The Interaction of ‘If’ and ‘Would’

2020 ◽  
pp. 189-213
Author(s):  
Timothy Williamson

The chapter argues that ‘would’ is associated with a suppositional heuristic analogous to that for ‘if’ but sensitive to the contextual restriction on ‘would’. This heuristic has structurally analogous consequences to those for ‘would’; in particular, it generates the appearance that ‘would’ commutes with negation, and correspondingly that counterfactuals obey the principles of Conditional Excluded Middle (CEM) and Conditional Non-Contradiction (CNC). However, to play its central cognitive role properly, ‘would’ must be able to generalize over more than one world at a time, thereby invalidating CEM, which is thus an artefact of the heuristics (as is CNC). Connections between ‘would’, ‘will’, ‘might’, and ‘not’ are explored. In particular, the relation between ‘will’ and ‘would’ corresponds to the relation between online prediction and offline imagination.

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Ilyes Elaissi ◽  
Okba Taouali ◽  
Messaoud Hassani

2015 ◽  
pp. btv439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Dong Xu ◽  
Shao-Ping Shi ◽  
Ping-Ping Wen ◽  
Jian-Ding Qiu

Author(s):  
Marcel Buß

Abstract Immanuel Kant states that indirect arguments are not suitable for the purposes of transcendental philosophy. If he is correct, this affects contemporary versions of transcendental arguments which are often used as an indirect refutation of scepticism. I discuss two reasons for Kant’s rejection of indirect arguments. Firstly, Kant argues that we are prone to misapply the law of excluded middle in philosophical contexts. Secondly, Kant points out that indirect arguments lack some explanatory power. They can show that something is true but they do not provide insight into why something is true. Using mathematical proofs as examples, I show that this is because indirect arguments are non-constructive. From a Kantian point of view, transcendental arguments need to be constructive in some way. In the last part of the paper, I briefly examine a comment made by P. F. Strawson. In my view, this comment also points toward a connection between transcendental and constructive reasoning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document