Looking for Meaning in Labour Pain: Are Current Pain Measurement Tools Adequate?

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Yvette Whitburn ◽  
Lester Edmund Jones
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 192-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn J Hodgins

Poor pain management practices are generally discussed in terms of barriers associated with the patient, clinician and/or health care organization. The impact of deficiencies in the tools that are used to measure pain are seldom addressed. Three factors are discussed that complicate the measurement of pain: the nature of pain, the lack of meaning associated with scores generated by pain scales, and treatment goals that lack specificity and are not linked to patients' pain scores. The major premise presented in the present article is that the utility of pain measurement is limited because health care professionals do not have a common understanding of the meaning of scores generated by pain measurement tools, especially within the acute care setting. To address this issue, approaches to establishing instrument validity need to be broadened to include the examination of the meaning and consequences of these measurements within a specific context. Substantive improvements in pain management are unlikely to occur until criteria are identified to link explicitly the scores generated by pain measurement tools to treatment goals.


2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement 38) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
A. Pesonen ◽  
R. Suojaranta-Ylinen ◽  
P. Tarkkila ◽  
P. H. Rosenberg

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Sasikaan Nimmaanrat

Pain intensity is considered as the fifth vital sign. However, it is the only vital sign which is subjective, with there being many pain measurement tools for adults to rate their level of pain. Additionally, there is an increasing number of aging populations throughout the world, and pain measurement in this group of people is challenging as geriatrics have both physical and cognitive impairment. The most frequently utilized pain measurement tools are; the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); and faces scales [Faces Pain Scale (FPS) and Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) are the faces scales studied most often] tend to be valid for measuring pain severity in cognitively intact elderly. When problems arise, the VAS is the pain measurement tool found to have more difficulties (including higher rates of failure) than the other tools. In elderly with cognitive deficits, fewer difficulties tend to occur as the tools become simpler, with the most valid and useful tools in the following order: the FPS/FPS-R, the VRS, the 0-10 NRS, and the VAS. Furthermore, simpler pain measurement tools tend to be favored over more complicated tools. Keywords: aging; elderly; geriatrics; older; pain measurement; pain measurement tools


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Bird

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendall Ho ◽  
Julie Spence ◽  
Michael F Murphy

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 735-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Jacob ◽  
Mario Baras ◽  
Aviva Zeev ◽  
Leon Epstein

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. PESONEN ◽  
T. KAUPPILA ◽  
P. TARKKILA ◽  
A. SUTELA ◽  
L. NIINISTÖ ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 265-275
Author(s):  
Daniel C. McFarland ◽  
Christian Bjerre-Real ◽  
Yesne Alici ◽  
William S. Breitbart

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is abundantly represented in most cancer populations and is highly distressing, causing significant psychological and functional morbidity. It does not receive enough attention from cancer clinicians as a certain amount of fatigue is expected from cancer and treatments. However, CRF is a distinct entity and category of fatigue that does not respond to usual restorative measures. This chapter reviews its definition, prevalence, pathophysiology, and assessment including unique contributory causes and distinguishing CRF from other symptoms such as depression and pain. Measurement tools are discussed. Strategies for the management of CRF including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions are reviewed and tips are provided. Evidence is presented for the use of psychostimulants and other drug therapy as well as exercise, psychotherapies, and mind-body interventions (e.g., yoga, acupuncture). CRF is a distinct entity with significant consequences for patients. Its assessment should be thorough and treatment directed toward underlying causes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document