scholarly journals 2250. Combination Vancomycin Plus Cefazolin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S769-S769
Author(s):  
Sarah C J Jorgensen ◽  
Trang D Trinh ◽  
Evan J Zasowski ◽  
Sara Alosaimy ◽  
Sarah Melvin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Combination β-lactam and vancomycin (VAN) prevent the emergence of resistance and result in synergistic antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro. We sought to provide clinical translation to these data and determine if patients with MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI) treated with VAN + cefazolin (VAN/CFZ) via our MRSA BSI clinical pathway had improved clinical outcomes compared VAN alone. Methods Multicenter, retrospective, comparative cohort study from 2006 to 2019 in adults with MRSA BSI treated with VAN for ≥ 72 hours. VAN/CFZ was defined as VAN + CFZ within ≤ 72 hours of index culture for ≥ 24 hours. Other β-lactams were allowed for < 48 h in the VAN/CFZ group. The VAN alone group could not have other β-lactams within 7 days of treatment initiation. The primary outcome was clinical failure defined as a composite of 30-d all-cause mortality, 60-day recurrence, and persistent BSI (≥ 7 days). The independent effect of VAN/CFZ on clinical failure was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. The primary safety endpoint was nephrotoxicity within 7 days of treatment initiation. Results A total of 237 patients were included (104 VAN/CFZ, 133 VAN). The most common BSI sources were skin/soft tissue (29.1%), IV catheter (21.9%), osteoarticular (20.3%) and infective endocarditis (16.0%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups except VAN/CFZ had a higher median APACHE II score (18 vs. 13, P = 0.011). VAN/CFZ patients were also more likely to have received an infectious disease consult (100% vs. 81.2%, P < 0.001). Median (IQR) duration of CFZ was 115 (87–164) hours. After controlling for age, APACHE II score, ID consult and infection source, VAN/CFZ was associated with reduced odds of clinical failure (aOR 0.425, 95% CI 0.228, 0.792). Bivariate outcomes are shown in the table: Conclusion Patients with MRSA BSI treated with VAN/CFZ vs. VAN experienced fewer clinical failures, supporting additional studies evaluating the role of adjuvant CFZ for MRSA BSI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 4581-4588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol L. Moore ◽  
Mei Lu ◽  
Faiqa Cheema ◽  
Paola Osaki-Kiyan ◽  
Mary Beth Perri ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMethicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) is a common cause of bloodstream infection (BSI) and is often associated with invasive infections and high rates of mortality. Vancomycin has remained the mainstay of therapy for serious Gram-positive infections, particularly MRSA BSI; however, therapeutic failures with vancomycin have been increasingly reported. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the factors (patient, strain, infection, and treatment) involved in the etiology and management of MRSA BSI to create a risk stratification tool for clinicians. This study included consecutive patients with MRSA BSI treated with vancomycin over 2 years in an inner-city hospital in Detroit, MI. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used to develop a risk prediction model that characterized vancomycin-treated patients at high risk of clinical failure. Of all factors, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score, with a cutoff point of 14, was found to be the strongest predictor of failure and was used to split the population into two groups. Forty-seven percent of the population had an APACHE-II score < 14, a value that was associated with low rates of clinical failure (11%) and mortality (4%). Fifty-four percent of the population had an APACHE-II score ≥ 14, which was associated with high rates of clinical failure (35%) and mortality (23%). The risk stratification model identified the interplay of three other predictors of failure, including the vancomycin MIC as determined by Vitek 2 analysis, the risk level of the source of BSI, and the USA300 strain type. This model can be a useful tool for clinicians to predict the likelihood of success or failure in vancomycin-treated patients with MRSA bloodstream infection.


Author(s):  
Sara Alosaimy ◽  
Abdalhamid M Lagnf ◽  
Taylor Morrisette ◽  
Sarah C J Jorgensen ◽  
Trang D Trinh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) management remains challenging for clinicians. Numerous in vitro studies report synergy when vancomycin (VAN)/daptomycin (DAP) were combined with beta-lactams (BL), which has led to clinical implementation of these combinations. While shorter durations of bacteremia have often been reported, there has been no significant impact on mortality. Methods The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) developed and implemented a clinical pathway algorithm for MRSA BSI treatment in 2016 that included the early use of BL combination therapy with standard-of-care (VAN or DAP) and a mandatory infectious diseases consultation. This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study at the DMC between 2013-2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between pathway implementation and 30-day mortality while adjusting for confounding variables. Results Overall, 813 adult patients treated for MRSA BSI were evaluated. Compared to pre-pathway (PRE) patients (n=379), those treated post-pathway (POST) (n=434) had a significant reduction in 30-day and 90-day mortality; 9.7% in POST vs. 15.6% in PRE (p=0.011) and 12.2% in POST vs. 19.0% in PRE (p=0.007), respectively. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in the PRE compared to POST; 9.6% vs. 7.2% (p=0.282), respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables including infectious diseases consult, POST was independently associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.608; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.375-0.986). Conclusions Implementation of a MRSA BSI treatment pathway with early use of BL reduced mortality with no increased in AKI. Further prospective evaluation of this pathway approach is warranted.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1998-2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Estes ◽  
J. Theusch ◽  
A. Beck ◽  
D. Pitrak ◽  
Kathleen M. Mullane

ABSTRACTCentral venous catheters commonly develop central line-associated bloodstream infections.In vitroantibiotic lock therapy (ALT) was simulated on 10 methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) clinical isolates imbedded in biofilm-coated silicon disks. Five days of 4-h daily exposures to daptomycin (2.5 mg/ml) in 25% ethanol or minocycline (3 mg/ml) plus 25% ethanol and 30 mg/ml EDTA resulted in significantly greater elimination of MRSA colonization than treatment with minocycline alone.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1014
Author(s):  
Alberto Enrico Maraolo ◽  
Agnese Giaccone ◽  
Ivan Gentile ◽  
Annalisa Saracino ◽  
Davide Fiore Bavaro

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important cause of invasive infections, mainly bloodstream infections (BSI) with or without endocarditis. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare vancomycin, the mainstay treatment, with daptomycin as therapeutic options in this context. Materials: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database were searched from their inception to 15 February 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, infection recurrence, persistence of infection, length-of-stay, antibiotic discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and 30-day re-admission. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020169413. Results: Eight studies (1226 patients, 554 vs. 672 in daptomycin vs. vancomycin, respectively) were included. No significant difference in terms of overall mortality was observed [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.33, I2 = 67%]. Daptomycin was associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical failure (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.89, I2 = 60%), as confirmed by pooling adjusted effect sizes (adjusted OR against the use of vancomycin 1.94, 95%CI 1.33–1.82, I2 = 41%), and was linked with fewer treatment-limiting AEs (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.06–0.36, I2 = 19%). No difference emerged between the two treatments as secondary outcomes. Results were not robust to unmeasured confounding (E-value lower than 95% CI 1.00 for all-cause mortality). Conclusions: Against MRSA BSI, with or without endocarditis, daptomycin seems to be associated with a lower risk of clinical failure and treatment-limiting AEs compared with vancomycin. Further studies are needed to better characterize the differences between the two drugs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Jones ◽  
Ramy H. Elshaboury ◽  
Erik Munson ◽  
Thomas J. Dilworth

ABSTRACT mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus isolates phenotypically susceptible to cefoxitin (mecA-methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA]) have been identified. We describe the treatment and outcomes among patients with mecA-MSSA bloodstream infections (BSI) and MRSA BSI matched 1:1 for age, BSI origin, and BSI type (n = 17 per group). Compared to MRSA BSI patients, mecA-MSSA BSI patients more often experienced clinical failure (58.8% and 11.8%, P = 0.010), driven largely by persistent bacteremia (35.3% and 11.8%). mecA-MSSA BSI patients may be at higher risk for poor clinical outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S582-S582
Author(s):  
Sara Alosaimy ◽  
Sarah C J Jorgensen ◽  
Abdulhamid Lagnf ◽  
Evan J Zasowski ◽  
Trang D Trinh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Persistent Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. Vancomycin (VAN) remains the treatment of choice for invasive MRSA BSI. Current guidelines for the treatment of MRSA BSI recommend a VAN AUC24h/MIC ratio ≥400. The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) implemented an AUC guided dosing strategy. However, data on the association between AUC24h and clinical outcomes in MRSA BSI are limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between VAN AUC24h and persistent bacteremia (PB) among patients with BSI. Methods Multi-center, retrospective cohort study from January 2015 to November 2018. We included adult patients with MRSA bacteremia treated with VAN for which AUC24h monitoring was performed. AUC was measured using 2-level guided dosing. The primary outcome was PB defined as continued positive cultures >72 hours after VAN initiation. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was performed to determine the AUC24h breakpoint (BP) most predictive of PB in the cohort. Mann–Whitney and Fischer exact tests were used for univariate analysis. The independent association between AUC24h, dichotomized at the CART-derived cut-point, was then examined through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results Overall, 137 patients were included. The median age was 59 (18–85) years, 69.3% male, and 75.2% African American predominance. Most common sources of BSI were skin/soft tissue (39.4%), pneumonia (25.5%), and osteoarticular (16.8%). The median APACHE II score was 13 (8–20). Median time to microbiological clearance was 2.5 days (0.5–12). Patients with AUC24h ≤ 406.25 were more likely to have PB compared with those with AUC24h > 406.25 (59.4% and 35.2%, respectively; P = 0.002). After controlling for age, intensive care stay, and concomitant β-lactam therapy; AUC of ≤ 406.25 (aOR 2.767, 95% CI 1.212–6.318) and endocarditis (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.079–7.638) were independently associated with PB. Conclusion VAN AUC24h BP of <406.25 was independently associated with PB in patients with MRSA BSI. Our findings underscore the importance of VAN dose optimization to achieve timely bacterial clearance in MRSA bacteremia. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document