scholarly journals 162. Duration of Antibiotics Through Care Transitions: A Quality Improvement Initiative

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S191-S191
Author(s):  
Caitlin Soto ◽  
Kate Dzintars ◽  
Kate Dzintars ◽  
Sara C Keller
Keyword(s):  
Care Transitions ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Discharge Summary ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Duration

Abstract Background Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide, largely driven by excessive antibiotic use. Antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions have traditionally focused on acute care, long-term care, and ambulatory settings. However, as patients transition from one care setting to another, AS interventions should address antibiotic orders (agent, dose, duration) between the hospital and the home. The purpose of this study is to determine the appropriateness of a total course of antibiotics, including inpatient and outpatient prescriptions, to aid in prioritizing AS interventions. Methods A single-center, retrospective study was performed to evaluate antibiotic duration for adult patients discharged from a large quaternary-care academic hospital. All antibiotic prescribing data, including pre-admission, during admission, and after hospital discharge, as well as information on indication, was collected from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data collected. Results 196 patients were included in the study. There were 100 instances of disagreement on antibiotic indication between the discharge summary and reviewer. However, 70% of patients were discharged on an appropriate antibiotic. The majority of patients (75%) were prescribed excess antibiotic days beyond guideline recommended total duration, and 68% of patients did not have appropriate duration of antibiotics post-discharge. Of those with excess duration, 31% were prescribed penicillins, 23% were prescribed cephalosporins, and 20% were prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Excess antibiotic duration was associated most commonly with an unknown diagnosis (23%), a skin and soft tissue infection diagnosis (16%), and antibiotic prophylaxis (12%). Conclusion The results of this study showed that patients were often prescribed excess antibiotics at discharge, and the total duration of antibiotics from pre-admission to post-discharge were prolonged beyond guideline-recommended duration. Understanding the total duration of antibiotic prescription, including post-discharge and pre-admission durations, is key in assessing risk from antibiotics and targeting AS interventions. Disclosures Kate Dzintars, PharmD, Nothing to disclose

Antibiotic Use in Long-Term–Care Facilities: Many Unanswered Questions

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 680-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Loeb
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Quantitative Relation ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

AbstractThe extensive use of antibiotics in long-term–care facilities has led to increasing concern about the potential for the development of antibiotic resistance. Relatively little is known, however, about the quantitative relation between antibiotic use and resistance in this population. A better understanding of the underlying factors that account for variance in antibiotic use, unexplained by detected infections, is needed. To optimize antibiotic use, evidence-based standards for empirical antibiotic prescribing need to be developed. Limitations in current diagnostic testing for infection in residents of long-term–care facilities pose a substantial challenge to developing such standards.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial prescribing in long-term care facilities: a nationwide point-prevalence study, Slovenia, 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (46) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora Stepan ◽  
Lea Ušaj ◽  
Marija Petek Šter ◽  
Marjetka Smolinger Galun ◽  
Hermina Smole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Prevalence Study ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Point Prevalence Study ◽  
Care Facilities

Residents in long-term care are at high risk of infections because of their old age and many related health problems that lead to frequent antibiotic prescribing. The aim of the study was to assess antibiotic use in Slovenian long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The point-prevalence study was conducted between April and June 2016. Online questionnaires were sent to all Slovenian LTCFs. Eighty (68.4%) of the 117 LTCFs contacted, caring for 13,032 residents (70.6% of all Slovenian LTCF residents), responded to the survey. On the day of the study, the mean antibiotic prevalence per LTCF was 2.4% (95% confidence interval: 1.94–2.66). Most (70.2%) of the residents taking antibiotics were female. Most residents were being treated for respiratory tract (42.7%) or urinary tract (33.3%) infections. Co-amoxiclav and fluoroquinolones were the most frequently prescribed antibiotics (41.0% and 22.3% respectively). Microbiological tests were performed for 5.2% of residents receiving antibiotics. Forty nine (19.8%) residents receiving antibiotics were colonised with multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR). Antibiotic use in Slovenian LTCFs is not very high, but most prescribed antibiotics are broad-spectrum. Together with low use of microbiological testing and high prevalence of colonisation with MDR bacteria the situation is worrisome and warrants the introduction of antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

scholarly journals Antibiotic prescribing for residents in long-term-care facilities across the UK

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 1447-1451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey Thornley ◽  
Diane Ashiru-Oredope ◽  
Andrew Normington ◽  
Elizabeth Beech ◽  
Philip Howard
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Vulnerable Population ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health problem. Elderly residents in long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) are frequently prescribed antibiotics, particularly for urinary tract infections. Optimizing appropriate antibiotic use in this vulnerable population requires close collaboration between NHS healthcare providers and LTCF providers. Objectives Our aim was to identify and quantify antibiotic prescribing in elderly residents in UK LTCFs. This is part of a wider programme of work to understand opportunities for pharmacy teams in the community to support residents and carers. Methods This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Data were extracted from a national pharmacy chain database of prescriptions dispensed for elderly residents in UK LTCFs over 12 months (November 2016–October 2017). Results Data were analysed for 341536 residents in LTCFs across the four UK nations, from which a total of 544796 antibiotic prescriptions were dispensed for 167002 residents. The proportion of residents prescribed at least one antibiotic over the 12 month period varied by LTCF, by month and by country. Conclusions Whilst national data sets on antibiotic prescribing are available for hospitals and primary care, this is the first report on antibiotic prescribing for LTCF residents across all four UK nations, and the largest reported data set in this setting. Half of LTCF residents were prescribed at least one antibiotic over the 12 months, suggesting that there is an opportunity to optimize antibiotic use in this vulnerable population to minimize the risk of AMR and treatment failure. Pharmacy teams are well placed to support prudent antibiotic prescribing and improved antimicrobial stewardship in this population.

Antibiotic prescribing upon discharge from the hospital to long-term care facilities: Implications for antimicrobial stewardship requirements in post-acute settings

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo R. Weber ◽  
Brie N. Noble ◽  
David T. Bearden ◽  
Christopher J. Crnich ◽  
Katherine D. Ellingson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescription ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Care Facilities

AbstractObjectiveTo quantify the frequency and outcomes of receiving an antibiotic prescription upon discharge from the hospital to long-term care facilities (LTCFs).DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingA 576-bed, academic hospital in Portland, Oregon.PatientsAdult inpatients (≥18 years of age) discharged to an LTCF between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2016.MethodsOur primary outcome was receiving a systemic antibiotic prescription upon discharge to an LTCF. We also quantified the association between receiving an antibiotic prescription and 30-day hospital readmission, 30-day emergency department (ED) visit, and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) on a readmission or ED visit at the index facility within 60 days of discharge.ResultsAmong 6,701 discharges to an LTCF, 22.9% were prescribed antibiotics upon discharge. The most prevalent antibiotic classes prescribed were cephalosporins (20.4%), fluoroquinolones (19.1%), and penicillins (16.7%). The medical records of ~82% of patients included a diagnosis code for a bacterial infection on the index admission. Among patients prescribed an antibiotic upon discharge, the incidence of 30-day hospital readmission to the index facility was 15.9%, the incidence of 30-day ED visit at the index facility was 11.0%, and the incidence of CDI on a readmission or ED visit within 60 days of discharge was 1.6%. Receiving an antibiotic prescription upon discharge was significantly associated with 30-day ED visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.5) and with CDI within 60 days (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.02–2.8) but not with 30-day readmissions (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.9–1.2).ConclusionsAntibiotics were frequently prescribed upon discharge to LTCFs, which may be associated with increased risk of poor outcomes post discharge.

scholarly journals 199. Evaluating long-term care pharmacy dispense data to monitor antibiotic use in U.S. nursing homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S104-S104
Author(s):  
Katryna A Gouin ◽  
Stephen M Creasy ◽  
Manjiri Kulkarni ◽  
Martha Wdowicki ◽  
Nimalie D Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
National Level ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Courses

Abstract Background Automated reporting of antibiotic use (AU) in nursing homes (NHs) may help to identify opportunities to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and inform implementation of stewardship activities. The majority of U.S. NHs contract with long-term care (LTC) pharmacies to dispense prescriptions and provide medication monitoring and reviews. We investigated the feasibility of leveraging LTC pharmacy electronic dispensing data to describe AU in NHs. Methods We analyzed all NH antibiotic dispenses and monthly resident-days in 2017 reported by a large LTC pharmacy. The dispense-level data included facility and resident identifiers, antibiotic class and agent, dispense date and days of therapy (DOT) dispensed. We identified NH antibiotic courses, inclusive of both antibiotic starts and continuations from hospital-initiated courses, by collapsing dispenses of the same drug to the same resident if the subsequent dispense was within three days of the preceding end date. The course duration was the sum of DOT for all dispenses in the course. The AU rate was reported as DOT and courses per 1,000 resident-days. Results AU was described in 326,713 residents admitted to 1,348 NHs (9% of U.S. NHs), covering 38.1 million resident-days. There were 576,228 dispenses for a total of 3.3 million antibiotic DOT at a rate of 86 DOT/1,000 resident-days. After collapsing dispenses, 324,306 antibiotic courses were defined at a rate of 9 courses/1,000 resident-days. During the year, 45% of residents received an antibiotic. The most frequently prescribed classes by DOT and courses were cephalosporins, penicillins, urinary anti-infectives and quinolones (Fig. 1). The top agents by DOT were levofloxacin (12%), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (12%) and cephalexin (11%). Most course durations were 1–7 days (54%) or 8–14 days (35%) (Fig. 2). Long-term antibiotic courses (> 30 days) contributed to 5% of courses and 30% of overall DOT. The mean duration per course was 7.5 days when courses > 30 days were excluded. Figure 1. Distribution of antibiotic courses and days of therapy by antibiotic class for 324,306 antibiotic courses and 3.3 million days of antibiotic therapy dispensed to 1,348 nursing homes from a long-term care pharmacy in 2017 Figure 2. Distribution of antibiotic course duration and cumulative percent of total antibiotic days of therapy for 324,306 antibiotic courses dispensed to 1,348 nursing homes from a long-term care pharmacy in 2017 Conclusion LTC pharmacy dispenses may be an accessible data source to report NH AU rates and prescribing patterns by antibiotic class and agent. Further evaluation of data sources for facility- and national-level AU reporting in NHs is needed to support stewardship implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 14. Outcomes from the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use Across 439 Long-term Care Facilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S8-S8
Author(s):  
Morgan Katz ◽  
Theresa A Rowe ◽  
Sara E Cosgrove ◽  
Pranita D Tamma ◽  
Melissa A Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Safety Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Abstract Background Implementing effective antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) in long-term care (LTC) settings is challenging. We present the results of an intervention intended to change the culture of antibiotic prescribing in 439 United States LTC facilities (LTCF). Methods The LTC Safety Program assisted LTCFs with establishing and implementing ASPs from 12/2018 to 11/2019. Through webinars held 1–2 times per month and other educational content, the Safety Program emphasized 1) the science of safety to improve teamwork and identify antibiotic-associated harm and 2) clinical best practices in making antibiotic treatment decisions. Content was organized using the Four Moments of Antibiotic Decision Making Framework (Figure 1). All staff (e.g., physicians, nurses, nurse assistants) were encouraged to participate. LTCFs submitted monthly antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), numbers of new antibiotic starts, urine cultures (UCX) ordered, Clostridioides difficile LabID events, and census data. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to calculate pre-post intervention changes at bi-monthly intervals for antibiotic DOT, antibiotic starts and UCX, each per 1,000 resident-days (RD), and C. difficile LabID events per 10,000 RD, comparing the beginning (1/2019 and 2/2019) and end (11/2019 and 12/2019) of the Safety Program. Figure 1. Four Moments of Antibiotic Decision Making in the Long-Term Care Setting Results Of 439 LTCFs who completed the Safety program, the majority were mid-sized (75–149 beds; 229, 52.2%), most were non-hospital based and owned by a larger system (246, 56.0%), with similar distributions between urban and rural settings. Of these, 348 (79%) submitted both baseline and end-of-intervention data. Antibiotic starts decreased from 7.89 to 7.48 starts/1000 RD; P = 0.02). Days of therapy for all antibiotics decreased from 64.1 to 61.0 DOT/1,000 RD; P = 0.068) and for fluoroquinolones (an antibiotic targeted in the Safety Program) from 1.49 to 1.28 DOT/1,000RD; P=0.002. UCX decreased from 3.01 to 2.63 orders/1000 RD; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in C. difficile LabID events Table 1. Table 1. Changes from baseline (Jan-Feb, 2019) to the end (Nov-Dec, 2019) of the AHRQ Safety Program Conclusion By targeting both antibiotic prescribing culture and knowledge of best practices, the AHRQ Safety Program led to significant reductions in antibiotic use across a large cohort of LTCFs. Disclosures Morgan Katz, MD, MHS, AHRQ (Research Grant or Support)FutureCare Health Systems (Consultant)Roche (Advisor or Review Panel member) Robin Jump, MD, PhD, Accelerate (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Roche (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Infections and use of antibiotics in residents of long-term care facilities in Hungary

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (23) ◽  
pp. 911-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Szabó ◽  
Karolina Böröcz
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Tract Infections

Introduction: Healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial use are common among residents of long-term care facilities. Faced to the lack of standardized data, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control funded a project with the aim of estimating prevalence of infections and antibiotic use in European long-term care facilities. Aim: The aim of the authors was to present the results of the European survey which were obtained in Hungary. Method: In Hungary, 91 long-term care facilities with 11,823 residents participated in the point-prevalence survey in May, 2013. Results: The prevalence of infections was 2.1%. Skin and soft tissues infections were the most frequent (36%), followed by infections of the respiratory (30%) and urinary tract (21%). Antimicrobials were mostly prescribed for urinary tract infections (40.3%), respiratory tract infections (38.4%) and skin and soft tissue infections (13.2%). The most common antimicrobials (97.5%) belonged to the ATC J01 class of “antibacterials for systemic use”. Conclusions: The results emphasise the need for a national guideline and education for good practice in long-term care facilities. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(23), 911–917.

Addressing Communication Breakdowns during Emergency Care Transitions of Older Adults: Evaluation of a Standardized Inter-Facility Health Care Communication Form

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Patrick McLane ◽  
Kaitlyn Tate ◽  
R. Colin Reid ◽  
Brian H. Rowe ◽  
Carole Estabrooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Persons ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Usual Practice ◽  
Improvement Programs ◽  
Quality Improvement Programs ◽  
Communication Breakdowns

Abstract Transitions for older persons from long-term care (LTC) to the emergency department (ED) and back, can result in adverse events. Effective communication among care settings is required to ensure continuity of care. We implemented a standardized form for improving consistency of documentation during LTC to ED transitions of residents 65 years of age or older, via emergency medical services (EMS), and back. Data on form use and form completion were collected through chart review. Practitioners’ perspectives were collected using surveys. The form was used in 90/244 (37%) LTC to ED transitions, with large variation in data element completion. EMS and ED reported improved identification of resident information. LTC personnel preferred usual practice to the new form and twice reported prioritizing form completion before calling 911. To minimize risk of harmful unintended consequences, communication forms should be implemented as part of broader quality improvement programs, rather than as stand-alone interventions.

scholarly journals Factors influencing antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities: a qualitative in-depth study

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura W van Buul ◽  
Jenny T van der Steen ◽  
Sarah MMM Doncker ◽  
Wilco P Achterberg ◽  
François G Schellevis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Depth Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document