scholarly journals 318. Deferring Amputation in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Doing more Harm than Good?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S231-S232
Author(s):  
Shiwei Zhou ◽  
Brian M Schmidt ◽  
Oryan Henig ◽  
Keith S Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Knee Amputation ◽  
Management Group ◽  
One Year ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Abstract Background Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a leading cause of below knee amputation (BKA). Even when medical treatment is deemed unlikely to succeed, patients with DFO are often resistant to amputation. Methods An observational cohort analysis was done on patients with DFO at Michigan Medicine who were evaluated by podiatry and recommended BKA from Oct 2015 - Jun 2019. Primary outcome was mortality after BKA recommendation. Secondary outcomes were healing of affected limb, rate of BKA or above knee amputation (AKA) and total antibiotic days in the 6 months following. All intravenous antibiotics and oral courses of linezolid and fluoroquinolones were captured. Results Of 44 patients with DFO, 18 chose BKA, 26 chose medical management with wound care. Mean age of the cohort was 61, 68% male, 80% white with a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6 (IQR 4,7). The two groups were similar with regards to demographics and comorbid conditions. Those who chose medical management did so because their infection was non-life-threatening and they desired to avoid amputation. One-year mortality was greater in patients who were medically managed compared to those who had BKA (23.1% vs 0%, OR 11.7, 95% CI 0.6–222.9). Considering only the 33 patients who were followed for at least 2 years, 2-year mortality was also greater in the medically managed group compared to the BKA group (38.5% vs 5.6%, OR 10.6, 95% CI 1.2–92.7, Figure 1). Fewer patients in the medical management group had complete healing of their wound/stump compared to the BKA group (46.2% vs 88.9%, OR 9.3, 95% CI 1.8–49.1). In the medically managed group, 18 (69%) patients went on to require BKA or AKA at a median of 76.5 days compared to 2 (11%) in the BKA group who required AKA at 1 and 11 days following recommendation. Median antibiotic days were significantly greater in the medically managed group compared to the BKA group (55 IQR 42,78 vs 17 IQR 10,37, p=0.0017). Conclusion In this cohort of DFO patients where BKA was recommended, medical management was associated with increased mortality, poor healing of the affected limb, and excess antibiotic exposure compared to BKA. These findings are particularly notable as case mix and severity of illness were similar between the two groups. This study can be used to inform providers and patients in cases where BKA is recommended. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Application of a collagen matrix dressing on a neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer: a randomised control trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (Sup3) ◽  
pp. S13-S18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gholamreza Esmaeeli Djavid ◽  
Seyed Mehdi Tabaie ◽  
Siamak Bashardoust Tajali ◽  
Mehrangiz Totounchi ◽  
Amirreza Farhoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Number Of Patients

Objective: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are often hard-to-heal, despite standard care. With such a complicated healing process, any advanced wound care to aid healing is recommended. Chitosan/collagen composite hydrogel materials have the potential to promote the regenerative process. In this study, the efficacy of a new collagen matrix dressing including chitosan/collagen hydrogel was compared with a standard dressing of saline-moistened gauze for wound healing in patients with a hard-to-heal neuropathic DFU. Method: This is an open labelled, randomised clinical trial. After conventional therapy consisting of debridement, infection control and offloading, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a collagen matrix dressing (the study group, receiving Tebaderm manufacturer) or a saline-moistened gauze dressing (control group) for wound care. The reduction in DFU size and the number of patients with complete healing were measured throughout the treatment and in follow-up. Results: A total of 61 patients with a neuropathic DFU were recruited. Average percentage reduction in DFU size at four weeks was greater in the study group compared with the control group (54.5% versus 38.8%, respectively). Rate of complete healing rate at 20-weeks' follow-up was significantly better in the study group than the control group (60% versus 35.5%, respectively). Conclusion: The collagen matrix dressing used in this study accelerated the healing process of patients with a hard-to-heal DFU. Further research may suggest the used of this dressing to shorten the length of time to achieve complete healing.

Successful Limb-sparing Treatment Strategy for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M. Beieler ◽  
Timothy C. Jenkins ◽  
Connie S. Price ◽  
Carla C. Saveli ◽  
Merribeth Bruntz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Surgical Debridement ◽  
Knee Amputation ◽  
End Point ◽  
Below The Knee ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is common and causes substantial morbidity, including major amputations, yet the optimal treatment approach is unclear. We evaluated an approach to limb salvage that combines early surgical debridement or limited amputation with antimicrobial therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated between May 1, 2005, and May 31, 2007. The primary end point was cure, defined as not requiring further treatment for osteomyelitis of the affected limb. The secondary end point was limb salvage, defined as not requiring a below-the-knee amputation or a more proximal amputation. Results: Fifty patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis met the study criteria. Initial surgical management included local amputation in 43 patients (86%) and debridement without amputation in seven (14%). Most infections (n = 30; 60%) were polymicrobial, and Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (n = 23; 46%). Parenteral antibiotics were used in 45 patients (90%). Patients who had pathologic evidence of osteomyelitis at the surgical margin received therapy for a median of 43 days (interquartile range [IQR], 36–56 days), whereas those without evidence of residual osteomyelitis received therapy for a median of 19 days (IQR, 13–40 days). Overall, 32 patients (64%) were considered cured after a median follow-up of 26 months (IQR, 12–38 months). Fifteen of 18 patients (83%) who failed initial therapy were treated again with limb-sparing surgery. Limb salvage was achieved in 47 patients (94%), with only three patients (6%) requiring below-the-knee amputation. Conclusions: In patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, surgical debridement or limited amputation plus antimicrobial therapy is effective at achieving clinical cure and limb salvage. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(4): 273–277, 2012)

Risk Factors for Below-the-Knee Amputation in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis After Minor Amputation

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney Miller ◽  
Chrystal Berg ◽  
Michael L. Wilson ◽  
Susan Heard ◽  
Bryan Knepper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Knee Amputation ◽  
Below The Knee ◽  
Minor Amputation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Transmetatarsal Amputation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Background:Below-the-knee amputation (BKA) can be a detrimental outcome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Ideal treatment of DFO is controversial, but studies suggest minor amputation reduces the risk of BKA. We evaluated risk factors for BKA after minor amputation for DFO.Methods:This is a retrospective cohort of patients discharged from Denver Health Medical Center from February 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014. Patients who underwent minor amputation for diagnosis of DFO were eligible for inclusion. The outcome evaluated was BKA in the 6 months after minor amputation.Results:Of 153 episodes with DFO that met the study criteria, 11 (7%) had BKA. Failure to heal surgical incision at 3 months (P < .001) and transmetatarsal amputation (P = .009) were associated with BKA in the 6 months after minor amputation. Peripheral vascular disease was associated with failure to heal but not with BKA (P = .009). Severe infection, bacteremia, hemoglobin A1c, and positive histopathologic margins of bone and soft tissue were not associated with BKA. The median antibiotic duration was 42 days for positive histopathologic bone resection margin (interquartile range, 32–47 days) and 16 days for negative margin (interquartile range, 8–29 days). Longer duration of antibiotics was not associated with lower risk of BKA.Conclusions:Patients who fail to heal amputation sites in 3 months or who have transmetatarsal amputation are at increased risk for BKA. Future studies should evaluate the impact of aggressive wound care or whether failure to heal is a marker of another variable.

scholarly journals 109. Evaluating Predictive Value of Surgical Resected Proximal Bone Margins in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis with Clinical Outcomes at One Year

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S67-S67
Author(s):  
Bruce Weng ◽  
Yasmin Oskooilar ◽  
Bishoy Zakhary ◽  
Chiao An Chiu ◽  
Nikki Mulligan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Hemoglobin A1c ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Positive Margins ◽  
Antibiotic Duration ◽  
One Year ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Abstract Background Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) remains a significant comorbidity in diabetes and often requires both surgical and medical interventions. Surgical bone resection with proximal margins is performed for treatment at our institution to guide antimicrobial therapy. Optimal antibiotic duration often remains unclear, along with clinical outcomes with negative margins. We evaluate if negative bone margins predict outcomes of DFO at one year in our county hospital. Methods A retrospectively cohort study assessed adult patients undergoing DFO amputations between 9/2016 to 9/2019. Patient data collected included demographics, smoking history, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), basic labs, microbiology, antibiotic duration, bone margin pathology. Physician review of records determined if intervention was successful. Primary outcome was met if no further amputation at the same site was required in the following 12 months. Results Of 92 patients, 57 had negative margins and 35 had positive margins for pathology confirmed osteomyelitis. Smoking history was significant in positive margins (35.1% vs 57.1%; p=0.038). Patients with negative margins had a successful outcome at 12 months compared to positive margins (86% vs 66%; p=0.003), but no significant differences in outcome at 6 months. Antibiotic days was reduced in negative margin individuals (mean 18 vs 30 days; p=0.001). Negative margins also demonstrated significant lower rates of readmission at 12 months (p=0.015). Staphylococcus aureus was notable in positive vs negative margins (57.1% vs 29.8%; p=0.017). MSSA was significantly noted in positive margins (45.7% vs 14%; p=0.001). MRSA was similar regardless of margin results (15.8% vs 11.4%; p=0.399). Initial ESR, CRP and HbA1c were similar between groups. Conclusion Our study noted that negative proximal bone margins resulted in more successful outcomes at 12 months and less days of antimicrobial therapy. Patients with negative margins had lower rates of readmission at 12 months for surgical site complications. Negative proximal bone margins results can guide antibiotic therapy and improve outcomes of resections. Presence of S. aureus was significant in positive margins and likely warrant consideration for further aggressive intervention. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis Clinical demographics, antibiotic usage, microbiology and results of patients presenting for diabetic foot osteomyelitis needing surgical amputation intervention. Abbreviations: HbA1c - Hemoglobin A1c; MSSA - methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA - methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; CRP -C-reactive protein; ESR - erythrocyte sedimentation rate Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Below the Knee Amputation in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney Hernandez ◽  
Heather Young ◽  
Bryan Knepper ◽  
Susan Heard ◽  
Michael Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Knee Amputation ◽  
Below The Knee ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

scholarly journals Deferring Amputation in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Doing More Harm Than Good?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiwei Zhou ◽  
Brian M Schmidt ◽  
Oryan Henig ◽  
Keith S Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Knee Amputation ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Abstract In a cohort of patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis who were recommended to undergo below-knee amputation, those who deferred amputation and chose medical therapy were more likely to die during the follow up time compared to those who proceeded with amputation.

Super-Oxidized Solution (Dermacyn Wound Care) as Adjuvant Treatment in the Postoperative Management of Complicated Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Aragón-Sánchez ◽  
Jose Luis Lázaro-Martínez ◽  
Yurena Quintana-Marrero ◽  
Irene Sanz-Corbalán ◽  
Maria J. Hernández-Herrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Experience of negative pressure wound therapy over sternal wound healing: A retrospective review

WCET Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-18
Author(s):  
Wai Sze Ho ◽  
Wai Kuen Lee ◽  
Ka Kay Chan ◽  
Choi Ching Fong
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
Wound Assessment ◽  
One Year

Objectives The aim of this study was to retrospectively review the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in sternal wound healing with the use of the validated Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), and explore the role of NPWT over sternal wounds and future treatment pathways. Methods Data was gathered from patients' medical records and the institution's database clinical management system. Seventeen subjects, who had undergone cardiothoracic surgeries and subsequently consulted the wound care team in one year were reviewed. Fourteen of them were included in the analysis. Healing improvement of each sternal wound under continuous NPWT and continuous conventional dressings was studied. In total, 23 continuous NPWT and 13 conventional dressing episodes were analysed with the BWAT. Results Among conventional dressing episodes, sternal wound improvement was 2.5–3% over 10 days to 3.5 weeks, whereas 4–5% sternal healing was achieved in 5 days to 2 weeks with sternal wire presence. Better healing at 11% in 1 week by conventional dressing was attained after sternal wire removal. In NPWT episodes, 8–29%, 13–24%, and 15–46% of healing was observed in 2 weeks, 3.5 to 5 weeks and 6 to 7 weeks, respectively. Only 39% wound healing was acquired at the 13th week of NPWT in one subject. With sternal wire present, 6%–29% wound healing progress was achieved by NPWT in 1–4 weeks, and 16–23% wound improvement in 2 to 4.5 weeks by NWPT after further surgical debridement. After sternal wire removal, 6–34% sternal wound healing occurred by continuous NPWT for 1–2 weeks, and maximum healing at 46% after 2.5 weeks of NPWT were observed. Conclusions Better wound healing was achieved in the NPWT group in comparison to conventional dressings alone. However, suboptimal sternal wound healing by NPWT alone was observed. Removal of sternal wire may improve the effectiveness of NPWT. Successful tertiary closure after NPWT among subjects supports the important bridging role of NPWT in sternal wound healing. Factors causing stagnant sternal wound healing by NPWT alone are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document