The Bell of Görgülü Cannot Be Unrung—Can It?
This chapter traces the diffusion of constitutional resistance against the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) that the German Federal Constitutional Court initiated with its Görgülü judgment. Based on a comparative overview of the most significant instances of Görgülü-inspired resistance, the chapter makes three important points. First, pertaining to the study of legal borrowing, it demonstrates that not only good but also bad ideas travel, with the risk of becoming worse along the way. Second, relating to the empirically observable spread of Görgülü-like resistance, the chapter shows that a spirit of sovereigntist constitutional supremacy lurks unpredictably over the ECHR system today. Third, it suggests that this legal thinking may set a spiral in motion capable of seriously undermining the sentiment of “shared responsibility” so much needed for a thriving Europe of rights. The chapter concludes that all actors in this transnational process of contestation over the relationship between constitutional values and European human rights should tread with great care.