Specific Medical Risks for the Traveller

Author(s):  
Dom Colbert
Keyword(s):  

The next two chapters deal with specific and general medical risks for the traveller. The topics covered are not exhaustive nor are they always exclusive to the traveller. However, they do focus on the problems most likely to be encountered when travelling and, as such, the responsible travel health advisor must be familiar with them.

Author(s):  
Irmgard L. Bauer

AbstractOne-half of all travellers are women; yet, there is a distinct lack of detailed travel health knowledge on topics of unique relevance to women. While there is medical advice relating to stages in the female lifecycle, it neglects women-specific practical aspects despite their ability to harm travellers’ health and cause inconvenience. This paper discusses comprehensively three major aspects of travel as they relate to women. First, it suggests the management of personal hygiene, bodily functions, menstruation and sexual behaviour, and alerts to the limited knowledge on travel mental health issues.Second, apart from travelling in a female body with its specific demands, being a woman requires special attention to safety and security. Within various travel contexts, women have many opportunities for minimising potential risks.Finally, guided by travel medicine’s acknowledgment of its role in the concept of responsible travel, this article goes beyond the usual general statements and broad advice and offers detailed and practical suggestions on how the female traveller can contribute to the overall goal of minimising any potential harm to fellow humans and the natural environment. Recognising the scarcity of women-specific travel information, pathways to better education, and a range of suggestions for urgent research facilitate the provision of high-quality travel health care tailored specifically to women’s needs.


1991 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 315-317
Author(s):  
Bernie Hudson
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Daniels ◽  
Kathy Weingarten

1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay S. Keystone ◽  
Roberta Dismukes ◽  
Lisa Sawyer ◽  
Phyllis E Kozarsky
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 627-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine A. Bradley ◽  
Seeta Badrinath ◽  
Kristen Bush ◽  
Jodie Boyd-Wickizer ◽  
Bradley Anawalt
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-119
Author(s):  
Annelies Wilder-Smith ◽  
Robert Steffen

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e017058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alba Sánchez-Mascuñano ◽  
Cristina Masuet-Aumatell ◽  
Sergio Morchón-Ramos ◽  
Josep M Ramon

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between smoking andaltitude mountain sicknessin a cohort of travellers to 2500 metres above sea level (masl) or higher.SettingTravel Health Clinic at the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, in Barcelona, Spain.ParticipantsA total of 302 adults seeking medical advice at the travel clinic, between July 2012 and August 2014, before travelling to 2500 masl or above, who agreed to participate in the study and to be contacted after the trip were included. Individuals who met the following criteria were excluded: younger than 18 years old, taking carbonic anhydrase inhibitors for chronic use, undergoing treatment with systemic corticosteroids and taking any medication that might prevent or treat altitude mountain sickness (AMS) prior to or during the trip. The majority of participants were women (n=156, 51.7%). The mean age was 37.7 years (SD 12.3). The studied cohort included 74 smokers (24.5%), 158 (52.3%) non-smokers and 70 (23.2%) ex-smokers. No statistical differences were observed between different sociodemographic characteristics, constitutional symptoms or drug use and smoking status.OutcomesThe main outcome was the development of AMS, which was defined according to the Lake Louise AMS criteria.ResultsAMS, according to the Lake Louise score, was significantly lower in smokers; the value was 14.9%, 95% CI (6.8 to 23.0%) in smokers and 29.4%, 95% CI (23.5 to 35.3%) in non-smokers with an adjusted OR of 0.54, 95% CI (0.31 to 0.97) independent of gender, age and maximum altitude reached.ConclusionsThese results suggest that smoking could reduce the risk of AMS in non-acclimated individuals. Further studies should be performed in larger cohorts of travellers to confirm these results. Despite the results, smoking must be strongly discouraged because it greatly increases the risk of cardiorespiratory diseases, cancer and other diseases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document