Membership Eligibility in a Europe of Non-Communist States, 1957–1961

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-136
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Thomas

This chapter uses extensive archival evidence to demonstrate how the European Economic Community’s initial membership norm—that non-Communist states in Europe are eligible for membership—shaped its decisions regarding the quests of Greece, Spain, and Turkey for association agreements that would prepare them to join the new community. Given that the three countries’ economies were relatively under-developed and yet competed with EEC members in key agricultural sectors, the fact that Spain was still in the grip of a fascist leader formerly allied with Adolf Hitler, and the military take-over of Turkey in 1960–61, there was plenty of ground for rejecting their overtures. However, the archival evidence shows how the non-Communist norm framed the decision-making process and stopped member states from blocking the three aspirants.

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elton Akins ◽  
Hank Dodge ◽  
Colleen Duffy ◽  
Brian Gollsneider ◽  
James Imlay

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Paul TUDORACHE

Abstract: The manifestation of different dissensions regarding the use of planning methodologies in the operations process has become a reality, both at national level and within NATO. Therefore, this research paper contributes to the theoretical clarification on defining the specific methodologies, respectively their employment in relation to the level of Land Forces military operations. Another objective of this paper is to make a comparative analysis between the design methodology, military decision making process (MDMP) and troop leading procedures (TLP), targeting the military structures within the Land Forces, and those belonging to NATO. Also, at the end, the paper highlights some perspectives of improving planning, as the primary activity which starts the operations process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-41
Author(s):  
Maciej Zaorski

The implementation of modern tools in the military system constitutes an important step in supporting the decision-making process. The impact of new GIS technologies is important for the assessment of the battlefield . According to assumptions, reconnaissance is a continuous process that crowns the assessment of the opponent and of the battlefield. Site assessment is an element of the command process where the conclusions of the task analysis includes an assessment of the potential opponent together with his modus operandi and an assessment of the environment . As part of the Information Preparation of the Battlefield (hereinafter referred to as IPB), the identification of threats and limitations has an impact on the identification of potential approach routes, traffic corridors and maneuvers in assigned areas and lanes . The end result is the determination of the maneuverability of forces and resources owned or those of the opponent. The information is to relate to the impact of the terrain components on the scope and nature of conducted activities, and the hydrometeorological conditions are to relate to the impact on the terrain, equipment, and people . As far as it regards the analysis of the environment and the opponent, it is possible to apply modern technologies to shorten the time for the analyses performed within the ongoing decision-making process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document