Reliability of the Modified-Modified Schöber and Double Inclinometer Methods for Measuring Lumbar Flexion and Extension

1993 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Williams ◽  
Jill Binkley ◽  
Ralph Bloch ◽  
Charles H Goldsmith ◽  
Terry Minuk
2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 38S-39S ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wei ◽  
Soon-Woo Hong ◽  
Jun Zou ◽  
Benjamin Tow ◽  
Masashi Miyazaki ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy C MacDermid ◽  
Vanitha Arumugam ◽  
Joshua I Vincent ◽  
Kimberly L Payne ◽  
Aubrey K So

Author(s):  
Jason Zafereo ◽  
Sharon Wang-Price ◽  
Tara Dickson

BACKGROUND: The Movement System Impairment (MSI) model is useful for identifying spine-hip mobility and motor control deficits that may contribute to low back pain (LBP). While previous studies have found differences in global spine-hip movement impairments between lumbar MSI subgroups, no studies have compared segmental spine movement impairments between these subgroups. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze segmental lumbar mobility in participants with LBP and a lumbar flexion- or extension-based MSI. METHODS: Forty participants with subacute-chronic LBP were placed into one of three age groups (< 35, 35–54, or > 54 years-old) and then classified into a flexion- or extension-based MSI sub-group. Segmental lumbar range of motion (ROM) was measured in degrees using a skin-surface device. Total lumbar and segmental flexion and extension ROM of L1-L2 to L5-S1 was compared between MSI sub-groups for each age group using separate two-way ANOVAs. RESULTS: Significant main effects were found for the independent variables of MSI subgroup and age. Participants in all three age groups with a flexion-based MSI displayed significantly less lumbar extension (-0.6∘) at L4-5 as compared to participants with an extension-based MSI (-2.1∘), p= 0.03. In addition, lumbar total and segmental ROM was significantly less for older individuals in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with LBP may demonstrate a pattern of lumbar segmental hypomobility in the opposite direction of their MSI. Future studies may investigate the added value of direction-specific spinal mobilization to a program of MSI-based exercise.


2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 358-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Christopher Owens ◽  
Jean-Michel Brismée ◽  
Patricia N. Pennell ◽  
Gregory S. Dedrick ◽  
Phillip S. Sizer ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Luers

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, defines a motion segment as “two adjacent vertebrae, the intervertebral disk, the apophyseal or facet joints, and ligamentous structures between the vertebrae.” The range of motion from segment to segment varies, and loss of motion segment integrity is defined as “an anteroposterior motion of one vertebra over another that is greater than 3.5 mm in the cervical spine, greater than 2.5 mm in the thoracic spine, and greater than 4.5 mm in the lumbar spine.” Multiple etiologies are associated with increased motion in the cervical spine; some are physiologic or compensatory and others are pathologic. The standard radiographic evaluation of instability and ligamentous injury in the cervical spine consists of lateral flexion and extension x-ray views, but no single pattern of injury is identified in whiplash injuries. Fluoroscopy or cineradiographic techniques may be more sensitive than other methods for evaluating subtle abnormal motion in the cervical spine. The increased motion thus detected then must be evaluated to determine whether it represents normal physiologic motion, normal compensatory motion, motion related to underlying degenerative disk and/or facet disease, or increased motion related to ligamentous injury. Imaging studies should be performed and interpreted as instructed in the AMA Guides.


2014 ◽  
Vol 644-650 ◽  
pp. 879-883
Author(s):  
Jing Jing Yu

In various forms of movement of finger rehabilitation training, Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) of single degree of freedom (1 DOF) has outstanding application value. Taking classic flexion and extension movement for instance, this study collected the joint angle data of finger flexion and extension motion by experiments and confirmed that the joint motion of finger are not independent of each other but there is certain rule. This paper studies the finger joint movement rule from qualitative and quantitative aspects, and the conclusion can guide the design of the mechanism and control method of finger rehabilitation training robot.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document