveness of chemotherapies in patients with primary brain cancer. An implantable ultrasound (US) device, SonoCloud, was developed to temporarily disrupt the BBB in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) prior to carboplatin chemotherapy administration to enhance brain drug concentrations. BBB disruption was investigated with a single emitter device, SonoCloud-1 (SC1) and a three-emitter device, SonoCloud-3 (SC3) in a safety and feasibility study in rGBM patients at the Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière in Paris, France (NCT02253212). MATERIAL AND METHODS The SC1 implant consisted of a 1 MHz, 10-mm diameter ultrasound transducer encapsulated in a biocompatible housing while the SC3 consisted of (3) separate SC1 emitters implanted in a triangular pattern to disrupt the BBB over a 3x larger volume. Patients were implanted with the SonoCloud device during tumor debulking or in a dedicated surgical procedure. The devices were activated monthly by connecting the device to an external generator via a transdermal needle. Intravenous injection of SonoVue® microbubbles was performed with device activation to temporarily disrupt the BBB. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed after sonications with gadolinium contrast to verify BBB disruption followed by carboplatin infusion at AUC4-6. Patients received treatments until disease progression. RESULTS Between 2014 and 2016, 21 patients were registered for the study and implanted with the SC1; 19 patients received at least one sonication. Six additional patients were implanted and received sonications with the SC3. A total of 89 US sessions were performed to disrupt the BBB - 65 with the SC1 and 24 with the SC3. Treatment-related adverse events observed were transient and manageable. No carboplatin-related neurotoxicity was observed. SC1 patients with no or poor BBB disruption (n=8) visible on MRI had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.73 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.64 months. SC1 patients with clear BBB disruption (n=11) had a median PFS of 4.11 months, and a median OS of 12.94 months. The SC3 device was as well-tolerated as the SC1 device, with SC3 patients receiving between 1–12 monthly sonications. CONCLUSION These results provide the first safety data on the effects of disrupting the BBB in rGBM patients prior to carboplatin chemotherapy using an implantable low intensity pulsed ultrasound device on enlarged areas of brain. This study has now been completed. A new safety study with a larger device, SonoCloud-9, that covers the tumor and surrounding infiltrative regions, has started in France in early 2019 (NCT03744026). Work supported by CarThera and APHP.

scholarly journals ACTR-57. A PHASE 1/2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER (BBB) OPENING WITH A NINE-EMITTER IMPLANTABLE ULTRASOUND DEVICE IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS PRIOR TO CARBOPLATIN

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi26-vi27
Author(s):  
Ahmed Idbaih ◽  
François Ducray ◽  
John DeGroot ◽  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Jacques Guyotat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Brain Barrier ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Brain Barrier ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Ultrasound Device ◽  
Blood Brain

Abstract The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits penetration of systemically administered therapies to brain tumors and peritumoral tissue and may be responsible for the failure of numerous drugs in recent clinical trials for glioblastoma (GBM). Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPU), with concomitant intravenous microbubble injection (DEFINITY®), can temporarily disrupt the BBB for 6–24 hours and allow for enhanced delivery of drugs to the brain. In previous clinical studies, a 1-cm ultrasound (US) device, SonoCloud-1, was implanted in a burr hole of recurrent GBM patients (n=27) and used to disrupt the BBB prior to carboplatin infusion at AUC5. This ongoing pilot phase 1/2 study (NCT03744026) aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transient opening of the BBB by LIPU in rGBM with the SonoCloud-9, a larger nine-emitter implantable device, designed to cover the tumor and surrounding infiltrative regions. The ultrasound device is implanted in a 6 cm x 6 cm bone flap window after tumor debulking surgery. Patients receive a 270-second sonication every month with concomitant microbubble injection to disrupt the BBB followed by carboplatin infusion at AUC4-6. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed to verify safety and extent of BBB disruption. This study began enrollment in early 2019 and is an international, open-label, single arm, multi-site, dose-escalation and expansion trial to evaluate the safety of escalating sonication volume (“dose”) with concurrent carboplatin. The number of activated emitters in the implant (3, 6, 9) is increased using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Safety data of the escalation phase of the study will be presented.

scholarly journals Safety evaluation of a clinical focused ultrasound system for neuronavigation guided blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonios N. Pouliopoulos ◽  
Nancy Kwon ◽  
Greg Jensen ◽  
Anna Meaney ◽  
Yusuke Niimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Brain Barrier ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Multiple Case Study ◽  
Brain Barrier ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Blood Brain ◽  
Multiple Case ◽  
Bbb Opening

AbstractAn emerging approach with potential in improving the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumors is the use of focused ultrasound (FUS) to bypass the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in a non-invasive and localized manner. A large body of pre-clinical work has paved the way for the gradual clinical implementation of FUS-induced BBB opening. Even though the safety profile of FUS treatments in rodents has been extensively studied, the histological and behavioral effects of clinically relevant BBB opening in large animals are relatively understudied. Here, we examine the histological and behavioral safety profile following localized BBB opening in non-human primates (NHPs), using a neuronavigation-guided clinical system prototype. We show that FUS treatment triggers a short-lived immune response within the targeted region without exacerbating the touch accuracy or reaction time in visual-motor cognitive tasks. Our experiments were designed using a multiple-case-study approach, in order to maximize the acquired data and support translation of the FUS system into human studies. Four NHPs underwent a single session of FUS-mediated BBB opening in the prefrontal cortex. Two NHPs were treated bilaterally at different pressures, sacrificed on day 2 and 18 post-FUS, respectively, and their brains were histologically processed. In separate experiments, two NHPs that were earlier trained in a behavioral task were exposed to FUS unilaterally, and their performance was tracked for at least 3 weeks after BBB opening. An increased microglia density around blood vessels was detected on day 2, but was resolved by day 18. We also detected signs of enhanced immature neuron presence within areas that underwent BBB opening, compared to regions with an intact BBB, confirming previous rodent studies. Logistic regression analysis showed that the NHP cognitive performance did not deteriorate following BBB opening. These preliminary results demonstrate that neuronavigation-guided FUS with a single-element transducer is a non-invasive method capable of reversibly opening the BBB, without substantial histological or behavioral impact in an animal model closely resembling humans. Future work should confirm the observations of this multiple-case-study work across animals, species and tasks.

Phase I/II dose-escalation study of VB-111, an antiangiogenic gene therapy, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2102-TPS2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Jacob Brenner ◽  
Yael Cohen ◽  
James J Vredenburgh ◽  
Katherine B. Peters ◽  
Eyal Breitbart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

TPS2102 Background: VB-111 is an anti-angiogenic agent consisting of a non-replicating adenovirus vector (Ad-5) with a modified murine pre-proendothelin promoter leading to apoptosis of tumor vasculature by expressing a fas-chimera transgene in angiogenic endothelial cells. In a phase I/II dose-escalation study, safety and efficacy of VB-111 in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) were evaluated. Methods: VB-111 was administered as a single intravenous infusion at escalating doses from 1x1012 to 3x1012 viral particles (VPs), followed by repeat doses of 3x1012 or 1x1013every 2 months. Assessments included safety, pharmacokinetics, tumor response (RANO criteria) and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty eight patients aged 26 – 74 years at 3 medical centers in the US received up to 8 repeat doses of VB-111. The median OS was 360 [range: 70-574] and 266 days [range: 28-664] for patients receiving at least one dose of 1x1013VPs (high dose) vs. subjects who received lower doses, respectively (p NS). Progression free survival was 87 vs 55 days for patients who received high dose and for lower doses, respectively (p = 0.01). Median follow-up was 232 days. Three patients had a partial response (PR) at 82, 86 and 408 days post initial VB-111 dosing. Twenty one of the patients who progressed on VB-111 treatment received bevacizumab off study; 7 of the 15 evaluable patients (47%) had a PR compared to 30% expected according to literature. VB-111 was safe and well tolerated, 53 adverse events were reported, 14 were classified as possibly related to VB-111. All events were of CTCAE grade 1-2 except one grade 3 pulmonary embolism. There were no study related deaths. One patient developed peri-tumoral edema, which resolved with corticosteroid therapy. Events occurring in > 10% of the patients included headache and fatigue. Conclusions: VB-111 was safe and well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM with repeat doses of up to 1x1013 VPs. Tumor responses were seen. Overall survival was about 3 months longer than historical data in recurrent GBM, including standard of care anti-angiogenic agents. Data suggests that VB-111 potentiates the response to bevacizumab given at further progression. Clinical trial information: NCT01260506.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document