scholarly journals High disease activity is a predictor of cortical hand bone loss in post-menopausal patients with established rheumatoid arthritis: a 5-year multicentre longitudinal study

Rheumatology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 1676-1682 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hoff ◽  
P. Boyesen ◽  
G. Haugeberg ◽  
M. Vis ◽  
A. D. Woolf ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062232098151
Author(s):  
Chung-Yuan Hsu ◽  
Jia-Feng Chen ◽  
Yu-Jih Su ◽  
Ying-Chou Chen ◽  
Han-Ming Lai ◽  
...  

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with poor bone mineral density (BMD). We designed the current study owing to the lack of long-term prospective studies regarding whether a high disease activity leads to increased bone loss. Methods: We have continually enrolled patients with RA. According to the average disease activity score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) during follow-up, the patients were classified into remission, low disease activity, and moderate or high disease activity groups. Patients were examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up. BMD changes were compared among the groups. Results: We have studied 477 patients. Overall BMD was significantly reduced from baseline to the 3-year follow-up ( p < 0.05). After stratifying according to the time-averaged DAS28-ESR levels and use of anti-osteoporosis treatment (AOT), the BMD values of the femur and spine significantly increased in patients in the remission group with AOT. The BMD changes of different DAS28-ESR patients were further compared using the generalized estimation equation model. For the patients on AOT, the negative change in femoral BMD values of the moderate or high activity group was significant when compared with the remission group with positive BMD changes (regression coefficient, –0.038; 95% confidence interval, –0.055 to –0.021). Conclusion: For RA patients, if remission is achieved, AOT can better improve BMD, especially in the femur. In addition, moderate or high disease activity will lead to significant bone loss; therefore, disease activity must be actively controlled.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 378-379
Author(s):  
B. Fautrel ◽  
R. Caporali ◽  
E. Holdsworth ◽  
B. Donaghy ◽  
M. Khalid ◽  
...  

Background:The principles of treat to target (T2T) include defining an appropriate treatment target, assessed at pre-defined intervals, with a commitment to changing therapeutic approach if the target is not met (1). T2T is recommended as a key strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Objectives:To explore attitudes towards T2T, its implementation and stated treatment goals among physicians and their patients with RA.Methods:The Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™ was a large, quantitative, point-in-time survey conducted amongst rheumatologists (n=296) and their consulting patients with RA (n=3042) in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) between Q4 2019–Q3 2020. Physicians were recruited via publicly available lists, completing an online survey and medical record extraction for their next 10–12 consecutive patients. The same patients were invited to voluntarily complete a self-report questionnaire (n=1098, 36% response), collecting data on attitudes towards T2T and treatment goals.Results:Physicians reported that 76% of patients were in remission (DAS28: <2.6) or had low disease activity (DAS28: 2.6 – 3.2), and 24% had moderate-high disease activity (DAS28: >3.2). Patient mean age was 53.0 years (SD 14.0), mean time since diagnosis was 7.2 years (SD 7.2). The proportion of patients currently receiving an advanced therapy (AT; defined as biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD) was 68%, of whom 70% were on a first line AT. No difference was observed between disease activity groups.In the physician survey, 86% of physicians stated they followed T2T principals in at least some of their RA patients, and would utilize a T2T approach in RA patients with moderate-high disease activity (61%), the most uncontrolled patients (37%) and those who do not respond well to initial therapy (34%). In this sample of real-world RA patients, 66% were reported by physicians to be on a T2T plan at the time of data collection. The most common physician-reported targets were remission (DAS28: <2.6) (75%), improvement of quality of life (QoL) (41%) and reduction of pain (31%), with 85% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most stated reasons for not implementing T2T was physician preference not to adjust current treatment (34%), patient preference not to adjust current treatment (23%), and there are no achievable goals for this patient (16%).Overall, 29% of patients reported they were involved in setting their T2T goals, while 34% stated their T2T goals were set by their physicians only, and 29% perceived no T2T goal had been set (n=620). The most common overall T2T goals from the patient perspective were remission (61%), controlling symptoms (41%), and reducing impact on QoL (34%). Of those patients who acknowledged a T2T goal had been set (n=407), 77% reported their T2T goal was fully or partially achieved.Of 719 patients who had moderate-high disease activity, 57% were on a T2T plan, with 46% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most common physician-stated reason for not implementing T2T was a lack of achievable targets (29%).Conclusion:Rheumatologists in this study reported a strong belief in T2T. The most common physician-set T2T goals were remission, improvement of QoL and reduction of pain, corresponding with T2T goals as reported by patients. However, a third of patients in this cohort were not aware of a defined T2T objective in their management, which may be a result of a perceived lack of achievable goals by physicians. It may be desirable to promote more patient involvement in defining achievable targets amongst those with moderate-high disease activity who despite best efforts may not reach a clinical state of remission. Further research is needed to identify and understand goals important to RA patients.References:[1]van Vollenhoven R. Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis - are we there yet? Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(3):180-6.Acknowledgements:This study was funded by Galapagos NV, Belgium.Medical writing support was provided by Gary Sidgwick, PhD (Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK) and editorial support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific, Bollington, UK), both funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of Interests:Bruno Fautrel Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, NORDIC Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Sanofi, Fresenius Kabi, Samsung Bioepis, MSD, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Elizabeth Holdsworth Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Bethany Donaghy Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Mona Khalid Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Mark Moore Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Speakers bureau: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Paid instructor for: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Consultant of: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Employee of: Gilead Sciences, and previously Sanofi and AstraZeneca, Katrien Van Beneden Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Yves Piette Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Grünenthal and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Mylan and UCB, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Grunenthal, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Janssen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gebro, Janssen, Lilly, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Jasper Broen Shareholder of: Pharming Group, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Peter C. Taylor Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Nordic Pharma, Fresenius, UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1647.2-1647
Author(s):  
G. Lukina ◽  
P. Kulakova ◽  
N. Savenkova ◽  
E. Volnukhin ◽  
A. Kovshik ◽  
...  

Background:Аnkylosing Spondylitis (AS) is closely associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). About 6-46% of patients with IBD have various lesions of the musculoskeletal system [1]. 5-10% of patients with spondylarthritis (SpA) eventually develop IBD, with Crohn’s disease (CD) being more common than Ulcerative colitis (UC) [2]. Determining the level of fecal calprotectin (FC) is a study that allows to diagnose IBD. The concentration of FC directly depends on the neutrophil infiltration of the intestinal mucosa and has a direct connection with the activity of the inflammatory process [3]. It is known that level of FC increases in 2/3 of patients with AS and is closely related to parameters reflecting higher disease activity [4].Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of IBD in patients with AS using an assessment of FC level.Methods:In the analysis were included 40 patients with AS, fulfilling the modified New York criteria, among them man -26 (65%), woman -14 (35%), mean age of patients was 41.2 ±10.5, mean disease duration - 13±8.8 years. All patients were examined with ESR, CRP, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy and quantitative analysis of the fecal calprotectin levels using the method of lateral immunochromatography with the BUHLMANN Quantum Blue rapid test. Standart range: 100-1800 µg /g.Results:All patients had a high disease activity, mean BASDAI was 5.2 ± 1.7, mean ASDAS CRP 3.8 ± 1.1. 35 patients (87.5 %) had FC level more than 100 µg / g, the remaining 5 patients (12.5%) less than 100 µg /g. 12 patients (30 %) had FC level more than 1,800 µg / g, 23 (57.5 %) from 101 µg / g to 1800 µg / g. All patients with FC levels more than 100 µg / g showed an increase CRP (mean 28.4 mg / l) and ESR (mean 36.3 mm\h) levels. IBD were diagnosed in 9 cases (22.5%): 5 patients (12.5 %) with CD and 4 patients (10 %) - UC, in the remaining cases (77.5%) was no intestinal pathology.Conclusion:The results showed high frequency of IBD in patients with AS. Patients with high FC levels (more than 100 μg/g) had high disease activity (AS). In most cases, inflammatory bowel disease were diagnosed in patients with FC levels more than 100 µg/g.References:[1] Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Rawsthorne P, Yu N. The prevalence of extraintestinal diseases in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Apr;96(4):1116-22.[2] Klingberg, E., Strid, H., Stahl, A.et al. A longitudinal study of fecal calprotectin and the development of inflammatory bowel disease in ankylosing spondylitis. A longitudinal study of fecal calprotectin and the development of inflammatory bowel disease in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther 2017. 19(1):21[3] Cypers H, Varkas G, Beeckman S, et al. Elevated calprotectin levels reveal bowel inflammation in spondyloarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2016. 75:1357-1362[4] Arzu Duran, Senol Kobak, Nazime Sen, et al. Fecal calprotectin is associated with disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2016. 16 (1):71-4Disclosure of Interests:Galina Lukina Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Abbvie, Biocad, MSD, Roche, Polina Kulakova: None declared, Nadezhda Savenkova: None declared, Evgeniy Volnukhin: None declared, Anton Kovshik: None declared, Elena Alexandrova: None declared, Alexandr Novikov: None declared


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1090-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie R. Harrold ◽  
George W. Reed ◽  
Ashwini Shewade ◽  
Robert Magner ◽  
Katherine C. Saunders ◽  
...  

Objective.To characterize the real-world effectiveness of rituximab (RTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Methods.Clinical effectiveness at 12 months was assessed in patients who were prescribed RTX based on the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Change in CDAI was calculated (CDAI at 12 mos minus at initiation). Achievement of remission or low disease activity (LDA; CDAI ≤ 10) among those with moderate/high disease activity at the time of RTX initiation was compared based on prior anti-tumor necrosis factor agent (anti-TNF) use (1 vs ≥ 2) using logistic regression models.Results.Patients (n = 265) were followed for 12 months with a mean change in CDAI of −8.1 (95% CI −9.8 – −6.4). Of the 218 patients with moderate/high disease activity at baseline, patients with 1 prior anti-TNF (baseline CDAI 25.0) demonstrated a mean change in CDAI of −10.1 (95% CI −13.2 – −7.0); patients with ≥ 2 prior anti-TNF (baseline CDAI 30.0) demonstrated a mean change of −10.5 (95% CI −12.9 – −8.0). The unadjusted OR for achieving LDA/remission in patients with moderate/high disease activity at baseline exposed to ≥ 2 versus 1 prior anti-TNF was 0.40 (95% CI 0.22–0.73), which was robust to 4 different adjusted models (OR range 0.38–0.44).Conclusion.A good clinical response was observed in all patients; however, patients previously treated with 1 anti-TNF, who had lower baseline CDAI and a greater opportunity for clinical improvement compared with patients previously treated with ≥ 2 anti-TNF, were more likely to achieve LDA/remission.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
HananSayed M. Abozaid ◽  
RababHussin Ali ◽  
OsamaSayed Daifallah ◽  
EsamMohmad Abu Alfadl ◽  
SaharAbdel-Rahman Elsayed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document