Organizational Effects of Intellectual Property (Macro Level)

Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Barnett

This chapter describes how the level of IP protection impacts firms’ choices in organizing the innovation and commercialization process, which in turn influences the structure of the innovation market as a whole. Weak-IP regimes induce firms to adopt “hierarchical” structures that mitigate expropriation risk by locating innovation and commercialization activities within substantially integrated supply chains. Strong-IP regimes restore organizational choice and enable innovators to adopt “entrepreneurial” structures that rely on contractual relationships among firms that specialize in particular innovation or commercialization functions. If hierarchical structures cannot sufficiently mitigate expropriation risk, then innovation markets will adopt “bureaucratic” structures that rely on tax-based or philanthropic funding. Even when markets adapt to weak-IP regimes by adopting hierarchical structures, or hybrid hierarchical and semi-bureaucratic structures, that support robust R&D investment, efficiency losses will arise to the extent that entry by entrepreneurial innovators is suppressed and the selected mix of innovation projects is distorted.

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunjia Han ◽  
Stephen Rhys Thomas ◽  
Mu Yang ◽  
Petros Ieromonachou ◽  
Hongru Zhang

Author(s):  
María del Socorro López Gómez ◽  
James Alberto Morales Chincha ◽  
José Edinson Aedo-Cobo

Author(s):  
Roman Denysenko

Keywords: subjects of contractual relationships, work-for-hire intellectual propertyassets, author, employer, property rights for work-for-hire intellectual property assets,consideration The article analyzes the legal regime of official works createdduring the performance of the contract for the performance of research or researchand development and technological work. It is proved that the subjects of contractualrelations in addition to the executor and the customer should also include the creator(author, inventor) — an employee working in a scientific institution or enterprise,whose creative work created an official object of intellectual property. At the sametime, a scientific institution (enterprise) that has hired an employee under an employmentagreement (contract) acts as an employer. Based on the analysis of the legislationin the field of intellectual property and scientific sources, the author identifiesthe features of intellectual property. The meaning of the terms «duties» and «employer's order» is investigated. It is stated that there is no definition in the legislation ofUkraine of the term «official task» and requirements for registration of official taskfor the creation of a work. The grounds for recognizing the objects of intellectual propertyrights as official are determined and analyzed. The peculiarities of the distributionof property rights to official objects between the customer, the executor and theemployee-author in the context of the legal relations that arise and accompany theperformance of contracts are considered. Various contractual constructions used inthe mechanism of division of property rights into official objects are analyzed. Proposalsare formulated aimed at improving the local regulation of the distribution of propertyrights to service facilities. Particular attention in the article is paid to the issue ofpayment of remuneration to the author of the official object. The structure of such remunerationis analyzed, sources of its payment are offered, terms of payment of suchremuneration and their legal definition. It is proposed that the contracts provide forobligations (guarantees) of the parties to «finance» the customer and pay the contractorremuneration to the author for the creation and use of the official object.


Author(s):  
Osbaldo Turpo-Gebera ◽  
César H. Limaymanta ◽  
Elías Sanz-Casado

This article analyzes the scientific and innovative activity of Peru in relation to its South American peers. For this purpose, indicators of investment in R&D, publications, patents, collaboration, impact and the relationship between some of them were defined. The data were retrieved from Scopus, SciVal, World Bank and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The study showed that both the R&D investment and scientific and technological production in Peru are lower than in other South American countries. Peru ranks fifth in South America in international collaboration (60.1%), and a similar trend is seen in impact and performance. All the countries in the study show increases in publications in Q1 journals, according to the SJR. Among the conclusions, it is worth highlighting the low investment in R&D in most of the countries in the region (below 0.6% of GDP), as well as the high technological dependence and the important role of universities as a driving force for research. Resumen Se analiza la actividad científica e innovadora de Perú en relación con sus pares sudamericanos. Para ello, se definieron los indicadores de inversión en I+D, de publicaciones, patentes, colaboración, impacto y la relación entre algunos de ellos. Los datos se recuperaron de Scopus, SciVal, Banco Mundial y World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). El estudio evidenció que tanto la inversión en I+D como la producción científica y tecnológica de Perú presenta valores inferiores a otros países sudamericanos. Perú ocupa el quinto lugar de Sudamérica en colaboración internacional (60,1%), una tendencia similar se presenta en el impacto y rendimiento. Todos los países del estudio presentan incrementos de publicaciones en revistas Q1, según el SJR. Entre las conclusiones hay que resaltar la escasa inversión en I+D de la mayoría de los países de la región (por debajo del 0,6% del PIB), así como la gran dependencia tecnológica, y el importante rol de las universidades como motor de la investigación.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document