scholarly journals Dash for Cash: Monthly Market Impact of Institutional Liquidity Needs

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erkko Etula ◽  
Kalle Rinne ◽  
Matti Suominen ◽  
Lauri Vaittinen
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Equity Capital ◽  
Market Impact ◽  
Limits To Arbitrage ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Published Paper

Abstract We present broad-based evidence that the monthly payment cycle induces systematic patterns in liquid markets around the globe. First, we document temporary increases in the costs of debt and equity capital that coincide with key dates associated with month-end cash needs. Second, we present direct and indirect evidence on the role of institutions in the genesis of these patterns and derive estimates of the associated costs borne by market participants. Third, and finally, we investigate the limits to arbitrage that prevent markets from functioning efficiently. Our results indicate that many investors and their agents, including mutual funds, suffer from liquidity-related trading. Received January 16, 2018; editorial decision January 2, 2019 by Editor Robin Greenwood. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Teachers Teaching Teachers: The Role of Workplace Peer Effects in Financial Decisions

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 3920-3957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Maturana ◽  
Jordan Nickerson
Keyword(s):  
Peer Interactions ◽  
Peer Groups ◽  
Financial Decisions ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Transmission Of Information ◽  
Mortgage Refinancing ◽  
Financial Decision ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Published Paper

Abstract This paper studies the role of workplace peers in the transmission of information pertinent to an important household financial decision: the mortgage refinancing choice. Exploiting commonalities in teaching schedules of school teachers in Texas to identify peer groups, we find that refinancing activity among teachers’ peers increases their likelihood of refinancing by 20.7%. The effect of peers increases with the potential savings realized upon refinancing and is stronger among younger teachers. Peers also affect teachers’ choice of lender. Overall, our findings suggest that peer interactions greatly reduce a household’s cost of acquiring and processing financial information. Received March 6, 2017; editorial decision July 31, 2018 by Editor Itay Goldstein. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

The Economic Impact of Index Investing

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 3461-3499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Brogaard ◽  
Matthew C Ringgenberg ◽  
David Sovich
Keyword(s):  
Commodity Markets ◽  
Negative Externality ◽  
Feedback Channel ◽  
Production Decisions ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Published Paper ◽  
Index Investing

Abstract We study the impact of index investing on firm performance by examining the link between commodity indices and firms that use index commodities. Around 2004, commodity index investing dramatically increased. This event is referred to as the financialization of commodity markets. Following financialization, firms that use index commodities make worse production decisions, earn 40% lower profits, and have 6% higher costs. Consistent with a feedback channel in which market participants learn from prices, our results suggest that index investing distorts the price signal, thereby generating a negative externality that impedes firms’ ability to make production decisions. Received March 31, 2017; editorial decision July 5, 2018 by Editor Itay Goldstein. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Returns to Talent and the Finance Wage Premium

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 4005-4040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Célérier ◽  
Boris Vallée
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Education System ◽  
Performance Pay ◽  
Higher Education System ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Wage Returns ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Project Size ◽  
Published Paper

Abstract To study the role of talent in finance workers’ pay, we exploit a special feature of the French higher education system. Wage returns to talent have been significantly higher and have risen faster since the 1980s in finance than in other sectors. Both wage returns to project size and the elasticity of project size to talent are also higher in this industry. Last, the share of performance pay varies more for talent in finance. These findings are supportive of finance wages reflecting the competitive assignment of talent in an industry that exhibits a high complementarity between talent and scale. Received October 11, 2017; editorial decision September 4, 2018 by Editor Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

scholarly journals Multinational Banks and Supranational Supervision

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 2997-3035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Calzolari ◽  
Jean-Edouard Colliard ◽  
Gyongyi Lóránth
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Organizational Structures ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Coordination Failures ◽  
The Public ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Multinational Banks ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Public Costs ◽  
Published Paper

Abstract Supervision of multinational banks (MNBs) by national supervisors suffers from coordination failures. We show that supranational supervision solves this problem and decreases the public costs of an MNB’s failure, taking its organizational structure as given. However, the MNB strategically adjusts its structure to supranational supervision. It converts its subsidiary into a branch (or vice versa) to reduce supervisory monitoring. We identify the cases in which this endogenous reaction leads to unintended consequences, such as higher public costs and lower welfare. Current reforms should consider that MNBs adapt their organizational structures to changes in supervision. Received January 9, 2017; editorial decision September 15, 2018 by Editor Philip Strahan. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

scholarly journals The Effects of Losing a Business Group Affiliation

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 3036-3074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borja Larrain ◽  
Giorgo Sertsios ◽  
Francisco Urzúa I
Keyword(s):  
Business Group ◽  
The Other ◽  
Group Affiliation ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Capital Misallocation ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Business Group Affiliation ◽  
Industry Peers ◽  
Published Paper ◽  
Identification Strategy

Abstract We propose a novel identification strategy for estimating the effects of business group affiliation. We study two-firm business groups, some of which split up during the sample period, leaving some firms as stand-alone firms. We instrument for stand-alone status using shocks to the industry of the other group firm. We find that firms that become stand-alone reduce leverage and investment. Consistent with collateral cross-pledging, the effects are more pronounced when the other firm had high tangibility. Consistent with capital misallocation in groups, the reduction in leverage is stronger in firms that had low (high) profitability (leverage) relative to industry peers. Received July 3, 2017; editorial decision April 7, 2018 by Editor Wei Jiang. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

scholarly journals Noncognitive Abilities and Financial Distress: Evidence from a Representative Household Panel

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 3884-3919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Parise ◽  
Kim Peijnenburg
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Web Site ◽  
Income Shocks ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Differential Exposure ◽  
Published Paper ◽  
Oxford University Press ◽  
Low Ability

AbstractThis paper provides evidence of how noncognitive abilities affect financial distress. In a representative panel of households, we find that people in the bottom quintile of noncognitive abilities are 10 times more likely to experience financial distress than those in the top quintile. We provide evidence that this relation largely arises from worse financial choices and lack of financial insight by low-ability individuals and reflects differential exposure to income shocks only to a lesser degree. We mitigate endogeneity concerns using an IV approach and an extensive set of controls. Implications for policy and finance research are discussed.Received September 24, 2017; editorial decision September 26, 2018 by Editor Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

scholarly journals Contingent Capital Trigger Effects: Evidence from Liability Management Exercises

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Vallée
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Web Site ◽  
Regulatory Capital ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Contingent Capital ◽  
Liability Management ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Debt Holders ◽  
Published Paper

AbstractThis paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience.Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 3766-3803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jawad M Addoum ◽  
Justin R Murfin
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Wall Street Journal ◽  
Equity Markets ◽  
Wall Street ◽  
Private Debt ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
The Wall Street Journal ◽  
Equity Price ◽  
Published Paper

Abstract Equity markets fail to account for the value-relevant nonpublic information enjoyed by syndicated loan participants and reflected in publicly posted loan prices. A long-short strategy that buys (sells) the equities of firms with recently appreciated (depreciated) loans earns large risk-adjusted returns, suggesting a surprising and economically important level of segmentation across the same firm’s capital structure. The information lag captured by trading strategy returns is not affected by drivers of firm-specific attention, including the publication of loan returns in the Wall Street Journal. Instead, returns to the strategy are eliminated among equities held by mutual funds also trading in syndicated loans. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

scholarly journals Auto Credit and the 2005 Bankruptcy Reform: The Impact of Eliminating Cramdowns

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 4734-4766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajashri Chakrabarti ◽  
Nathaniel Pattison
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rates ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Web Site ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Historical Variation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Published Paper ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Auto lenders were perhaps the biggest winners of the 2005 Bankruptcy Reform, as Chapter 13 bankruptcy filers can no longer “cramdown” the amount owed on recent auto loans. We estimate the causal effect of this anticramdown provision on the price and quantity of auto credit. Exploiting historical variation in states’ usage of Chapter 13 bankruptcy, we find strong evidence that eliminating cramdowns decreased interest rates and some evidence that loan sizes increased among subprime borrowers. The decline in interest rates is persistent and is robust to a battery of sensitivity checks. We rule out other reform changes as possible causes. Received September 29, 2016; editorial decision January 15, 2019 by Editor Philip Strahan. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

scholarly journals Socioeconomic Status and Macroeconomic Expectations

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 395-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreyoshi Das ◽  
Camelia M Kuhnen ◽  
Stefan Nagel
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Durable Goods ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Market Returns ◽  
Stock Market Returns ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Business Conditions ◽  
Published Paper

Abstract We show that individuals’ macroeconomic expectations are influenced by their socioeconomic status (SES). People with higher income or higher education are more optimistic about future macroeconomic developments, including business conditions, the national unemployment rate, and stock market returns. The spread in beliefs between high- and low-SES individuals diminishes significantly during recessions. A comparison with professional forecasters and historical data reveals that the beliefs wedge reflects excessive pessimism on the part of low-SES individuals. SES-driven expectations help explain why higher-SES individuals are more inclined to invest in the stock market and more likely to consider purchasing homes, durable goods, or cars. Received November 13, 2017; editorial decision February 12, 2019 by Editor Wei Jiang. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document