ADR’s Place at the Justice Table
As alternative dispute resolution (ADR) innovations become institutionalized into the court system, ADR’s promise to humanize and personalize justice too often becomes co-opted by the more dominant values of the traditional legal system. Professor Menkel-Meadow refers to this co-opting as a “clash of two cultures.” This “clash” is actually the legal system’s ongoing acculturation of ADR, focusing on efficiency and settlement often at the expense of preserving the distinct qualitative benefits such innovations offer the justice system. Why does this co-opting happen? From a sociological perspective, it can also be understood to be an extension of the ongoing feminist struggle to gain voice and legitimacy within the legal system and within broader society. This comment invites the reader to re-examine the institutionalization of ADR innovations through this acculturation lens. Although the focus will be on the institutionalization of court annexed mediation programs, these lessons have broad applicability to many court annexed ADR innovations....