Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation

Author(s):  
Guglielmo Foffani ◽  
Antonio Oliviero

Focal application of a relatively strong permanent magnet over the human cortex induces neurophysiological and behavioral effects. This discovery led to the inclusion of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) into the family of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques. The safety, simplicity, portability, and low-cost of tSMS make it particularly appealing for possible clinical and research applications. Similarly to all NIBS techniques, we are far from understanding the exact mechanisms by which tSMS produces its effects, but converging evidence suggests that modulation of ionic interchange across the membrane may be responsible for its physiological effects at the cellular level. There are no data yet supporting clear effects of tSMS in clinical applications, but a number of ongoing studies suggest that clinical results will become available soon.

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Oliviero ◽  
M.C. Carrasco-López ◽  
M. Campolo ◽  
Y.A. Perez-Borrego ◽  
V. Soto-León ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 483
Author(s):  
Tatsunori Watanabe ◽  
Nami Kubo ◽  
Xiaoxiao Chen ◽  
Keisuke Yunoki ◽  
Takuya Matsumoto ◽  
...  

The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate whether transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS), which can modulate cortical excitability, would influence inhibitory control function when applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Young healthy adults (n = 8, mean age ± SD = 24.4 ± 4.1, six females) received the following stimulations for 30 min on different days: (1) tSMS over the left DLPFC, (2) tSMS over the right DLPFC, and (3) sham stimulation over either the left or right DLPFC. The participants performed a Go/NoGo task before, immediately after, and 10 min after the stimulation. They were instructed to extend the right wrist in response to target stimuli. We recorded the electromyogram from the right wrist extensor muscles and analyzed erroneous responses (false alarm and missed target detection) and reaction times. As a result, 50% of the participants made erroneous responses, and there were five erroneous responses in total (0.003%). A series of statistical analyses revealed that tSMS did not affect the reaction time. These preliminary findings suggest the possibility that tSMS over the DLPFC is incapable of modulating inhibitory control and/or that the cognitive load imposed in this study was insufficient to detect the effect.


2014 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. S43-S44
Author(s):  
J.J. Gonzalez-Rosa ◽  
V. Soto-Leon ◽  
P. Real-Fernandez ◽  
G. Foffani ◽  
B.A. Strange ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 589 (20) ◽  
pp. 4949-4958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Oliviero ◽  
Laura Mordillo-Mateos ◽  
Pablo Arias ◽  
Ivan Panyavin ◽  
Guglielmo Foffani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Paun ◽  
Roxana Popescu ◽  
Bogdan Calin ◽  
Cosmin Mustaciosu ◽  
Maria Dinescu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document