Soil Ecology

Ecology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franciska T. De Vries ◽  
Richard D. Bardgett

The study of soil ecology has a long tradition. Most of this interest, until relatively recently, has been from an agricultural perspective, but now it is widely accepted that soil ecology is central to the study of terrestrial ecology. Early research in soil ecology was largely descriptive, detailing the abundance of diversity of organisms in soils of different habitats. However, interest in functional soil ecology started in the 1980s with studies of trophic interactions in soil and their importance for nutrient cycles and decomposition. Now, the topic has blossomed, with the help of new technologies that allow the study of soil organisms and their activities in situ, and there is currently widespread recognition that soil ecology is fundamental to our understanding of the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems and their response to global change. Today, the field of soil ecology is dominated by discussions on the use of new molecular tools that enable ecologists to understand what regulates patterns of diversity in soil, the functional role of soil biodiversity and plant-soil interactions, especially those that occur at the root-soil interface, and the role of soil biological communities in regulating ecosystem responses to global change, including the global carbon cycle under climate change. Many challenges still remain in soil ecology, and perhaps the most significant is the need for a stronger theoretical basis for the subject; almost all studies in this area have been carried out from an empirical perspective, and modeling approaches are still in their infancy. As a consequence, our ability to make predictions about the role of soil biological interactions and feedbacks in regulating terrestrial ecosystem processes and their response to global change remains limited.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris R Taylor ◽  
Ben Keane ◽  
Iain Hartley ◽  
Gareth Phoenix

<p>Terrestrial ecosystems absorb 30% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, slowing its rising atmospheric concentration and substantially inhibiting climate change. This uptake is believed to be due to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> (eCO<sub>2</sub>) stimulating plant photosynthesis and growth, thus increasing carbon (C) storage in plants and soil organic matter. However, nitrogen (N) limitation can reduce ecosystem C uptake capacity under eCO<sub>2</sub> by as much as 50%. Phosphorus (P) limitation in ecosystems is almost as common as N-limitation and is increasing due to ongoing deposition of N from anthropogenic activities. Despite this, we do not know how P-limited ecosystems will respond to eCO<sub>2</sub>, constituting a major gap in our understanding of how large areas of the biosphere will impact atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> over the coming decades.</p><p>In the first study conducted into the effect of eCO<sub>2</sub> on P-limited ecosystems with manipulated nutrient availability, the Phosphorus Limitation And ecosystem responses to Carbon dioxide Enrichment project (PLACE), investigates the effects of eCO<sub>2</sub> on C cycling in grasslands, which are a critical global C store. Turf mesocosms from P-limited acidic and limestone grasslands, where N and P inputs have been manipulated for 20 years (control, low N (3.5 g m<sup>-2</sup> y<sup>-1</sup>), high N (14 g m<sup>-2</sup> y<sup>-1</sup>), and P (3.5 g m<sup>-2</sup> y<sup>-1</sup>)), have been exposed to either ambient or eCO<sub>2</sub> (600 ppm) in a miniFACE (mini Free Air Carbon Enrichment) system. Long-term P addition has alleviated P limitation while N additions have exacerbated it. The two contrasting grasslands contain different amounts of organic versus mineral P in their soils and, thus, plants may have to use contrasting strategies to acquire the additional P they need to increase growth rates under elevated CO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>We present data from the first two growing seasons, including above and below ground productivity, and C, N and P cycling through plant, soil and microbial pools. Aboveground harvest data from the second year have shown eCO<sub>2</sub> has only increased biomass production in the limestone grassland (by 17%; p< 0.0001), and not in the acid grassland. There was also a significant effect of nutrient treatment (p< 0.001) with biomass increasing under P and HN, indicating some co-NP limitation. Stable isotope tracing, using the fumigation CO<sub>2</sub> signal has shown the fate of newly assimilated C and its contribution to gaseous C flux to the atmosphere in the form of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and respired CO<sub>2</sub>.  In summary, our first two years of eCO<sub>2</sub> treatment suggests that productivity of limestone and acidic grassland respond differently and that these responses depend on nutrient availability, indicating the complexity of predicting P-limited ecosystem responses as atmospheric CO<sub>2 </sub>continues to rise.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Fernández-Martínez ◽  
Jordi Sardans ◽  
Josep Peñuelas ◽  
Ivan Janssens

<p>Global change is affecting the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to sequester carbon. While the effect of climate on ecosystem carbon balance has largely been explored, the role of other potentially important factors that may shift with global change, such as biodiversity and the concentration of nutrients remains elusive. More diverse ecosystems have been shown to be more productive and stable over time and differences in foliar concentrations of N and P are related to large differences in how primary producers function. Here, we used 89 eddy-covariance sites included in the FLUXNET 2015 database, from which we compiled information on climate, species abundance and elemental composition of the main species. With these data, we assessed the relative importance of climate, endogenous factors, biodiversity and community-weighted concentrations of foliar N and P on terrestrial carbon balance. Climate and endogenous factors, such as stand age, are the main determinants of terrestrial C balance and their interannual variability in all types of ecosystems. Elemental stoichiometry, though, played a significant role affecting photosynthesis, an effect that propagates through ecosystem respiration and carbon sequestration. Biodiversity, instead, had a very limited effect on terrestrial carbon balance. We found increased respiration rates and more stable gross primary production with increasing diversity. Our results are the first attempt to investigate the role of biodiversity and the elemental composition of terrestrial ecosystems in ecosystem carbon balance.</p>


1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 729-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. SWIFT ◽  
O. ANDRÉN ◽  
L. BRUSSAARD ◽  
M. BRIONES ◽  
M. -M. COUTEAUX ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 366 (6467) ◽  
pp. 886-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias C. Rillig ◽  
Masahiro Ryo ◽  
Anika Lehmann ◽  
Carlos A. Aguilar-Trigueros ◽  
Sabine Buchert ◽  
...  

Soils underpin terrestrial ecosystem functions, but they face numerous anthropogenic pressures. Despite their crucial ecological role, we know little about how soils react to more than two environmental factors at a time. Here, we show experimentally that increasing the number of simultaneous global change factors (up to 10) caused increasing directional changes in soil properties, soil processes, and microbial communities, though there was greater uncertainty in predicting the magnitude of change. Our study provides a blueprint for addressing multifactor change with an efficient, broadly applicable experimental design for studying the impacts of global environmental change.


1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Smallidge ◽  
Anthony R. Brach ◽  
Irene R. Mackun

Watershed liming has been proposed to mitigate lake acidification and depletion of soil base cations. This paper reviews and synthesizes literature describing the effects of liming on natural terrestrial ecosystems, with a specific emphasis on watershed liming studies. Specifically, we look at the purpose of liming, types of lime, physiological role of calcium, lime effects on soil and belowground processes, and plant response to liming with special attention to growth and tissue chemistry, roots, and plant–plant interactions. Liming increases soil pH and either increases or decreases soil nutrient availability. Liming affects litter decomposition, mineral soil processes, root growth, plant nutrient uptake, and plant productivity. Interspecific plant interactions can be affected after liming. Specific soil and biotic responses depend upon the type and amount of lime applied, the period of observation, soil characteristics, and species composition.Key words: watershed liming, CaCO3, calcite, dolomite, calcium, ecosystem response to liming, wetland liming, forest liming, nutrient availability, soil acidity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document