Clinical and imaging characteristics of osteitis condensans ilii as compared with axial spondyloarthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 3798-3806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Poddubnyy ◽  
Henning Weineck ◽  
Torsten Diekhoff ◽  
Imke Redeker ◽  
Nino Gobejishvili ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Osteitis condensans ilii (OCI) has become an important differential diagnosis for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objective of this matched case–control study was to investigate demographic, clinical, laboratory and MRI characteristics of OCI as compared with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods A total of 60 patients diagnosed with OCI were included in the final analysis. From 27 of these patients, MRIs of the sacroiliac joints were available. OCI patients were matched with a 1:1 ratio by back pain duration to patients with definite axSpA in order to compare clinical, laboratory and MRI characteristics. Results The OCI patients were nearly all females (96.7 vs 46.7%), had a significantly lower prevalence of inflammatory back pain (39.5 vs 88.9%), a significantly lower percentage of HLA-B27 positives (35.2 vs 80.0%) and a lower prevalence of the majority of other SpA features as compared with axSpA patients. Interestingly, there was no difference in the prevalence of osteitis in the sacroiliac joints (92.6 vs 85.2% in OCI and axSpA, respectively, P = 0.44), but there was a difference in the prevalence of erosions (7.4 vs 66.7%, respectively, P = 0.0001). In addition, in OCI nearly all lesions were localized in the anterior part of the sacroiliac joints while in axSpA lesions were localized predominantly in the middle part of the joint (for osteitis: 96 vs 4% in OCI and 28.6 vs 71.4% in axSpA; P = 0.0002 for the inter-group difference). Conclusion Clinical and imaging features of OCI compared with axSpA are described that should help in differential diagnosis.

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadaf Saeed ◽  
Muhammad Safwan Jamal ◽  
Dave Ostry ◽  
Graham Robinson ◽  
Rajiv Sengupta

Abstract Background/Aims  Osteitis condensans ilii (OCI) is a rare cause of chronic non-inflammatory axial lower back pain. It has become an important differential diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. Bone marrow oedema can be present in 48% of patients. Although 'aunt minnie' appearance on MRI is pathognomonic, specialised imaging like SPECT/PET CT can be considered in difficult cases to confirm the diagnosis. We reviewed case notes of patients with incidental diagnosis of OCI on imaging and followed their clinical progression to see if the diagnosis was modified later. Methods  Retrospective radiological database analysis was performed to find imaging reported as OCI or osteitis from 2015-2020. Electronic patient records were analyzed and data was compiled through Microsoft Excel. Results  Data from 24 patients was reviewed. Most patients were females (91.7%), with a median age of 43 years (range 19-79 years). CT and MRI were the chief modalities of imaging (46% and 38% respectively) while 20% had plain x-rays of the pelvis. The main indications for imaging were pelvic or hip girdle pain (58.3%), cancer surveillance (25%), abdominal pain (6%), and infection (6%). 20% had an underlying rheumatological diagnosis of which 8% had spondyloarthritis. 12.5% of patients had seronegative features of spondyloarthritis and 8.3% were HLA B27 positive. Approximately 40% of patients were seen by the Rheumatology team for further assessment after imaging and 12.5% of patients were diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis and remained under follow-up. Conclusion  OCI can mimic sacroiliitis on imaging. Although only a minority of patients with OCI reported on initial imaging were subsequently diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis, thorough clinical assessment and multidisciplinary discussion can reduce the chance of a missed axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis. Further large-scale studies are required to find the exact incidence of spondyloarthritis in patients with imaging features of OCI. Disclosure  S. Saeed: None. M. Jamal: None. D. Ostry: None. G. Robinson: None. R. Sengupta: None.


2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline A C Bakker ◽  
Rosaline van den Berg ◽  
Gregory Lenczner ◽  
Fabrice Thévenin ◽  
Monique Reijnierse ◽  
...  

ObjectivesInvestigating the utility of adding structural lesions seen on MRI of the sacroiliac joints to the imaging criterion of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis (ASAS) axial SpondyloArthritis (axSpA) criteria and the utility of replacement of radiographic sacroiliitis by structural lesions on MRI.MethodsTwo well-calibrated readers scored MRI STIR (inflammation, MRI-SI), MRI T1-w images (structural lesions, MRI-SI-s) and radiographs of the sacroiliac joints (X-SI) of patients in the DEvenir des Spondyloarthrites Indifférenciées Récentes cohort (inflammatory back pain: ≥3 months, <3 years, age <50). A third reader adjudicated MRI-SI and X-SI discrepancies. Previously proposed cut-offs for a positive MRI-SI-s were used (based on <5% prevalence among no-SpA patients): erosions (E) ≥3, fatty lesions (FL) ≥3, E/FL ≥5. Patients were classified according to the ASAS axSpA criteria using the various definitions of MRI-SI-s.ResultsOf the 582 patients included in this analysis, 418 fulfilled the ASAS axSpA criteria, of which 127 patients were modified New York (mNY) positive and 134 and 75 were MRI-SI-s positive (E/FL≥5) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Agreement between mNY and MRI-SI-s (E/FL≥5) was moderate (reader 1: κ: 0.39; reader 2: κ: 0.44). Using the E/FL≥5 cut-off instead of mNY classification did not change in 478 (82.1%) and 469 (80.6%) patients for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Twelve (reader 1) or ten (reader 2) patients would not be classified as axSpA if only MRI-SI-s was performed (in the scenario of replacement of mNY), while three (reader 1) or six (reader 2) patients would be additionally classified as axSpA in both scenarios (replacement of mNY and addition of MRI-SI-s). Similar results were seen for the other cut-offs (E≥3, FL≥3).ConclusionsStructural lesions on MRI can be used reliably either as an addition to or as a substitute for radiographs in the ASAS axSpA classification of patients in our cohort of patients with short symptom duration.


2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 985-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Weber ◽  
Veronika Zubler ◽  
Zheng Zhao ◽  
Robert GW Lambert ◽  
Stanley M Chan ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the incremental diagnostic value of spine MRI evaluated separately from and combined with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) MRI in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) compared with SIJ MRI alone.MethodsThe study sample comprised two independent cohorts A/B of 130 consecutive patients aged ≤50 years with back pain, newly referred to two university clinics, and 20 healthy controls. Patients were classified according to clinical examination and pelvic radiographs as having nr-axSpA (n=50), ankylosing spondylitis (n=33), or non-specific back pain (n=47). Four readers assessed SIJ and spine MRI separately 6 months apart, and 1–12 months later both scans simultaneously using standardised modules. Readers recorded presence/absence of SpA and their level of confidence in this conclusion on a 0–10 scale (0=definitely not; 10=definite). We analysed differences between SIJ MRI versus spine MRI alone, and SIJ MRI alone versus combined MRI, descriptively by the number/percentage of subjects according to the mean of four readers.ResultsIn cohorts A/B, 15.8%/24.2% of patients with nr-axSpA having a negative SIJ MRI were reclassified as being positive for SpA by global evaluation of combined scans. However, 26.8%/11.4% of non-specific back pain controls and 17.5% of healthy volunteers with a negative SIJ MRI were falsely reclassified as having SpA by combined MRI. Low confidence in a diagnosis of SpA by SIJ MRI increased to high confidence by combined MRI in 6.6%/7.3% of patients with nr-axSpA.ConclusionsCombined spine and SIJ MRI added little incremental value compared with SIJ MRI alone for diagnosing patients with nr-axSpA and enhancing confidence in this diagnosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S229-S230
Author(s):  
Fatma Hammami ◽  
Makram Koubaa ◽  
Amal Chakroun ◽  
Khaoula Rekik ◽  
Chakib Marrakchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is an infection of the intervertebral disc(s) and/or adjacent vertebrae. It might be associated with epidural involvement. We aimed to study clinical, laboratory and evolutionary features of epidural involvement complicating pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Methods We conducted a retrospective study including patients hospitalized for spondylodiscitis with epidural involvement in the infectious diseases department between 2007 and 2019. Results We included 22 patients among whom 16 were males (72.7%). The mean age was 64±11 years. Eleven patients had diabetes mellitus (50%). The onset of the disease was acute in 18 cases (81.8%) and sub-acute in 4 cases (18.2%). The median delay to diagnosis was 4 [2-13] weeks. The revealing symptoms were back pain (95.5%), fever (68.2%) and asthenia (54.5%). Motor deficit was noted in 9 cases (40.9%), sensory deficit in 4 cases (18.2%) and sphincter dysfunction in one case (4.5%). Physical examination revealed spinal tenderness (77.3%), paravertebral tenderness (22.7%) and spinal stiffness (18.2%). Blood cultures were positive in 13 cases (59.1%) represented by Staphylococcus aureus (31.8%). Elevated C-reactive protein levels (81.8%) and accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (63.6%) were noted. Imaging features showed vertebral body osteolysis (81.8%), inflammation of adjacent soft tissue (81.8%), spinal cord compression (40.9%) and psoas abscess (13.6%). Along with medical treatment, immobilisation (72.7%), abscess drainage (13.6%) and surgery (9.1%) were indicated. The disease evolution was favourable in 20 cases (90.9%). Two patients were dead (9.1%). Sequelae were noted in 9 cases (40.9%) represented by back pain (31.8%) and spinal deformity (9.1%). Conclusion Spondylodiscitis complicated with epidural involvement might lead to complications and sequelae if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A144.2-A145
Author(s):  
R. van den Berg ◽  
M. de Hooge ◽  
V. Navarro Compán ◽  
M. Reijnierse ◽  
F. van Gaalen ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 1679-1683
Author(s):  
Guillermo Carvajal Alegria ◽  
Marie Voirin-Hertz ◽  
Florent Garrigues ◽  
Marion Herbette ◽  
Lucile Deloire ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Lumbosacral transitional vertebras (LSTVs) are common in the general population, but their potential impact on the sacroiliac joints is unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of LSTVs and to assess their associations with sacroiliitis by standard radiography and MRI in a population with suspected axial spondyloarthritis. Methods The data were from the DESIR cohort of 688 patients aged 18–50 years with inflammatory low back pain for ⩾3 months but &lt;3 years suggesting axial spondyloarthritis. The baseline pelvic radiographs were read by two blinded readers for the presence and type (Castellvi classification) of LSTVs. Associations between LSTVs and other variables collected at baseline and at the diagnosis were assessed using the χ2 test (or Fisher's exact test) or the Mann–Whitney test. Results LSTV was found in 200/688 (29.1%) patients. Castellvi type was Ia in 54 (7.8%), Ib in 76 (11.0%), IIa in 20 (2.9%), IIb in 12 (1.7%), IIIa in 7 (1.0%), IIIb in 21 (3.0%) and IV in 10 (1.4%) patients. Compared with the group without LSTVs, the group with LSTVs had higher proportions of patients meeting modified New York criteria for radiographic sacroiliitis (19% vs 27%, respectively; P = 0.013) and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society MRI criteria for sacroiliitis (29% vs 39%, respectively; P = 0.019). Conclusion In patients with inflammatory back pain suggesting axial spondyloarthritis, LSTVs are associated with both radiographic and MRI sacroiliitis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1086-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Ez-Zaitouni ◽  
P A C Bakker ◽  
M van Lunteren ◽  
I J Berg ◽  
R Landewé ◽  
...  

ObjectivesConcerns have been raised about overdiagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). We investigated whether patients with chronic back pain (CBP) of short duration and multiple SpA features are always diagnosed with axSpA by the rheumatologist, and to what extent fulfilment of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) axSpA criteria is associated with an axSpA diagnosis.MethodsBaseline data from 500 patients from the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early cohort which includes patients with CBP (≥3 months, ≤2 years, onset <45 years) were analysed. All patients underwent full diagnostic workup including MRI of the sacroiliac joints (MRI-SI) and radiograph of sacroiliac joints (X-SI). For each patient, the total number of SpA features excluding sacroiliac imaging and human leucocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) status was calculated.ResultsBefore sacroiliac imaging and HLA-B27 testing, 32% of patients had ≤1 SpA feature, 29% had 2 SpA features, 16% had 3 SpA features and 24% had ≥4 SpA features. A diagnosis of axSpA was made in 250 (50%) of the patients: 24% with ≤1 SpA feature, 43% with 2 SpA features, 62% with 3 SpA features and 85% with ≥4 SpA features. Of the 230 patients with a positive ASAS classification 40 (17.4%) did not have a diagnosis of axSpA. HLA-B27 positivity (OR 5.6; 95% CI 3.7 to 8.3) and any (MRI-SI and/or X-SI) positive imaging (OR 34.3; 95% CI 17.3 to 67.7) were strong determinants of an axSpA diagnosis.ConclusionsIn this cohort of patients with CBP, neither the presence of numerous SpA features nor fulfilment of the ASAS classification criteria did automatically lead to a diagnosis axSpA. Positive imaging was considered particularly important in making a diagnosis of axSpA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document