Transnational Law

Author(s):  
Philip Liste

Transnational law (TL) reacts to normative demands in world society and thus covers normative worlds beyond both domestic and international realms. Inasmuch as domestic law structures relations among actors within the confines of a territorial state, and international law structures relations among states, TL can be understood to structure relations “across” states and state jurisdictions, thus transcending some of the normative confines just mentioned. The study of TL thus reacts to some conceptual challenges to a sociopolitical constellation in which the common distinctions between the “domestic” and the “international,” as well as between “public” and “private” forms of regulation, are put into question and can no longer be trusted as effective thinking tools. Although work in international studies (broadly conceived) has long challenged the narrow conceptions of interstate politics and accounted for the varieties of themes in globalization, a vibrant body of work on TL now available in the fields of international legal studies (ILS) but also legal studies more broadly (e.g., in the field of law and society studies) has not yet found much replication in international relations (IR) theory. However, since TL can be said to correspond to transnational relations as introduced to IR theory mainly from the 1970s onward, theoretical and empirical engagement with TL will find an indeed rich conceptual context in international studies, the latter understood as an interdisciplinary scholarly endeavor. It needs to be noted, however, that for disciplinary fields using the term “international” as a significant part of their identity, thinking the “transnational” is a double-edged sword. Inasmuch as the meaning and relevance of the term “international” are put into question, disciplines risk putting into question their own relevance. However, facing globalization and the putative complexity of new constellations of actors and processes, international studies did indeed engage in some discussion on alternative framings of its main subject—with the “world,” the “global,” and last but not least the “transnational” as promising candidates. At the same time, while international law has become a hot topic in IR, this has not yet led to much acknowledgment of the role that transnational law plays in what is perhaps a newly emerging political constellation. Although work on transnational actors and networks of governance, as well as on the emergence of private authority beyond the state, has indeed touched on issues for which legal regulation is of a remarkable relevance, this has not stimulated much engagement with how TL is discussed in legal studies. Thus understood, for IR there is still much to be explored in the legal study’s work on TL, including transnational legal process, transnational legal theory, or transnational legal pluralism. Vice versa, legal studies could benefit from work in a tradition of political science, especially with regard to an understanding of the political consequences of a transnationalization of law and global normative order more generally. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of work on TL, though by inviting an interdisciplinary account of literature. The featured books and articles include work on TL in legal studies, as well as those publications in IR, which may provide the grounds for a soon-to-be lively discussion on TL and the role it plays in world society. Furthermore, the overview also entails work in fields such as sociology, anthropology, and geography, which have already explored TL as a rich phenomenon.

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Cotterrell

AbstractThe work of the Polish–Russian scholar Leon Petrażycki from the early decades of the twentieth century holds a strikingly paradoxical position in the literature of juristic and socio-legal scholarship: on the one hand, lauded as a supremely valuable contribution to knowledge about the nature of law and, on the other, widely neglected and little known. This paper asks how far Petrażycki's theories, expressed in writings by and about him available to an international readership, can provide insight for contemporary socio-legal studies – not as historical background but as living ideas. How far can his work speak to current issues and inform current debates? What obstacles stand in the way of this? Why have few international scholars engaged with his theories despite their rigour and originality? The paper starts from this last issue before addressing the others. It argues that Petrażycki's radical legal theory offers strikingly distinctive resources for rethinking issues about the role of law in multicultural societies, the nature of developing transnational law, and the significance of law as an aspect or expression of culture.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 929-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip G. Bevans ◽  
John S. McKay

The Association of Transnational Law Schools [ATLAS] is a consortium of seven law schools from four continents that launched an annual academic summer program, called the Agora, for doctoral students this past July 2008. As the name of the consortium would suggest, the program focused on transnational law. The Agora is one of several multi-school initiatives aimed at furthering the study of the globalizing legal environment. The Agora both reflects and furthers a trend in legal scholarship, and as a consequence legal education, toward a focus on a set of interrelated concerns, which include globalization, international governance, transnational law, comparative legal studies, legal transplantation and the apparent conceptual challenges that these pose. In important respects these new conceptual challenges have a long pedigree in questions about the scope of legal pedagogy and theory. The pedagogical controversy is rooted in questions about the purpose of legal education, namely, whether it is trade training and should focus on practical legal skills, or whether it should be conceived of as broader than this. Intimately connected to this pedagogical controversy is a legal-theoretical controversy about the scope of legal theory (and thus the nature of law and its investigation). Does the word “law” designate the organizational instruments of state power, or should we think of “law” as referring to a more diverse set of social-organizational systems that may have greater or less affinity and connection with state law?


Author(s):  
Frank G. Madsen

The intersection of international organization and crime and corruption has been garnering increasing interest from international studies scholars and practitioners. An international organization can be defined, following the International Law Commission, as an “organization established by a treaty or other instrument governed by international law and possessing its own international legal personality.” International organizations generally have States as members, but often other entities can also apply for membership. They both make international law and are governed by it. Yet, the decision-making process of international organizations is often less a question of law than one of political judgment. Meanwhile, corruption is a form of dishonest or unethical conduct by a person, or an institution, entrusted with a position of authority, often to acquire personal benefit. Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement, though it may also involve practices that are legal in many countries. Government, or 'political', corruption occurs when an office-holder or other governmental employee acts in an official capacity for personal gain. Strangely, the most important contribution to the field of organized crime did not come from criminology, legal studies, or international studies, but from philosophy. Recognizing both criminal law and international relations as the exercise of power, Michel Foucault introduced radically new thinking in the area of societal control in relation to the study of organized crime.


AJIL Unbound ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 413-417
Author(s):  
Guy Fiti Sinclair

When contemplating the transnational futures of international labor law, it is worthwhile pausing to reflect on the origins of that body of law and its relationship to the idea of transnationalism itself. Seeking to establish the universality of human problems, Philip Jessup famously defined transnational law as “all law which regulates actions or events that transcend national frontiers,” including both public and private international law as well as “other rules which do not fully fit into such standard categories.” This concept has proven extraordinarily durable, impacting legal theory in a variety of fields, not least transnational labor law. It is noteworthy, however, that Jessup's foundational text makes only a handful of references to the International Labour Organization (ILO) and instead focusses to a much greater extent on problems involving other aspects of international economic relations. This short essay connects and compares Jessup's concept of transnationalism to another conceptual framework in international law, devised at around the same time, which has a more direct lineage in the practice of the ILO and, perhaps, a place in its future development.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 859-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Scott

I shall use, instead of ‘international law', the term ‘transnational law' to include all law which regulates actions or events that transcend national frontiers. Both public and private international law are included, as are other rules which do not wholly fit into such standard categories.Philip Jessup, Transnational Law 136 (1956)


Author(s):  
Pavlo Voitovych ◽  
Kateryna Bondarenko ◽  
Ruslan Ennan ◽  
Alina Havlovska ◽  
Vladyslav Shliienko

In modern conditions of development of public relations, the creation of objects of intellectual property rights by artificial intelligence is becoming more widespread. With this in mind, it is important to analyze the international legal experience of regulating the use of artificial intelligence as the author of intellectual property, to further borrow it for domestic laws, as well as to pay attention to problematic aspects of such regulation and make proposals to resolve inconsistencies. The study clarifies the international legal regulation of intellectual property rights created by artificial intelligence, as well as analyses the problematic issues of regulation of artificial intelligence by international law and the features of such regulation in Ukraine and presents positions on the development of artificial intelligence systems and prospects, as well as the prospects for its impact on world society.


Author(s):  
Nicole Scicluna

This chapter discusses international law (IL) and international relations (IR) theory. It studies legal theory in order to better understand what law is, and how IL compares with domestic law. The chapter then introduces the major schools of IR theory, with a focus on how they conceptualize IL and its role in enabling and constraining the conduct of international politics. The disciplinary estrangement between IR and IL began to ease at the end of the 1980s. By that time there were already important strands within IR, including the English School, that were seeking to explain the prevalence of cooperation in an anarchical international system. New generations of IR scholars began theorizing the role of IL in structuring international politics, particularly from the perspectives of liberalism and constructivism, as well as from a range of critical approaches.


Resonance ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-327
Author(s):  
Shuhei Hosokawa

Drawing on Karin Bijsterveld’s triple definition of noise as ownership, political responsibility, and causal responsibility, this article traces how modern Japan problematized noise, and how noise represented both the aspirational discourse of Western civilization and the experiential nuisance accompanying rapid changes in living conditions in 1920s Japan. Primarily based on newspaper archives, the analysis will approach the problematic of noise as it was manifested in different ways in the public and private realms. In the public realm, the mid-1920s marked a turning point due to the reconstruction work after the Great Kantô Earthquake (1923) and the spread of the use of radios, phonographs, and loudspeakers. Within a few years, public opinion against noise had been formed by a coalition of journalists, police, the judiciary, engineers, academics, and municipal officials. This section will also address the legal regulation of noise and its failure; because public opinion was “owned” by middle-class (sub)urbanites, factory noises in downtown areas were hardly included in noise abatement discourse. Around 1930, the sounds of radios became a social problem, but the police and the courts hesitated to intervene in a “private” conflict, partly because they valued radio as a tool for encouraging nationalist mobilization and transmitting announcements from above. In sum, this article investigates the diverse contexts in which noise was perceived and interpreted as such, as noise became an integral part of modern life in early 20th-century Japan.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Keir

<div class="page" title="Page 3"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Veronika is a recent graduate from the Honours Legal Studies program at the University of Waterloo. Her passions are socio-legal research, policy development, feminist legal theory, and crime control development. Veronika is currently working a full-time job at Oracle Canada, planning on pursuing further education in a Masters program. </span></p></div></div></div>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document