scholarly journals Competitive Heterogeneity

Management ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy L. Madsen

It is widely accepted that positioning for competitive advantage is related to how value is created and captured. Yet, despite substantial theoretical work on competitive advantage, empirical work has been less cohesive and accretive. Contributing factors include, but are not limited to, differences in conceptual definitions, misalignment between theory and operational designs, and variation in analytical approaches. In response, the theory of competitive heterogeneity emerged with the intent of providing a more comprehensive explanation of persistent differences in intra-industry performance, the core focus of the strategy field. Formally, competitive heterogeneity refers to enduring and systematic (superior) differences in strategic positioning—and, in turn, performance—among relatively close rivals, where a firm that produces the largest gap between the value (V) of a good or service to a buyer and the cost (C) of producing that value holds an advantage, or superior position, relative to that of rivals. The theory adopts a bargaining model (Value-Price-Cost) to define superior performance differences independently of resources and capabilities. If resources or capabilities associated with performance heterogeneity are not protectable, then the persistence of an advantage must be associated with something other than costly imitation. It follows, then, that important sources of value and cost differences among firms may lie outside the Resource-Based View’s (RBV’s) boundaries. As such, work on competitive heterogeneity has broader theoretical roots than the RBV. Additionally, research on the factors and conditions promoting persistent and systematic (superior) differences in performance among firms benefits from the integration of multiple theoretical lenses, research methods, and techniques. This diversity informs a wide array of research topics (e.g., the Value-Price-Cost model; value-based strategies; value creation and value capture dynamics; value appropriation; performance heterogeneity; persistent performance heterogeneity; temporary advantage; isolating mechanisms and barriers to imitation; micro and macro influences) and employs a host of analytical techniques (empirical, descriptive, formal theory, mathematical modeling). This bibliography discusses the contributions from these complementary areas but the bibliography’s scope (and page limits) precludes a detailed treatment of all areas that intersect with competitive heterogeneity and its origins. As a result, and guided by the definition of competitive heterogeneity, this annotated bibliography provides an overview of the primary research streams, with specific attention to influential writings and those that detail the scope of contributions in an area. The research topics are presented in a particular order, beginning with the theory’s core, the Value-Price-Cost bargaining model, conceptual definitions, and theoretical insights, and then shifting to empirical studies on performance heterogeneity, persistent advantage, and value creation and capture.

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 04006
Author(s):  
Louis Lim Vui Han ◽  
Vijayesvaran Arumugam ◽  
Lawrence Arokiasamy

This study will be a bit different than others in the sense that it pierces directly into the human hearts. The world current economy is full of mysterious and uncertainty. There are plenty of different perspectives, but who can guarantee that they are right? The root of the problems of all issues generally come from the human heart or action. If we able to deal with human issues, it sorts out almost all the problems. The purpose of this study is to determine the contributing factors towards the sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) of small and medium-sized accounting firms (SMPs) in Malaysia. It aims to have a long-term impact on the prospects for the practitioners and the accounting professions. It becomes an attention to the world when numerous accounting scandals being published, and they jeopardized the accounting professions’ reputations. There are a few undisclosed cases especially it dealt with compliance, corporate tax, GST, money laundering and other issues, not only in Malaysia but in other countries as well. As such, the study focuses on creating better humans. Key findings from the literature highlighted the deficiencies in the core competencies of the firms. They are related to human capital and most of the researchers pinpointed the importance of knowledge, skills, capabilities in which it links to competencies in the corporate environment. The resource-based view of the firm is a common theory used by researchers as a mean of explaining competitive advantage and superior performance amongst the firms. And most of them stress the necessity to meet customer needs and expectation to create a sustainable competitive advantage.


Author(s):  
Karim Moustaghfir ◽  
Giovanni Schiuma

Today’s business landscape is increasingly complex and turbulent, forcing firms to develop their capabilities in order to be able to face macro-forces such as globalization, hyper-competition, reduced product cycles and continuous innovation. In such a competitive scenario, firms have to identify and manage the crucial resources and sources for competitive advantage. The management literature has identified knowledge assets as critical drivers of performance and value creation. However, the understanding of how these strategic resources contribute to shape the organisational value creation dynamics still remains a concern to be fully disclosed. Especially the dynamic nature of knowledge assets and how they contribute to firm performance need to be clarified. This chapter, on the basis of a systematic literature review, aims to define a theoretical framework to explain how knowledge asset define the pillars to shape organisational capabilities and provide firms with a sustainable competitive advantage and long-term superior performance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050015 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS CLAUSS ◽  
RICARDA B. BOUNCKEN ◽  
SVEN LAUDIEN ◽  
SASCHA KRAUS

Previous studies often assume that business model innovation (BMI) is reflected in an entrepreneurial business model design. We assume that business model reconfiguration (BMR) takes place in more nuanced types and does not always lead to (radical) BMI. By undertaking a mixed methods study with 213 respectively 16 SMEs from the electronic industry, we uncover six basically different types of BMRs and discuss their performance implications. By this, we shape the current understanding of BMR and shed light on variety and implications of different types of BMRs. Our configuration study indicates that firms achieve superior performance when implementing a radically new business model reflected in a new configuration of all three components of the business model: value creation, value proposition, and value capture. Second, BMR can take place in types where only some parts of the business model are extensively changed, while others are only slightly adapted.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaila M Miranda ◽  
C Bruce Kavan

Research on the governance of IS outsourcing has recognized two moments of governance: the formal outsourcing contract (promissory contract) and post-contractual relationship management (psychological contract). While this research has been prescriptive of contract terms that lead to successful outsourcing, there is need for clarity on what specific governance options are available at each moment of governance and how governance choices at one moment affect those at another, and consequently affect outsourcing outcomes. This paper draws on theoretical and empirical work in the areas of governance and contracts to develop a model of IS outsourcing governance, delineating specific moments of governance (MoG). It describes how the IS outsourcing context circumscribes market, hierarchy, and network governance options that are available at the promissory contract and psychological contract moments. Processes and structures that constitute governance choices at each moment of governance are identified. This analysis of outcomes recognizes an inherent tension in interorganizational relationships: firms’ desire for value capture or efficiency vs their desire for value creation or innovation. We explore how choices in formulating the promissory contract affect the psychological contract, and how psychological contract choices impact value capture and creation. The paper concludes by exploring the implications of the MoG model for practitioners and suggesting areas in which further conceptualization and empirical work may be beneficial.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 453-463
Author(s):  
Valentina Della Corte ◽  
Giovanna Del Gaudio

The aim of this research paper is twofold: first, to verify whether and to what extent employees’ productivity influences firm’s value creation and performance; secondly, if and to what extent employees appropriate part of firm’s value. We focus empirically on a selected sample of firms in airline industry, in order to check if personnel’s productivity creates value, thus contributing to firm performance and sustainable competitive advantage. The reason why we chose this industry is because in this sector operations are critical factors in firm performance


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document