scholarly journals Metastatic spinal cord compression by gastric cancer: a case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teiko Kawahigashi ◽  
Takashi Kawabe ◽  
Hirokazu Iijima ◽  
Yuto Igarashi ◽  
Yuma Suno ◽  
...  

Abstract Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is one of the serious complications of malignancy. Most cases of MSCC occur from breast or prostate cancer primaries; MSCC secondary to gastric cancer is rare. We herein report a case of a patient with gastric cancer with weakness of the lower limbs and urinary retention on initial presentation. This case demonstrates that although rare, bone metastases and MSCC may occur from gastric primaries. It also highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and early treatment of MSCC.

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1174
Author(s):  
Sungwoo Hong ◽  
Dalsan You ◽  
In Gab Jeong ◽  
Jun Hyuk Hong ◽  
Hanjong Ahn ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sead Crnalic ◽  
Christer Hildingsson ◽  
Pernilla Wikström ◽  
Anders Bergh ◽  
Richard Löfvenberg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhide Miyoshi ◽  
Takashi Kawahara ◽  
Masahiro Yao ◽  
Hiroji Uemura

Abstract Background Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) from prostate cancer (PC) influences not only patients’ prognosis but also their quality of life. However, little is known about the clinical outcome of surgery for MSCC from PC. We evaluated both the oncological and functional outcomes of decompression and reconstruction surgery for patients with symptomatic MSCC from PC. Methods We assessed 19 patients who underwent decompression and reconstruction surgery for symptomatic MSCC from PC. Of these 19 patients, 8 had metastatic hormone-naïve PC (mHNPC) and 11 had metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). Results The median age of the patients with mHNPC and mCRPC was 72 and 65 years, respectively. The median prostate-specific antigen level at the time of diagnosis of MSCC in patients with mHNPC and mCRPC was 910 and 67 ng/mL, respectively. Although two of eight patients (25.0%) with mHNPC were ambulatory preoperatively, six patients (75.0%) were ambulatory postoperatively. Among 11 patients with mCRPC, only 3 (27.3%) were ambulatory preoperatively, while 6 (54.5%) were ambulatory postoperatively. The median postoperative overall survival among patients with mHNPC and mCRPC were not reached and 8 months, respectively. Conclusions Decompression and reconstruction surgery for symptomatic MSCC from PC might contribute to a favorable functional outcome among men with mHNPC and mCRPC. However, its role in improving the oncological outcome remains unclear. The treatment strategy should be chosen by shared decision-making among patients, urologists, radiation oncologists, and orthopedic surgeons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document