The “Crucifixion” of “Anyone’s Gay Son”: Matthew Shepard

2019 ◽  
pp. 47-84
Author(s):  
Brett Krutzsch

Chapter 2 investigates why Matthew Shepard’s death evoked outrage throughout the United States, especially from heterosexuals who had been unmoved by the vast number of gay and bisexual AIDS deaths. In particular, chapter 2 illuminates several ways that secular gay activists used Christian rhetoric to promote social acceptance. Gay activists commonly presented Shepard as a practicing Protestant who lived, suffered, and died in ways analogous to Jesus. In so doing, gay activists exalted Shepard as a more legitimate Christian than those in the Christian right. Ultimately, the chapter makes evident how Christian ideals shaped secular gay activists’ strategies for assimilation at the end of the twentieth and start of the twenty-first centuries.

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua G. Rosenberger ◽  
Vanessa Schick ◽  
Debby Herbenick ◽  
David S. Novak ◽  
Michael Reece

Author(s):  
Todd M. Endelman

This chapter refers to the emancipation and enlightenment that failed to uproot hoary views about Jewish otherness nor erase the stigma of Jewishness in an era of unconditional social acceptance. It talks about how Jews became 'less Jewish' when antisemitism persisted and, in some contexts, worsened. It also explains how the enlightenment and scientific and industrial revolutions undermined the doctrinal foundations of Christianity, which initiated the tradition of viewing Jews as demonic outsiders and did not eliminate the stigma attached to Jewishness. The chapter explores the perception that Jews were different in kind from non-Jews that was too rooted in Western culture and sentiment to disappear when the religious doctrines that had engendered it in the first place weakened. It then describes Jews in liberal states like Britain, France, and the United States, who found being Jewish problematic to one degree or another.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 100505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Martos ◽  
Adam Fingerhut ◽  
Patrick A. Wilson ◽  
Ilan H. Meyer

Author(s):  
Denise Bielby ◽  
Kristen Bryant

Television was introduced as an experimental technology in the 1920s and 1930s in Europe, Asia, the former Soviet Union, and the Americas, but it was not until after World War II that it was widely adopted as a form of mass communication around the globe. Although television’s innovation and diffusion as a novel technology, establishment and growth as a communications industry, maturation and popularity, and specialization and diversification took decades to unfold, once it became widely publicly available, it quickly materialized as an essential venue for news, information, and entertainment. Television originated as a domestic industry overseen through a variety of national regulatory arrangements, making its transformation from a medium focused on local interests and concerns into an industry with a global reach all the more compelling. This transformation, which was enhanced by the introduction of cable, satellite, and Internet technology, was, in retrospect, influenced by the accomplishments of radio broadcasting, with its ability to transcend national borders and reach unanticipated audiences, and the expansiveness of the film industry, which from the earliest days of the studio system had cultivated an international export market to enhance revenue. In the case of the television industry, export was led by production companies seeking to recoup the costs of production under deficit financing arrangements with the networks and program sponsors. Early global exports were driven mainly by US production companies, and although the United States remains dominant in the sale of finished products, a vast number of nations, production companies, and networks now provide the United States with stiff competition within regional markets and program genres. Deficit financing has been adopted more recently by wealthier non-US nations like the United Kingdom, while less affluent and/or smaller markets rely on other approaches. Ever-emerging technologies, penetrable national borders, remote markets, and viewer interest in programs from other countries are foundational concerns alongside the political economy of regulation that make up the study of the global television industry.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naim Kapucu, PhD ◽  
Brittany Haupt, MEd ◽  
Murat Yuksel, PhD

With the vast number of fragmented, independent public safety wireless communication systems, the United States is encountering major challenges with enhancing interoperability and effectively managing costs while sharing limited availability of critical spectrum. The traditional hierarchical approach of emergency management does not always allow for needed flexibility and is not a mandate. A national system would reduce equipment needs, increase effectiveness, and enrich quality and coordination of response; however, it is dependent on integrating the commercial market. This article discusses components of an ideal national wireless public safety system consists along with key policies in regulating wireless communication and spectrum sharing for public safety and challenges for implementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document