scholarly journals Community-Onset Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients in The Netherlands

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
M J T Crobach ◽  
D W Notermans ◽  
C Harmanus ◽  
I M J G Sanders ◽  
S C De Greeff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Reference Laboratory ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Surveillance Programs ◽  
Outpatient Settings ◽  
Community Onset

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is increasingly reported in the community. The aim of this study was to analyze characteristics of hospitalized patients with community-onset CDI (CO-CDI). Methods In the Netherlands, 24 hospitals (university-affiliated and general hospitals) participate in the sentinel CDI surveillance program. Clinical characteristics and 30-day outcomes of hospitalized patients >2 years old diagnosed with CDI are registered. Samples of these patients are sent to the national reference laboratory for polymerase chain reaction ribotyping. Data obtained for this surveillance from May 2012 to May 2018 were used to compare CO-CDI with hospital-onset (HO)-CDI episodes. Results Of 5405 registered cases, 2834 (52.4%) were reported as HO-CDI, 2174 (40.2%) were CO-CDI, and 339 (6.3%) had onset of symptoms in another healthcare facility (eg, nursing home). The proportion of CO-CDI increased over the years and was lower during winter months. Hospitalized patients with CO-CDI were younger (63.8 vs 68.0 years, P < .001) and more often females (53.0% vs 49.6%, P = .02) than patients with HO-CDI. Median time between onset of symptoms and CDI testing was longer in CO-CDI (4 vs 1 day, P < .001). Similar ribotypes were found in CO-CDI and HO-CDI, but ribotype 001 was more frequent among HO-CDI, whereas ribotype 023 was more frequent in CO-CDI. Six of 7 (85.7%) surgeries due to CDI, 27 of 50 (54%) ICU admissions due to CDI, and 48 of 107 (44.9%) of CDI-associated deaths were attributable to CO-CDI. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that patients hospitalized with CO-CDI contribute substantially to the total number of CDI episodes and CDI-associated complications in hospitals, stressing the need for awareness and early testing for CDI in community and outpatient settings and also in patients admitted from community with diarrhoea. Surveillance programs that also target nonhospitalized CDI patients are needed to understand the true burden and dynamics of CDI.

scholarly journals 752. Costs Attributable to Clostridioides difficile Infection in the Presence of Differential Mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S473-S474
Author(s):  
John Sahrmann ◽  
Dustin Stwalley ◽  
Margaret A Olsen ◽  
Holly Yu ◽  
Erik R Dubberke
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Differential Mortality ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Cost Estimates ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Parametric Survival Model ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Community Onset

Abstract Background CDI imposes a major burden on the U.S. healthcare system. Obtaining accurate estimates of economic costs is critical to determining the cost-effectiveness of preventive measures. This task is complicated by differences in epidemiology, mortality, and baseline health status of infected and uninfected individuals, and by the statistical properties of costs data (e.g., right-skewed, excess of zeros costs). Methods Incident CDI cases were identified from Medicare 5% fee-for-service data between 2011 and 2017 and classified into standard surveillance definitions: hospital-onset (HO); other healthcare facility-onset (OHFO); community-onset, healthcare-associated (CO-HCFA); or community-associated (CA). Cases were frequency matched 1:4 to uninfected controls based on age, sex, and year of CDI. Controls were assigned to surveillance definitions based on location at index dates. Medicare allowed costs were summed in 30-day intervals up to 3 years following index. One- and 3-year cumulative costs attributable to CDI were computed using a 3-part estimator consisting of a parametric survival model and a pair of 2-part models predicting costs separately in intervals where death did and did not occur, adjusting for underlying acute and chronic conditions. Results 60,492 CDI cases (Figure 1) were matched to 241,968 controls. Three-year mortality was higher among CDI cases compared to matched controls for HO (45% vs 26%) and OHFO (42% vs 36%), whereas mortality was slightly lower for CDI cases compared to controls for those with community onset (CO-HCFA: 28% vs 32%; CA: 10% vs 11%). One- and 3-year attributable costs due to CDI are shown in Figure 2. Adjusted 1-year attributable costs amounted to &26,954 (95% CI: &26,154–&27,939) for HO; &10,539 (&9,564–&11,518) for OHFO; &6,525 (&5,012–&8,171) for CO-HCFA; and &3,171 (&1,841–&4,200) for CA. Adjusted 3-year attributable costs were &44,736 (&43,063–&46,483) for HO; &13,994 (&12,529–&15,975) for OHFO; &7,349 (&4,738–&10,246) for CO-HCFA; and &2,377 (&166–&4,722) for CA. Figure 1. Proportion of Cases by CDI Surveillance Definitions Abbreviations: HO: hospital-onset; OHFO: other healthcare facility-onset; CO-HCFA: community-onset, healthcare-associated; CA: community-associated. Figure 2. Estimates of Costs Attributable to CDI by CDI Surveillance Definitions at One and Three Years after Onset Top panels: One-year cost estimates. Bottom panels: Three-year cost estimates. Abbreviations: HO: hospital-onset; OHFO: other healthcare facility-onset; CO-HCFA:community-onset, healthcare-associated; CA:community-associated. Conclusion CDI was associated with increased healthcare costs across surveillance definitions in Medicare fee-for-service patients after adjusting for survival and underlying conditions. Disclosures Dustin Stwalley, MA, AbbVie Inc (Shareholder)Bristol-Myers Squibb (Shareholder) Margaret A. Olsen, PhD, MPH, Pfizer (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Holly Yu, MSPH, Pfizer (Employee) Erik R. Dubberke, MD, MSPH, Ferring (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Seres (Consultant)Summit (Consultant)

scholarly journals 780. How Much Does Prior Hospitalization Contribute to Readmission with Community-onset Clostridioides difficile Infection?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S434-S435
Author(s):  
Alice Guh ◽  
Lauren C Korhonen ◽  
Lisa Gail Winston ◽  
Brittany Martin ◽  
Helen Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Care Facility ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Emerging Infections ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Community Onset

Abstract Background Interventions to reduce community-onset (CO) Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) are not usually hospital-based due to the perception that they are often acquired outside the hospital. We determined the proportion of admitted CO CDI that might be associated with previous hospitalization. Methods The CDC’s Emerging Infections Program conducts population-based CDI surveillance in 10 US sites. We defined an incident case as a C. difficile-positive stool collected in 2017 from a person aged ≥ 1 year admitted to a hospital with no positive tests in the prior 8 weeks. Cases were defined as CO if stool was collected within 3 days of hospitalization. CO cases were classified into four categories: long-term care facility (LTCF)-onset if patient was admitted from an LTCF; long-term acute care hospital (LTACH)-onset if patient was admitted from an LTACH; CO-healthcare-facility associated (CO-HCFA) if patient was admitted from a private residence but had a prior healthcare-facility admission in the past 12 weeks; or community-associated (CA) if there was no admission to a healthcare facility in the prior 12 weeks. We excluded hospitals with < 10 cases among admitted catchment-area residents. Results Of 4724 cases in 86 hospitals, 2984 (63.2%) were CO (median per hospital: 65.8%; interquartile range [IQR]: 58.3%-70.7%). Among the CO cases, 1424 (47.7%) were CA (median per hospital: 48.1%; IQR: 40.3%-57.7%), 1201 (40.3%) were CO-HCFA (median per hospital: 41.0%; IQR: 32.9%-47.8%), 350 (11.7%) were LTCF-onset (median per hospital: 10.0%; IQR: 0.6%-14.4%), and 9 (0.3%) were LTACH-onset. Of 1201 CO-HCFA cases, 1174 (97.8%) had a prior hospitalization; among these, 978 (83.3%) (median per hospital: 83.3%; IQR: 69.2%-90.6%), which consists of 32.8% of all hospitalized CO cases, had been discharged from the same hospital (Figure), and 84.4% of the 978 cases (median per hospital: 88.2%: IQR: 76.5%-100.0%) had received antibiotics sometime in the prior 12 weeks. Figure. Frequency of Cases Discharged in the 12 Weeks Prior to Readmission with Clostridioides difficile Infection (N=1138*) Conclusion A third of hospitalized CO CDI had been recently discharged from the same hospital, and most had received antibiotics during or soon after the last admission. Hospital-based and post-discharge antibiotic stewardship interventions could help reduce subsequent CDI hospitalizations. Disclosures Ghinwa Dumyati, MD, Roche Diagnostics (Consultant)

scholarly journals 2416. Effect of Sequential Universal Bleach Cleaning and Best Practice Alerts on Clostridioides difficile Infection Rates

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S834-S834
Author(s):  
Kari Gand ◽  
Derrek Helmin ◽  
Shawnda Johnson ◽  
Susan E Kline ◽  
Alison Galdys
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Community Onset

Abstract Background A gap analysis prompted consideration of expanded bleach disinfection beyond rooms housing patients in isolation for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and emphasis on CD testing stewardship at the University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC), a tertiary care center spanning two campuses in close proximity with adult patients on the East Bank (EB), adult and pediatric patients on West Bank (WB). Methods An electronic best practice advisory (BPA) went live in April 2018 on both the EB and WB (Figure 1). The BPA first discourages CD testing in the event of a prior positive within 10 days or a prior negative within 7 days. Second, the BPA discourages CD testing in patients with fewer than 3 loose stools in a 24 hour period, who have received laxatives in the last 48 hours, or who lack CDI symptoms (fever > 38C, abdominal pain, or leukocytosis > 11,000). Providers can bypass the BPA based on clinical judgment; those who override the BPA are provided just-in-time education via email. Following a successful pilot in three wards, the EB Environmental Services (ES) team expanded the use of bleach to include all terminal cleaning regardless of isolation status in June 2018 (Figure 1). Daily cleaning on the EB was excluded from universal bleach utilization, as were daily and terminal cleaning on the WB. CD testing throughout the study period occurred via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the toxin B gene. ES performance, assessed by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence testing, and hand hygiene rates were unchanged throughout the study period. Results Adult-only hospital-onset (HO)-CDI rates decreased during the study period on both hospital campuses, with the EB exhibiting a greater decrease, (Fig 1), while community-onset (CO) and community-onset healthcare facility associated (CO-HCFA) rates remained steady during the study period (Fig 3). Whole-house (adult and pediatric) CD testing was largely unchanged while the proportion of tests triggering the BPA decreased (Fig 2). Conclusion Universal bleach utilization during terminal cleaning combined with an electronic BPA were associated with decreased adult HO-CDI rates. However, the BPA did not impact CD testing rates, suggesting that decreased HO-CDI rates may be unattributable to testing stewardship. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Analysis of National Healthcare Safety Network Clostridioides difficile Infection Standardized Infection Ratio by Test Type

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s116-s118
Author(s):  
Qunna Li ◽  
Andrea Benin ◽  
Alice Guh ◽  
Margaret A. Dudeck ◽  
Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Adjustment ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Directional Pattern ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Test Type ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Background: The NHSN has used positive laboratory tests for surveillance of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) LabID events since 2009. Typically, CDIs are detected using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), or various test combinations. The NHSN uses a risk-adjusted, standardized infection ratio (SIR) to assess healthcare facility-onset (HO) CDI. Despite including test type in the risk adjustment, some hospital personnel and other stakeholders are concerned that NAAT use is associated with higher SIRs than are EIAs. To investigate this issue, we analyzed NHSN data from acute-care hospitals for July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. Methods: Calendar quarters for which CDI test type was reported as NAAT (includes NAAT, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)+NAAT and GDH+EIA followed by NAAT if discrepant) or EIA (includes EIA and GDH+EIA) were selected. HO CDI SIRs were calculated for facility-wide inpatient locations. We conducted the following analyses: (1) Among hospitals that did not switch their test type, we compared the distribution of HO incident rates and SIRs by those reporting NAAT vs EIA. (2) Among hospitals that switched their test type, we selected quarters with a stable switch pattern of 2 consecutive quarters of each of EIA and NAAT (categorized as pattern EIA-to-NAAT or NAAT-to-EIA). Pooled semiannual SIRs for EIA and NAAT were calculated, and a paired t test was used to evaluate the difference of SIRs by switch pattern. Results: Most hospitals did not switch test types (3,242, 89%), and 2,872 (89%) reported sufficient data to calculate SIRs, with 2,444 (85%) using NAAT. The crude pooled HO CDI incidence rates for hospitals using EIA clustered at the lower end of the histogram versus rates for NAAT (Fig. 1). The SIR distributions of both NAAT and EIA overlapped substantially and covered a similar range of SIR values (Fig. 1). Among hospitals with a switch pattern, hospitals were equally likely to have an increase or decrease in their SIR (Fig. 2). The mean SIR difference for the 42 hospitals switching from EIA to NAAT was 0.048 (95% CI, −0.189 to 0.284; P = .688). The mean SIR difference for the 26 hospitals switching from NAAT to EIA was 0.162 (95% CI, −0.048 to 0.371; P = .124). Conclusions: The pattern of SIR distributions of both NAAT and EIA substantiate the soundness of NHSN risk adjustment for CDI test types. Switching test type did not produce a consistent directional pattern in SIR that was statistically significant.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None

scholarly journals Assessment of Testing and Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Initiated in the Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A Petty ◽  
Valerie M Vaughn ◽  
Scott A Flanders ◽  
Twisha Patel ◽  
Anurag N Malani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Altered Mental Status ◽  
Estimating Equation ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background Reducing antibiotic use in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) has been inpatient focused. However, testing and treatment is often started in the emergency department (ED). Thus, for hospitalized patients with ASB, we sought to identify patterns of testing and treatment initiated by emergency medicine (EM) clinicians and the association of treatment with outcomes. Methods We conducted a 43-hospital, cohort study of adults admitted through the ED with ASB (February 2018–February 2020). Using generalized estimating equation models, we assessed for (1) factors associated with antibiotic treatment by EM clinicians and, after inverse probability of treatment weighting, (2) the effect of treatment on outcomes. Results Of 2461 patients with ASB, 74.4% (N = 1830) received antibiotics. The EM clinicians ordered urine cultures in 80.0% (N = 1970) of patients and initiated treatment in 68.5% (1253 of 1830). Predictors of EM clinician treatment of ASB versus no treatment included dementia, spinal cord injury, incontinence, urinary catheter, altered mental status, leukocytosis, and abnormal urinalysis. Once initiated by EM clinicians, 79% (993 of 1253) of patients remained on antibiotics for at least 3 days. Antibiotic treatment was associated with a longer length of hospitalization (mean 5.1 vs 4.2 days; relative risk = 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.23) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) (0.9% [N = 11] vs 0% [N = 0]; P = .02). Conclusions Among hospitalized patients ultimately diagnosed with ASB, EM clinicians commonly initiated testing and treatment; most antibiotics were continued by inpatient clinicians. Antibiotic treatment was not associated with improved outcomes, whereas it was associated with prolonged hospitalization and CDI. For best impact, stewardship interventions must expand to the ED.

Burden and risk factors for inappropriate Clostridioides Difficile infection testing among hospitalized patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 115283
Author(s):  
Ellen Axenfeld ◽  
William G. Greendyke ◽  
Jianhua Li ◽  
Daniel A. Green ◽  
Susan Whittier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Using diagnostic stewardship to reduce rates, healthcare expenditures and accurately identify cases of hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Dipesh Solanky ◽  
Derek K. Juang ◽  
Scott T. Johns ◽  
Ian C. Drobish ◽  
Sanjay R. Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infection ◽  
Laxative Use ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Hospital Days

AbstractObjective:Lack of judicious testing can result in the incorrect diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), unnecessary CDI treatment, increased costs and falsely augmented hospital-acquired infection (HAI) rates. We evaluated facility-wide interventions used at the VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS) to reduce healthcare-onset, healthcare-facility–associated CDI (HO-HCFA CDI), including the use of diagnostic stewardship with test ordering criteria.Design:We conducted a retrospective study to assess the effectiveness of measures implemented to reduce the rate of HO-HCFA CDI at the VASDHS from fiscal year (FY)2015 to FY2018.Interventions:Measures executed in a stepwise fashion included a hand hygiene initiative, prompt isolation of CDI patients, enhanced terminal room cleaning, reduction of fluoroquinolone and proton-pump inhibitor use, laboratory rejection of solid stool samples, and lastly diagnostic stewardship with C. difficile toxin B gene nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) criteria instituted in FY2018.Results:From FY2015 to FY2018, 127 cases of HO-HCFA CDI were identified. All rate-reducing initiatives resulted in decreased HO-HCFA cases (from 44 to 13; P ≤ .05). However, the number of HO-HCFA cases (34 to 13; P ≤ .05), potential false-positive testing associated with colonization and laxative use (from 11 to 4), hospital days (from 596 to 332), CDI-related hospitalization costs (from $2,780,681 to $1,534,190) and treatment cost (from $7,158 vs $1,476) decreased substantially following the introduction of diagnostic stewardship with test criteria from FY2017 to FY2018.Conclusions:Initiatives to decrease risk for CDI and diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile stool NAAT significantly reduced HO-HCFA CDI rates, detection of potential false-positives associated with laxative use, and lowered healthcare costs. Diagnostic stewardship itself had the most dramatic impact on outcomes observed and served as an effective tool in reducing HO-HCFA CDI rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document