scholarly journals 941. Isavuconazole Prophylaxis Against Invasive Fungal Infection: A Pooled Analysis with a Comparison of Posaconazole Delayed-release Tablet Prophylaxis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S564-S564
Author(s):  
Chaeryoung Lee ◽  
Sung Kwan Hong ◽  
Jong Hun Kim

Abstract Background There are limited data regarding the use of isavuconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis against invasive fungal infection (IFI) among immunocompromised patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess efficacy and breakthrough IFIs of isavuconazole prophylaxis by a pooled analysis of the reported cases of isavuconazole prophylaxis with a comparison of cases of posaconazole delayed-release tablet prophylaxis. Methods Pubmed was searched for English-written articles published up to April 2021. Studies that reported cases of primary antifungal prophylaxis with isavuconazole or posaconazole delayed-release tablet in adults ≥ 18 years were reviewed. Breakthrough IFI was defined as the occurrence of proven or probable IFI while on prophylaxis. Results For overall isavuconazole prophylaxis, a total of 818 courses of prophylaxis was identified from 12 studies. Breakthrough IFIs were noted in 41 patients. The median duration of isavuconazole prophylaxis of these patients before the diagnosis of IFI was 17 days. The most common breakthrough IFI was candidiasis (34.1%), followed by aspergillosis (24.4%) and mucormycosis (12.2%). Sixteen patients died (39.0%). Among patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, isavuconazole prophylaxis (404 courses) was compared with posaconazole delayed-release tablet prophylaxis (1952 courses). The incidence rate of breakthrough IFIs was higher in the cohort of isavuconazole prophylaxis (24 patients of 404 courses) than in the cohort of posaconazole delayed-release tablet prophylaxis (44 patients of 1952 courses). Aspergillosis (40.9%) was the most common breakthrough IFI in the cohort of isavuconazole prophylaxis among patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, followed by candidiasis (27.3%) and mucormycosis (18.2%). Conclusion Although isavuconazole is licensed to treat aspergillosis and mucormycosis, breakthrough IFIs including aspergillosis, mucormycosis, and candidiasis may occur while on isavuconazole prophylaxis. Therefore, further studies are needed to define the benefits and risks of isavuconazole prophylaxis. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11020-11020
Author(s):  
Raheel Sufian Siddiqui ◽  
Moazzam Shahzad ◽  
Mahrukh Majeed ◽  
Ali Hussain ◽  
Faryal Murtaza ◽  
...  

11020 Background: Gender inequality in research funding has been studied extensively; however, the literature lacks evidence in Hematology. We investigated trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for hematologic malignancies (HM), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and cellular therapeutics (CT). Methods: The data on Hematology funding was retrieved from NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) Categorical Spending for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. A total of 6351 entries were reported. Only grants (n=1834) that were related to HM, HSCT, and CT were included. After excluding non-relevant, 975 principal investigators (PIs) were included in the analysis. Additional data regarding PIs was ascertained from the Scopus database, LinkedIn, Doximity, and departmental websites, including the number of publications, number of years of active research, H-index, highest degree, gender, and institution. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Bivariate analyses, using chi-square and t-test, and linear regression analyses were performed. Results: In 2018 and 2019, 1834 grants totaling $799.4 million were awarded by the NIH for malignant hematology research (men 1301, 71% vs women 533, 29%). Of 975 PIs, 680 (70%) were men and 295 (30%) were women. Table highlights gender disparities in NIH funding and associated factors. Most of the grant recipients were Ph.D. or M.D./Ph.D. About 70% of total funding was awarded to male PIs. There were no gender differences in the mean number of grants and mean grant amount. Women had significantly lower years of active research and academic productivity. Conclusions: Although the gender gap in academic hematology has decreased in recent years, the latest trend suggests significant gender inequality in NIH funding for malignant hematology, transplantation, and cellular therapy.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document