scholarly journals Metasomatism and Partial Melting in Upper-Mantle Peridotite Xenoliths from the Lashaine Volcano, Northern Tanzania

2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1749-1777 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. DAWSON
2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1107-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nóra Liptai ◽  
Levente Patkó ◽  
István J. Kovács ◽  
Károly Hidas ◽  
Zsanett Pintér ◽  
...  

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Shoji Arai

No genetic link between the two main types of chromitite, stratiform and podiform chromitites, has ever been discussed. These two types of chromitite have very different geological contexts; the stratiform one is a member of layered intrusions, representing fossil magma chambers, in the crust, and the podiform one forms pod-like bodies, representing fossil magma conduits, in the upper mantle. Chromite grains contain peculiar polymineralic inclusions derived from Na-bearing hydrous melts, whose features are so similar between the two types that they may form in a similar fashion. The origin of the chromite-hosted inclusions in chromitites has been controversial but left unclear. The chromite-hosted inclusions also characterize the products of the peridotite–melt reaction or melt-assisted partial melting, such as dunites, troctolites and even mantle harzburgites. I propose a common origin for the inclusion-bearing chromites, i.e., a reaction between the mantle peridotite and magma. Some of the chromite grains in the stratiform chromitite originally formed in the mantle through the peridotite–magma reaction, possibly as loose-packed young podiform chromitites, and were subsequently disintegrated and transported to a crustal magma chamber as suspended grains. It is noted, however, that the podiform chromitites left in the mantle beneath the layered intrusions are different from most of the podiform chromitites now exposed in the ophiolites.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Dong Sun ◽  
Lipeng Zhang ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Guozhi Xie ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Kimberlite is characterized by explosive eruption powered by excess carbon dioxides (CO2)1 and water2. Given that diamond is the dominant stable phase of carbon in the upper mantle3, it is obscure where does the excess CO2 in kimberlite has come from. Here we show that ferric iron oxidizes diamond at 1900K, 20GPa and 2000K, 25GPa, forming CO2. The lower mantle is dominated by bridgmanite, which is rich in ferric iron4. Bridgmanite decomposes once it is brought to the upper mantle, releasing extra ferric iron. Therefore, the oxidation of diamond may have been popularly occurring at the base of the upper mantle, forming CO2-rich carbonated domains that are the main source of kimberlite. The rising kimberlitic magma reaches the lithosphere mantle of thick cratons before it crosses the solidus line of mantle peridotite, and thus keeps its volatile-rich nature that drives explosive eruptions. When the lithospheric mantle is thinner than ~140 km, kimberlite changes into much less explosive magmas due to partial melting of mantle peridotite, and, consequently, entrained diamond is mostly oxidized during the magma’s slower ascension.


1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (310) ◽  
pp. 153-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hutchison ◽  
A. L. Chambers ◽  
D. K. Paul ◽  
P. G. Harris

SummarySome 200 ultramafic xenoliths and their basaltic hosts from five French localities were studied. New analyses are presented, which show the five host-rocks to be nepheline- and olivine-normative. Seven bulk analyses of xenoliths from four localities, together with analyses of their constituent diopsides and, for six, of their orthopyroxenes, are also presented. Xenoliths from four occurrences appear to have equilibrated at pressures between about 8 to 18 kb at sub-basaltic solidus temperatures. Suites of xenoliths are chemically different. Histograms were used to determine compositions of depleted and ‘undepleted’ upper mantle. A suite of peridotite xenoliths from the Bult-fontein kimberlite pipe is no less depleted in fusible oxides than xenoliths from two French localities. ‘Undepleted’ upper mantle is very similar to ‘pyrolite’ in composition, except that the latter has much higher TiO2, Na2O, and K2O contents. No xenolith encountered in this work has a bulk composition that could yield more than 12% oceanic tholeiite on partial melting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document