The Epistemology of Prejudice Maintenance
But what about prejudice maintenance? Questions of acquisition aside, how could anyone be epistemically rational in retaining their prejudiced belief over time in the face of the significant amounts of contrary evidence confronting them in their everyday lives? This chapter argues that much of this evidence can be easily absorbed by prejudiced believers, in keeping with our best canons of epistemic rationality. Drawing on recent work on generic generalizations, the chapter argues that prejudiced beliefs are in no sense falsified by single contrary instances, or even larger swaths of them. Even when subjects are rationally required to recognize instances as providing contrary evidence, the correct response may simply be to reduce one’s credence in the relevant proposition. The result may be that they are somewhat less prejudiced than before. But they are still prejudiced, even as, by hypothesis, they have responded correctly to their evidence.