Two Definitions of Artistic Value
This chapter compares two definitions of artistic value that accommodate its second order, pluralistic nature. The first, the composite view, defines this value in terms of the evolving functions of central art forms. The second, the buck-passing view, defines artistic value in terms of art forms (‘arts’) but instead of doing so by appealing the functions of artworks, it does so more directly in terms of ‘value of work as a k,’ for example, value of a work as a painting. The chapter argues that the chief objections to each definition can be answered. It concludes by assessing the comparative strengths and liabilities of each approach, but the main message is that there are multiple resources for sustaining a pluralistic approach to artistic value.