Perineural versus Systemic Dexamethasone to Prolong Analgesia after ultrasound guided Inter-Scalene Brachial Plexsus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgeries

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Amr Abbas AbdelHalem ◽  
Adel Mekhail Fahmy ◽  
Dalia Mahmoud El Fawy ◽  
Marwa Mamdouh Mohamed ElFar
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Neuraxial Block ◽  
Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Poorly controlled acute pain after surgery is associated with a variety of unwanted postoperative consequences, including patient suffering, distress, myocardial ischemia, prolonged hospital stay and increase of chronic pain. Neuraxial block is used for postoperative pain management and decrease analgesic use. Objective To compare the analgesic duration of intravenous and perineural administration of Dexamethasone in interscalene block during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Patients and Methods Interventional randomized Double-Blind Study. This study was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals’ operating rooms throughout six months. In our study, 60 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: Group A (30 patients) Block with 20 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% (+ 2 ml Dexamethasone ‘8 mg’) & 5 ml normal saline was injected IV. Group B (30 patients) Block with 20 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% (+ 2 ml normal saline) & 5 ml Dexamethasone ‘8 mg’ was injected IV. Results Our study showed that addition of 8 mg dexamethasone to bupivacaine in interscalene brachial plexus nerve block prolongs post-operative analgesia & reduced numbers of rescue analgesia doses more than injecting dexamethasone intravenously. Conclusion Addition of perineural dexamethasone to bupivacaine in interscalene brachial nerve block prolongs post-operative analgesia & reduced numbers of rescue analgesia doses more than injecting dexamethasone intravenously. Dexamethasone was seen to be a potent adjunct to local anaesthetic to prolong post-operative analgesia with negligible side effects.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS NALBUPHINE AS INTRATHECAL ADJUVANTS TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE DURING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES – A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND INTERVENTIONAL STUDY.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trishala Jain ◽  
Jaipal .
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Institutional Ethics ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Background: Regional anesthesia techniques for gynecological procedures are on increasing trends due to their advantage of postoperative analgesia owing to intrathecal adjuvants. The present study was aimed to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy of clonidine with nalbuphine when co-administered intrathecally with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for Lower abdominal surgeries in Gynecology. Methods: With institutional ethics committee clearance No. 193MC/EC/2018, randomized, double blind study was conducted. After obtaining informed written consent total of 84 patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n=42) - Inj.  3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml Clonidine(30µg) intrathecally.  Group B (n=42) - Inj.3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5%+0.2 ml Nalbuphine(2mg) intrathecally. The characteristics of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic data, side effects were recorded. Results: The onset of sensory block was earlier in Group B than Group A (3.08±0.52 min vs 4.00±0.54 min, p<0.001 ). The onset of motor block was also earlier in Group B than Group A (7.78±0.80 min vs 8.80±0.95min, p<0.001). The time to first rescue analgesia in patients receiving intrathecal clonidine was significantly delayed than patients receiving intrathecal nalbuphine (284.95 ± 12.93 min vs 211.52 ± 15.92 min, p<0.001). Introperative hemodynamic changes were comparable and none of the patient suffered from respiratory depression except very little cases of shivering which are not significant. Conclusions: Intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine provided was clinically more effective than nalbuphine for prolonging the duration of analgesia for gynecological procedures. Keywords: Bupivacaine, Clonidine, Lower abdominal surgeries in gynecology, Nalbuphine, Subarachnoid block.

scholarly journals A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED COMPARITIVE DOUBLE BLIND STUDY TO DETERMINE THE DURATION OF ANALGESIA OF BUPRENORPHINE AND DEXAMETHASONE AS ADJUNCTS TO BUPIVACAINE IN SCIATICO-POPLITEAL AND SAPHENOUS NERVE BLOCK FOR BELOW KNEE SURGERIES.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Renjith I ◽  
Renu Devaprasath ◽  
Geo Navin Jude ◽  
T. S. Ambujam
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Saphenous Nerve ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time

BACKGROUND: Adjuvants to local anaesthetics improve the block properties and reduce opioid consumption. This study compared combination of local anaesthetic bupivacaine with buprenorphine and dexamethasone in ultrasound guided sciatico-popliteal and saphenous nerve block for below knee surgeries. STUDY DESIGN:A prospective, double-blind, randomized, comparative study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 82 patients posted for elective or emergency below knee surgeries were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group X received 25ml block solution made up of 2mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine with 2mcg/kg buprenorphine and normal saline and group Y received 25ml block solution made of 2mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine with 0.1mg/kg dexamethasone and normal saline. Onset of sensory block, onset of motor block, duration of analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were noted in each group. RESULTS: The mean time of onset of sensory block was earlier in group X (6.730±1.871 min) as compared to group Y (11.340±3.038min). The mean time of onset of motor block was also rapid in group X (9.000±2.121 min) than in group Y (13.020±2.286min). The mean total duration of analgesia was longer in group Y (1098.000±169.216) as compared to group X (794.070±145.084). There was no signicant difference in the mean duration of motor block between the groups. Both the groups were hemodynamically stable, and no signicant side effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Onset of sensory and motor blockade was faster in the buprenorphine group, however duration of analgesia was much longer in the dexamethasone group without any signicant side effects.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the efficacy of 150 micrograms of intrathecal morphine with bupivacaine compared to 250 micrograms for postoperative analgesia following abdominal hysterectomy: a double blinded randomized control study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
G. S. Sai Ram Prudhvi ◽  
N. S. S. Naga Shyam ◽  
Anand Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Intrathecal Morphine ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Preservative Free

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The synergistic action of local anesthetics and morphine is well known, morphine probably more superior for postoperative analgesia, when compared to other opioids. Preservative-free morphine is now available in India making intrathecal administration possible. The present randomized double blind study was designed to evaluate the effect of adding preservative free morphine to hyperbaric bupivacaine given intrathecally for abdominal hysterectomy.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Following approval by the institutional review board and institutional research grant committee, eighty patients presenting for elective abdominal hysterectomy were included in this randomized, double blind study. All drugs used for spinal anesthesia were autoclaved as per the departmental protocol. 3.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% [heavy] was given in both groups along with preservative free morphine according to study group.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> 27.5% (11/40) patients in group A, 17.5% (7/40) patients in group B received one dose of rescue analgesia (ketorolac 10 mg),during the 24 hours for pain relief  while 29 patients is group A (72.5%) and 82.5% (33/40) patients in group B received 2 doses of rescue analgesia. 10% patients in Group A (4/40) and 10% patients in Group B (4/40) had a sedation score of 1 (drowsy and arousable).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mean duration of analgesia in patients who received 250 μgms of intrathecal morphine was 18.725±1.38 hours while in patients who received 150 μgms it is 16.075±1.23 hours. We conclude that 250 µgms of preservative-free intrathecal morphine provides longer duration of analgesia when compared to 150 µgms morphine, with hardly any additional adverse effects.</p>

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine vs. Fentanyl for Attenuation of Haemodynamic Response to Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomised Double Blind Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reema Meena ◽  
Chandrakant Parashar ◽  
Priyanka Jain ◽  
Manoj Soni
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Haemodynamic Changes ◽  
Group A ◽  
American Society ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Laparoscopy is a widely performed minimal invasive surgical procedure, wherein various haemodynamic changes are faced by anaesthesiologists during Pneumoperitoneum (PNP). Aim: To compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl for attenuating the haemodynamics response to PNP in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC). Materials and Methods: A total of 84 patients of 18-50 years age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Class I/II of either sex for elective LC were included. The patients were divided into two groups (A, B) of 42 patients each. Group A received dexmedetomidine and Group B received fentanyl. Both the drugs were given as loading dose of one μg/kg over ten min followed by maintenance 0.2 μg/kg/h throughout the surgery. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded at different time intervals throughout the surgery. In recovery room patients were observed for postoperative analgesia by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), sedation level using RAMSAY Sedation score at every 30 minutes till the time of giving first rescue analgesia and side effects, if any. Results: Intraoperatively, throughout the period of PNP, Group A showed statistically better attenuation of haemodynamic responses in comparison to Group B (p<0.05). After creating PNP, rise in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) was observed in both group A and group B, 99.38±6.32 and 103.43±9.81, respectively but this rise was more in group B which was statistically significant (p<0.05) throughout the surgery except 40 minutes after PNP creation. Time to first rescue analgesia or mean duration of postoperative analgesia (VAS>3) was significantly longer in dexmedetomidine group (102.14±32.50 minutes) than fentanyl group (42.86±15.03 minutes). There was better control of pain but more sedation in Group A than in Group B. Conclusion: This study concludes that intravenously administered dexmedetomidine shows better attenuation of haemodynamic responses to CO2 insufflation as compared to fentanyl. Dexmedetomidine also provides better sedation and has more analgesic sparing effect.

High Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Double-Blind Study

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahadir Ciftci ◽  
Mursel Ekinci ◽  
Birzat Emre Gölboyu ◽  
Furkan Kapukaya ◽  
Yunus Oktay Atalay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Surgery ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Block Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Erector Spinae Plane Block ◽  
Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery ◽  
Effective Analgesia

Abstract Objective Moderate to severe pain may occur following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. An erector spinae plane block (ESPB) may be used for painful conditions of the shoulder. The primary hypothesis of this trial is that ultrasound-guided ESPB would provide effective analgesia by reducing opioid consumption. The secondary hypothesis is that ESPB would result in low pain scores and reduce the use of rescue analgesia. Design Randomized prospective double-blind study. Setting Academic university hospital. Subjects Sixty patients aged between 18 and 65 years designated as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II who underwent unilateral arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. Methods Patients were equally divided into two groups—either the ESPB group (n=30) or the sham block group (n=30). ESPB was performed with 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine at the T2 level in the ESPB group and sham block with 30 mL saline at the T2 level in the sham block group. Twenty minutes before the end of the operation, 100 mg tramadol was administered intravenously to the patients. Intravenous ibuprofen 400 mg 3 × 1 was ordered for the patients during the postoperative period. A patient control analgesia device including a dose of 10 µg/mL fentanyl was connected to the patients. Results There were no statistical differences between groups in terms of demographical data. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the sham block group (96.66 µg ±105.57 µg and 230 µg ±247.17 µg, respectively) (P=0.009). The need for rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the sham block group (26.66 mg ±35.43 mg and 48.5 mg ±35.45 mg, respectively) (P=0.020). Overall, the visual analog scale scores were significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the sham block group. Conclusions ESPB may provide effective analgesia treatment following arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

scholarly journals PRETREATMENT WITH LIGNOCAINE

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 633-637
Author(s):  
MOBEEN IKRAM ◽  
MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE ◽  
NAVEED MASOOD
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pain On Injection ◽  
Experienced Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Group B ◽  
Induction Of Anaesthesia

Objective: To assess the frequency of pain and withdrawal movements after injection of rocuronium and effects of pre-treatment with lignocaine. Study Design: Double blind study. Duration of Study: This study was of six months duration and was carried out from March 2004 to September 2004. Setting: Combined Military Hospital Kharian. Patients and Methods: One hundred and twenty unpremedicated patients with ASA grade I and II, aged between 18-60 years and of both sexes were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 60 patients each. After induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone, patients in group A received 3 ml of lignocaine plain while those in group B, received 3 ml of normal saline as pre-treatment before injection of rocuronium. Their effects on pain on injection and withdrawalmovements of the arm were studied. Results: Out of total of 120 patients, only 17 patients (14%) developed withdrawal movements of the arm or wrist. In Group A, who received lignocaine plain before rocuronium injection, only 3 patients out of 60 patients had withdrawal movements while in Group B, who received normal saline as pre-treatment fourteen out of 60 patients developed withdrawal movements of the arm or wrist. Only one patient belonging to Group B experienced pain. Conclusions: Pretreatment with lignocaine plain greatly reduces the chances of withdrawal movements and pain on injection of rocuronium.

Comparative Evaluation of 0.1% Octenidine Mouthwash with 0.2% Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Prevention of Plaque and Gingivitis – A Clinicomicrobiological Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-210
Author(s):  
Sowmya Sadanandan ◽  
Suhas S ◽  
Sanjay Venugopal ◽  
Kavitha Karur
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Properties ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Gingival Inflammation ◽  
Patient Acceptability ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Microbiological Parameters ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Background: Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of 0.1% Octenidine mouthwash as an anti-plaque agent and to assess its effect on gingival inflammation and staining of teeth when compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate by evaluating the impact on plaque and gingival inflammation as well as on microbial load. Materials and Methods: A three week double blind study was conducted on 69 subjects, aged 20-50 years, with moderate to severe gingivitis. The study population was divided into three groups with 23 subjects in each group: Group A - control subjects received only scaling, Group B received 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate in addition to scaling and Group C received 0.1% Octenidine mouthwash along with scaling. Clinical and microbiological parameters were recorded at baseline, on 14th day and on 21st day. Subjective and objective criteria were assessed on the 14th day and 21st day. Results: There was a statistically significant reduction in all the tested parameters within all the three groups and between the groups from baseline to 21st day. The highest mean reduction in all the parameters was seen in subjects using 0.1% Octenidine. On comparison with the control group, subjects using the mouthwashes (Group B and Group C) had better improvement in clinical and microbiological parameters from baseline to 21st day. On comparison with chlorhexidine, Octenidine mouthwash significantly reduced plaque (p<0.05) and showed better patient acceptability. However, it was comparable to chlorhexidine in other two tested parameters. Conclusion: Owing to Octenidine’s pronounced and comparable antibacterial properties, it can be a promising candidate for the use in antiseptic mouthwashes.

The role of tolvaptan in prevention of hyponatremia in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate surgery- A randomized double blind study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-325
Author(s):  
Dinesh Kumar Singh ◽  
B B Baj ◽  
Vipin Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Transurethral Resection ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Transurethral Resection Of Prostate ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

The aim of our study to determine the role of tolvaptan in prevention of hyponatremia in transurethral resection of prostate surgery. This is randomized double-blind study conducted in 60 ASA grade status 1 and 2 patients age group between 45-80 yrs undergoing TURP under spinal anaesthesia in urology operation theatre in Mahatma Gandhi hospital Jaipur after receiving permission from hospital ethical committee. A detailed history, complete physical examination and routine investigation were done for all patients followed by informed written consent was obtained. Patients are randomly divided into 2 groups. In group A -30 patients who received orally tab tolvaptan 15 mg and group B-30 patients who received orally tab multivitamin 2 hrs before surgery after doing electrolytes of the patients in the morning. In both groups age (in yrs), wt (in kg), ASA grade, volume of irrigating fluid (in litres), volume of prostate resected (in gm) and duration of surgery (in minutes) all demographic and surgical details data were compared. Electrolytes were compared in both groups pre and post-operatively and statistical analysis was done.There was significant difference in post-operative sodium level between the two groups (A and B). The mean level of sodium significantly reduced post-operatively in group –B (control grp). The mean level of sodium significantly increased post-operatively in group –A (tolvaptan grp). We conclude single dose of tolvaptan -15 mg found to effective in prevention of hyponatremia in patients undergoing TURP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document